A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit

Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rowena Almeida, William G. Paterson, Nancy Craig, Lawrence Hookey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563809811693568
author Rowena Almeida
William G. Paterson
Nancy Craig
Lawrence Hookey
author_facet Rowena Almeida
William G. Paterson
Nancy Craig
Lawrence Hookey
author_sort Rowena Almeida
collection DOAJ
description Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient flow through the Hotel-Dieu Hospital (Kingston, Ontario) endoscopy unit was followed by qualitative interviews. Procedures were directly observed in three segments: individual endoscopy room use, preprocedure/recovery room, and overall endoscopy unit utilization. Results. Data were collected for 137 procedures in the endoscopy room, 139 procedures in the preprocedure room, and 143 procedures for overall room utilization. The mean duration spent in the endoscopy room was 31.47 min for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 52.93 min for a colonoscopy, 30.47 min for a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 66.88 min for a double procedure. The procedure itself accounted for 8.11 min, 34.24 min, 9.02 min, and 39.13 min for the above procedures, respectively. The focused interviews identified the scheduling template as a major area of operational inefficiency. Conclusions. Despite reasonable procedure times for all except colonoscopies, the endoscopy room durations exceed the allocated times, reflecting the impact of non-procedure-related factors and the need for a revised scheduling template. Endoscopy units have unique operational characteristics and identification of process inefficiencies can lead to targeted quality improvement initiatives.
format Article
id doaj-art-e31c18bea5ab455fa7dae29729d25d8f
institution Kabale University
issn 2291-2789
2291-2797
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
spelling doaj-art-e31c18bea5ab455fa7dae29729d25d8f2025-02-03T01:12:29ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2291-27892291-27972016-01-01201610.1155/2016/25740762574076A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy UnitRowena Almeida0William G. Paterson1Nancy Craig2Lawrence Hookey3Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, CanadaGastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, CanadaGastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, CanadaGastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, CanadaBackground. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient flow through the Hotel-Dieu Hospital (Kingston, Ontario) endoscopy unit was followed by qualitative interviews. Procedures were directly observed in three segments: individual endoscopy room use, preprocedure/recovery room, and overall endoscopy unit utilization. Results. Data were collected for 137 procedures in the endoscopy room, 139 procedures in the preprocedure room, and 143 procedures for overall room utilization. The mean duration spent in the endoscopy room was 31.47 min for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 52.93 min for a colonoscopy, 30.47 min for a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 66.88 min for a double procedure. The procedure itself accounted for 8.11 min, 34.24 min, 9.02 min, and 39.13 min for the above procedures, respectively. The focused interviews identified the scheduling template as a major area of operational inefficiency. Conclusions. Despite reasonable procedure times for all except colonoscopies, the endoscopy room durations exceed the allocated times, reflecting the impact of non-procedure-related factors and the need for a revised scheduling template. Endoscopy units have unique operational characteristics and identification of process inefficiencies can lead to targeted quality improvement initiatives.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076
spellingShingle Rowena Almeida
William G. Paterson
Nancy Craig
Lawrence Hookey
A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
title A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_full A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_fullStr A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_full_unstemmed A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_short A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_sort patient flow analysis identification of process inefficiencies and workflow metrics at an ambulatory endoscopy unit
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076
work_keys_str_mv AT rowenaalmeida apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT williamgpaterson apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT nancycraig apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT lawrencehookey apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT rowenaalmeida patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT williamgpaterson patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT nancycraig patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT lawrencehookey patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit