Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of Happiness

In her Discourse on Happiness, Émilie Du Châtelet claims that one must be susceptible to illusions to be happy. She gives almost no explanation of what illusions are or what causes them, and thus does not appear to satisfactorily defend her claim. I offer an account of Du Châtelet’s theory of illusi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aperio 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Modern Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmphil.org/article/pubid/236/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575971674292224
collection DOAJ
description In her Discourse on Happiness, Émilie Du Châtelet claims that one must be susceptible to illusions to be happy. She gives almost no explanation of what illusions are or what causes them, and thus does not appear to satisfactorily defend her claim. I offer an account of Du Châtelet’s theory of illusion by drawing upon the previously unexamined influence of other French philosophers’ accounts of the connection between passion and illusions, including Descartes, Malebranche, and Anne-Thérèse, Marquise de Lambert. According to this tradition, the passions misrepresentations of their objects in the imagination, which are called “illusions”. This theory of passionate misrepresentation to Du Châtelet promises to solve a number of puzzles about illusion that arise in the Discourse. First, it explains why she claims illusions are necessary for happiness. Second, it offers an explanation of how illusions are different from cognitive errors made in other domains, like philosophy and natural science.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2dfadfcaebe4bfb9d2fb5ea321237c7
institution Kabale University
issn 2644-0652
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Aperio
record_format Article
series Journal of Modern Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-e2dfadfcaebe4bfb9d2fb5ea321237c72025-01-31T16:08:48ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522025-01-017010.25894/jmp.1942Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of HappinessIn her Discourse on Happiness, Émilie Du Châtelet claims that one must be susceptible to illusions to be happy. She gives almost no explanation of what illusions are or what causes them, and thus does not appear to satisfactorily defend her claim. I offer an account of Du Châtelet’s theory of illusion by drawing upon the previously unexamined influence of other French philosophers’ accounts of the connection between passion and illusions, including Descartes, Malebranche, and Anne-Thérèse, Marquise de Lambert. According to this tradition, the passions misrepresentations of their objects in the imagination, which are called “illusions”. This theory of passionate misrepresentation to Du Châtelet promises to solve a number of puzzles about illusion that arise in the Discourse. First, it explains why she claims illusions are necessary for happiness. Second, it offers an explanation of how illusions are different from cognitive errors made in other domains, like philosophy and natural science.https://jmphil.org/article/pubid/236/IllusionEmilie Du ChâteletImaginationPassionsHappiness
spellingShingle Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of Happiness
Journal of Modern Philosophy
Illusion
Emilie Du Châtelet
Imagination
Passions
Happiness
title Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of Happiness
title_full Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of Happiness
title_fullStr Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of Happiness
title_full_unstemmed Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of Happiness
title_short Illusion in Du Châtelet's Theory of Happiness
title_sort illusion in du chatelet s theory of happiness
topic Illusion
Emilie Du Châtelet
Imagination
Passions
Happiness
url https://jmphil.org/article/pubid/236/