Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming

Transgressions triggered by social media influencers’ inappropriate statements lead to social media hypes. The online public arena in Romania was dominated by a ‘stretch mark’ scandal when a famous influencer (George Buhnici) body shamed women. His controversial remarks urged a wave of outrage in th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Camelia Cmeciu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos 2025-04-01
Series:methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.methaodos.org/revista-methaodos/index.php/methaodos/article/view/860
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850198526848401408
author Camelia Cmeciu
author_facet Camelia Cmeciu
author_sort Camelia Cmeciu
collection DOAJ
description Transgressions triggered by social media influencers’ inappropriate statements lead to social media hypes. The online public arena in Romania was dominated by a ‘stretch mark’ scandal when a famous influencer (George Buhnici) body shamed women. His controversial remarks urged a wave of outrage in the digitalized environment. Applying a sociocultural approach to character assassination and a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis, we aimed at identifying how the social media influencer (SMI) was represented in the online users’ comments and how the commenters discursively represented themselves. The main findings showed that name calling, ridicule, social identity denial, and disgracing were the four main character attack strategies present in the cancelation supporters’ representation of the influencer as the ‘other’. In their attempt to protect the body shamer (the influencer) from losing his social capital, cancelation resisters employed minimizing, bolstering, transcendence (freedom of speech), and attacking the accuser (the canceler) as main strategies to represent the influencer as ‘one of us’. Online users adopted three main roles in their discursive self-representation: delegitimators of collective Us, experiencers, and social advisers. In the end, the study provides a threefold relationship framework for the cancelation process triggered by social media influencers’ transgressions.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2d3b65fec584fe8aec369938d4d61df
institution OA Journals
issn 2340-8413
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
record_format Article
series methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales
spelling doaj-art-e2d3b65fec584fe8aec369938d4d61df2025-08-20T02:12:51ZengUniversidad Rey Juan Carlosmethaodos.revista de ciencias sociales2340-84132025-04-01131m251301a02m251301a0210.17502/mrcs.v13i1.860779Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shamingCamelia Cmeciuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-8274Transgressions triggered by social media influencers’ inappropriate statements lead to social media hypes. The online public arena in Romania was dominated by a ‘stretch mark’ scandal when a famous influencer (George Buhnici) body shamed women. His controversial remarks urged a wave of outrage in the digitalized environment. Applying a sociocultural approach to character assassination and a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis, we aimed at identifying how the social media influencer (SMI) was represented in the online users’ comments and how the commenters discursively represented themselves. The main findings showed that name calling, ridicule, social identity denial, and disgracing were the four main character attack strategies present in the cancelation supporters’ representation of the influencer as the ‘other’. In their attempt to protect the body shamer (the influencer) from losing his social capital, cancelation resisters employed minimizing, bolstering, transcendence (freedom of speech), and attacking the accuser (the canceler) as main strategies to represent the influencer as ‘one of us’. Online users adopted three main roles in their discursive self-representation: delegitimators of collective Us, experiencers, and social advisers. In the end, the study provides a threefold relationship framework for the cancelation process triggered by social media influencers’ transgressions.https://www.methaodos.org/revista-methaodos/index.php/methaodos/article/view/860cancel cultureinfluencersgestores de crisisdiscourse analysischaracter assassination
spellingShingle Camelia Cmeciu
Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming
methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales
cancel culture
influencers
gestores de crisis
discourse analysis
character assassination
title Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming
title_full Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming
title_fullStr Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming
title_full_unstemmed Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming
title_short Social media influencers’ transgressions – A multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming
title_sort social media influencers transgressions a multimodal critical discourse analysis of canceling strategies in threaded discussion on body shaming
topic cancel culture
influencers
gestores de crisis
discourse analysis
character assassination
url https://www.methaodos.org/revista-methaodos/index.php/methaodos/article/view/860
work_keys_str_mv AT cameliacmeciu socialmediainfluencerstransgressionsamultimodalcriticaldiscourseanalysisofcancelingstrategiesinthreadeddiscussiononbodyshaming