Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohort

Background: The revised Japanese criteria, the International study group (ISG), the International criteria for Behcet's disease (ICBD) 2006, and the revised ICBD 2010 are frequently used for the classification of Behcet's Disease (BD). In this study we evaluated the performance of these cr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Ahmed Hussein, Mona I Ellawindi, Gaafar Ragab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Rheumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/article.asp?issn=0973-3698;year=2017;volume=12;issue=3;spage=152;epage=155;aulast=Hussein
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542984198946816
author Mohamed Ahmed Hussein
Mona I Ellawindi
Gaafar Ragab
author_facet Mohamed Ahmed Hussein
Mona I Ellawindi
Gaafar Ragab
author_sort Mohamed Ahmed Hussein
collection DOAJ
description Background: The revised Japanese criteria, the International study group (ISG), the International criteria for Behcet's disease (ICBD) 2006, and the revised ICBD 2010 are frequently used for the classification of Behcet's Disease (BD). In this study we evaluated the performance of these criteria sets in Egyptians. Methods: A total of of 461 Egyptian patients over 5 years were studied. It included 256 patients classified as BD based on expert opinion and 205 patients with other autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory diseases with symptoms similar to BD. Performance of the revised Japanese criteria, ISG, ICBD 2006, and the revised ICBD 2010 was evaluated evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), diagnostic odd ratio (DOR), and Youden's index (YI). Results: ICBD 2010 carried the highest sensitivity (98.83%), NPV (98.48%), DOR (1645), and YI (0.94) with lowest NLR (0.01). On the other hand, ICBD 2006 and ISG were very specific (99.51%, 99.41%, respectively) with PPV (99.49%, 99.40%) and PLR (155.35, 126.33), respectively. Conclusions: ICBD 2010 is a very good criteria set to be used in Egyptian BD patients based on its very high sensitivity, accepted specificity, and power of discrimination that enables early patients classification, management, and prognosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2607ed95f5645998f43619fd328fbb4
institution Kabale University
issn 0973-3698
0973-3701
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Rheumatology
spelling doaj-art-e2607ed95f5645998f43619fd328fbb42025-02-03T12:03:50ZengSAGE PublishingIndian Journal of Rheumatology0973-36980973-37012017-01-0112315215510.4103/injr.injr_29_17Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohortMohamed Ahmed HusseinMona I EllawindiGaafar RagabBackground: The revised Japanese criteria, the International study group (ISG), the International criteria for Behcet's disease (ICBD) 2006, and the revised ICBD 2010 are frequently used for the classification of Behcet's Disease (BD). In this study we evaluated the performance of these criteria sets in Egyptians. Methods: A total of of 461 Egyptian patients over 5 years were studied. It included 256 patients classified as BD based on expert opinion and 205 patients with other autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory diseases with symptoms similar to BD. Performance of the revised Japanese criteria, ISG, ICBD 2006, and the revised ICBD 2010 was evaluated evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), diagnostic odd ratio (DOR), and Youden's index (YI). Results: ICBD 2010 carried the highest sensitivity (98.83%), NPV (98.48%), DOR (1645), and YI (0.94) with lowest NLR (0.01). On the other hand, ICBD 2006 and ISG were very specific (99.51%, 99.41%, respectively) with PPV (99.49%, 99.40%) and PLR (155.35, 126.33), respectively. Conclusions: ICBD 2010 is a very good criteria set to be used in Egyptian BD patients based on its very high sensitivity, accepted specificity, and power of discrimination that enables early patients classification, management, and prognosis.http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/article.asp?issn=0973-3698;year=2017;volume=12;issue=3;spage=152;epage=155;aulast=HusseinBehcet's diseaseclassification criteriaclinical diagnosiscriteria performance
spellingShingle Mohamed Ahmed Hussein
Mona I Ellawindi
Gaafar Ragab
Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohort
Indian Journal of Rheumatology
Behcet's disease
classification criteria
clinical diagnosis
criteria performance
title Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohort
title_full Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohort
title_fullStr Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohort
title_full_unstemmed Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohort
title_short Performance of classification criteria for Behcet's disease in an Egyptian cohort
title_sort performance of classification criteria for behcet s disease in an egyptian cohort
topic Behcet's disease
classification criteria
clinical diagnosis
criteria performance
url http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/article.asp?issn=0973-3698;year=2017;volume=12;issue=3;spage=152;epage=155;aulast=Hussein
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedahmedhussein performanceofclassificationcriteriaforbehcetsdiseaseinanegyptiancohort
AT monaiellawindi performanceofclassificationcriteriaforbehcetsdiseaseinanegyptiancohort
AT gaafarragab performanceofclassificationcriteriaforbehcetsdiseaseinanegyptiancohort