Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its Accomplishments
Belarus is a country with a blurred identity that has not cut the umbilical cord connecting it with Mother Russia. According to a representative national survey of April 2020, only 25 percent of Belarusians would prefer to retain statehood and national sovereignty of Belarus even if their living sta...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
MGIMO University Press
2021-05-01
|
| Series: | Международная аналитика |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/313 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849695461530664960 |
|---|---|
| author | G. Ioffe |
| author_facet | G. Ioffe |
| author_sort | G. Ioffe |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Belarus is a country with a blurred identity that has not cut the umbilical cord connecting it with Mother Russia. According to a representative national survey of April 2020, only 25 percent of Belarusians would prefer to retain statehood and national sovereignty of Belarus even if their living standards worsen whereas 52 percent would opt for limited sovereignty if it is the price to pay for retaining or improving the quality of life. This may be the best-kept secret of Belarus and it has implications more serious than just economic dependency on Belarus’s eastern neighbor. Belarus used to be a contested borderland claimed by both Russians and Poles. Today, it is a country with two historical narratives and nation-building blueprints that have been confronting each other since the inception of the Belarusian national movement. While the neo-Soviet/Russo-centric narrative has held sway over the majority of Belarusians, the Westernizing narrative was hard-hit on several occasions but has been making headway since Gorbachev’s Perestroika. Pluses and minuses of two narratives and the attempts at bridging the gap between them are analyzed. There are essentially two kinds of divisions in Belarusian society: between the respective projects of nation-building and between Lukashenka loyalists and his detractors. These two divisions do not quite coincide, but there is a growing tendency to couch the ongoing political crisis in nationalist terms. The point is made that a lack of cohesive Belarusian identity is an existential threat to Belarusian statehood. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e312b43b8ac34abdba13745708cd3c2f |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2587-8476 2541-9633 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
| publisher | MGIMO University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Международная аналитика |
| spelling | doaj-art-e312b43b8ac34abdba13745708cd3c2f2025-08-20T03:19:46ZrusMGIMO University PressМеждународная аналитика2587-84762541-96332021-05-0112114616110.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-1-146-161295Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its AccomplishmentsG. Ioffe0Radford UniversityBelarus is a country with a blurred identity that has not cut the umbilical cord connecting it with Mother Russia. According to a representative national survey of April 2020, only 25 percent of Belarusians would prefer to retain statehood and national sovereignty of Belarus even if their living standards worsen whereas 52 percent would opt for limited sovereignty if it is the price to pay for retaining or improving the quality of life. This may be the best-kept secret of Belarus and it has implications more serious than just economic dependency on Belarus’s eastern neighbor. Belarus used to be a contested borderland claimed by both Russians and Poles. Today, it is a country with two historical narratives and nation-building blueprints that have been confronting each other since the inception of the Belarusian national movement. While the neo-Soviet/Russo-centric narrative has held sway over the majority of Belarusians, the Westernizing narrative was hard-hit on several occasions but has been making headway since Gorbachev’s Perestroika. Pluses and minuses of two narratives and the attempts at bridging the gap between them are analyzed. There are essentially two kinds of divisions in Belarusian society: between the respective projects of nation-building and between Lukashenka loyalists and his detractors. These two divisions do not quite coincide, but there is a growing tendency to couch the ongoing political crisis in nationalist terms. The point is made that a lack of cohesive Belarusian identity is an existential threat to Belarusian statehood.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/313belarusian nationalismlukashenkanational identityhistorical memory |
| spellingShingle | G. Ioffe Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its Accomplishments Международная аналитика belarusian nationalism lukashenka national identity historical memory |
| title | Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its Accomplishments |
| title_full | Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its Accomplishments |
| title_fullStr | Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its Accomplishments |
| title_full_unstemmed | Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its Accomplishments |
| title_short | Belarusian Nationalism: Taking Stock of Its Accomplishments |
| title_sort | belarusian nationalism taking stock of its accomplishments |
| topic | belarusian nationalism lukashenka national identity historical memory |
| url | https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/313 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gioffe belarusiannationalismtakingstockofitsaccomplishments |