Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.

We attempted to replicate a potential tinnitus biomarker in humans based on the Sensory Precision Integrative Model of Tinnitus called the Intensity Mismatch Asymmetry. A few advances on the design were also included, including tighter matching of participants for gender, and a control stimulus freq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ekaterina A Yukhnovich, Kai Alter, William Sedley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289062&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849337161303719936
author Ekaterina A Yukhnovich
Kai Alter
William Sedley
author_facet Ekaterina A Yukhnovich
Kai Alter
William Sedley
author_sort Ekaterina A Yukhnovich
collection DOAJ
description We attempted to replicate a potential tinnitus biomarker in humans based on the Sensory Precision Integrative Model of Tinnitus called the Intensity Mismatch Asymmetry. A few advances on the design were also included, including tighter matching of participants for gender, and a control stimulus frequency of 1 kHz to investigate whether any differences between control and tinnitus groups are specific to the tinnitus frequency or domain-general. The expectation was that there would be asymmetry in the MMN responses between tinnitus and control groups at the tinnitus frequency, but not at the control frequency, where the tinnitus group would have larger, more negative responses to upward deviants than downward deviants, and the control group would have the opposite pattern or lack of a deviant direction effect. However, no significant group differences were found. There was a striking difference in response amplitude to control frequency stimuli compared to tinnitus frequency stimuli, which could be an intrinsic quality of responses to these frequencies or could reflect high frequency hearing loss in the sample. Additionally, the upward deviants elicited stronger MMN responses in both groups at tinnitus frequency, but not at the control frequency. Factors contributing to these discrepant results at the tinnitus frequency could include hyperacusis, attention, and wider contextual effects of other frequencies used in the experiment (i.e. the control frequency in other blocks).
format Article
id doaj-art-e303c18f31b640468a44d80e142d83bb
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-e303c18f31b640468a44d80e142d83bb2025-08-20T03:44:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01188e028906210.1371/journal.pone.0289062Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.Ekaterina A YukhnovichKai AlterWilliam SedleyWe attempted to replicate a potential tinnitus biomarker in humans based on the Sensory Precision Integrative Model of Tinnitus called the Intensity Mismatch Asymmetry. A few advances on the design were also included, including tighter matching of participants for gender, and a control stimulus frequency of 1 kHz to investigate whether any differences between control and tinnitus groups are specific to the tinnitus frequency or domain-general. The expectation was that there would be asymmetry in the MMN responses between tinnitus and control groups at the tinnitus frequency, but not at the control frequency, where the tinnitus group would have larger, more negative responses to upward deviants than downward deviants, and the control group would have the opposite pattern or lack of a deviant direction effect. However, no significant group differences were found. There was a striking difference in response amplitude to control frequency stimuli compared to tinnitus frequency stimuli, which could be an intrinsic quality of responses to these frequencies or could reflect high frequency hearing loss in the sample. Additionally, the upward deviants elicited stronger MMN responses in both groups at tinnitus frequency, but not at the control frequency. Factors contributing to these discrepant results at the tinnitus frequency could include hyperacusis, attention, and wider contextual effects of other frequencies used in the experiment (i.e. the control frequency in other blocks).https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289062&type=printable
spellingShingle Ekaterina A Yukhnovich
Kai Alter
William Sedley
Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.
PLoS ONE
title Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.
title_full Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.
title_fullStr Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.
title_full_unstemmed Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.
title_short Nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus.
title_sort nuances in intensity deviant asymmetric responses as a biomarker for tinnitus
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289062&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT ekaterinaayukhnovich nuancesinintensitydeviantasymmetricresponsesasabiomarkerfortinnitus
AT kaialter nuancesinintensitydeviantasymmetricresponsesasabiomarkerfortinnitus
AT williamsedley nuancesinintensitydeviantasymmetricresponsesasabiomarkerfortinnitus