Real-world disease burden and planned treatment optimization after MANAGE-PD implementation in Germany: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background In Germany, the approach to treatment optimization for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is considered somewhat conservative. The MANAGE-PD tool ( www.managepd.eu ) was developed to help identify patients with advanced PD and to facilitate treatment decision ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Südmeyer, David J. Pedrosa, Frank Siebecker, Carolin Arlt, Jaakko Kopra, Wolfgang H. Jost
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:Neurological Research and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-025-00383-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background In Germany, the approach to treatment optimization for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is considered somewhat conservative. The MANAGE-PD tool ( www.managepd.eu ) was developed to help identify patients with advanced PD and to facilitate treatment decision making and appropriate allocation of patients to device-aided therapies (DAT). This prospective, non-interventional study aimed to investigate the real-world disease burden of PD and treatment optimization after MANAGE-PD implementation. Methods Adult PD patients (N = 278) visited specialist clinics and neurologist’s practices in Germany in 2022. Disease burden was assessed using the Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS parts II-IV), the non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS) and the 8-item Parkinson’s disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). Data on planned treatment changes were collected. Data were analyzed by disease control categories according to the MANAGE-PD tool. Results Mean scores for motor and non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and comorbidity burden were worse in patients with lower disease control measured by MANAGE-PD. For 52.8% of patients in Category 2 (inadequately controlled—might benefit from oral optimization), no change in oral treatment was planned. No change in oral treatment and no DAT initiation was planned for 37.9% and 65.0% of patients in Category 3 (inadequately controlled—might benefit from DAT). Patient refusal and needing more time to decide were the most common reasons for not making treatment changes. Conclusions This study supports the validity of MANAGE-PD by showing its high association with disease burden and emphasizes the importance of timely provision of necessary information to enable informed decisions about treatment optimization.
ISSN:2524-3489