A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC Structures

In post-earthquake damage assessment studies of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, the most important consideration is to determine the damage and severity of structural elements is the determination of the damage and severity of structural elements. For earthquake damage to structural elements, su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beyza Gultekin, Gamze Dogan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/6027701
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832543461087117312
author Beyza Gultekin
Gamze Dogan
author_facet Beyza Gultekin
Gamze Dogan
author_sort Beyza Gultekin
collection DOAJ
description In post-earthquake damage assessment studies of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, the most important consideration is to determine the damage and severity of structural elements is the determination of the damage and severity of structural elements. For earthquake damage to structural elements, such as columns and shear walls, decisions can be made about strengthening or demolition. However, due to the need for rapid assessment of damaged buildings after earthquakes, these two damage mechanisms can sometimes be confused. Non-structural damage is classified as structural, leading to uneconomic structural decisions such as demolition or strengthening, or conversely, life safety issues arise from misidentifying critical structural damage with non-structural damage. In this study, an artificial intelligence-based damage assessment algorithm has been developed to accurately and quickly differentiate between structural and non-structural damage. For the damage classification model, a deep learning algorithm was developed using the 9680 damage images obtained from field studies after the recent earthquakes of Mw ≥ 5; Istanbul-Silivri (Mw: 5.8), Elazığ-Sivrice (Mw: 6.8) and Izmir-Seferihisar (Mw: 6.6) in Turkey. With an accuracy rate between 93% and 96%, the models constructed by selecting the optimal values correctly detected and categorised structural and non-structural element damages in RC structures. The method developed in this study can help experts in damage assessment studies as a decision support mechanism.
format Article
id doaj-art-e331fb9e6e054f37afc741d27323a74d
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-e331fb9e6e054f37afc741d27323a74d2025-02-03T11:43:23ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942024-01-01202410.1155/2024/6027701A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC StructuresBeyza Gultekin0Gamze Dogan1Department of Civil EngineeringDepartment of Civil EngineeringIn post-earthquake damage assessment studies of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, the most important consideration is to determine the damage and severity of structural elements is the determination of the damage and severity of structural elements. For earthquake damage to structural elements, such as columns and shear walls, decisions can be made about strengthening or demolition. However, due to the need for rapid assessment of damaged buildings after earthquakes, these two damage mechanisms can sometimes be confused. Non-structural damage is classified as structural, leading to uneconomic structural decisions such as demolition or strengthening, or conversely, life safety issues arise from misidentifying critical structural damage with non-structural damage. In this study, an artificial intelligence-based damage assessment algorithm has been developed to accurately and quickly differentiate between structural and non-structural damage. For the damage classification model, a deep learning algorithm was developed using the 9680 damage images obtained from field studies after the recent earthquakes of Mw ≥ 5; Istanbul-Silivri (Mw: 5.8), Elazığ-Sivrice (Mw: 6.8) and Izmir-Seferihisar (Mw: 6.6) in Turkey. With an accuracy rate between 93% and 96%, the models constructed by selecting the optimal values correctly detected and categorised structural and non-structural element damages in RC structures. The method developed in this study can help experts in damage assessment studies as a decision support mechanism.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/6027701
spellingShingle Beyza Gultekin
Gamze Dogan
A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC Structures
Advances in Civil Engineering
title A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC Structures
title_full A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC Structures
title_fullStr A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC Structures
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC Structures
title_short A Novel Approach to Discriminate Between Structural and Non-Structural Post-Earthquake Damage in RC Structures
title_sort novel approach to discriminate between structural and non structural post earthquake damage in rc structures
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/6027701
work_keys_str_mv AT beyzagultekin anovelapproachtodiscriminatebetweenstructuralandnonstructuralpostearthquakedamageinrcstructures
AT gamzedogan anovelapproachtodiscriminatebetweenstructuralandnonstructuralpostearthquakedamageinrcstructures
AT beyzagultekin novelapproachtodiscriminatebetweenstructuralandnonstructuralpostearthquakedamageinrcstructures
AT gamzedogan novelapproachtodiscriminatebetweenstructuralandnonstructuralpostearthquakedamageinrcstructures