Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the properties and feasibility of existing risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome outcomes in adult survivors of critical illness. Methods: As of November 1, 2023, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pengfei Yang, Fu Yang, Qi Wang, Fang Fang, Qian Yu, Rui Tai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal of Nursing Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201322400111X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586304374702080
author Pengfei Yang
Fu Yang
Qi Wang
Fang Fang
Qian Yu
Rui Tai
author_facet Pengfei Yang
Fu Yang
Qi Wang
Fang Fang
Qian Yu
Rui Tai
author_sort Pengfei Yang
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the properties and feasibility of existing risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome outcomes in adult survivors of critical illness. Methods: As of November 1, 2023, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, Wanfang database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were searched. Following the literature screening process, we extracted data encompassing participant sources, post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) outcomes, sample sizes, missing data, predictive factors, model development methodologies, and metrics for model performance and evaluation. We conducted a review and classification of the PICS domains and predictive factors identified in each study. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was employed to assess the quality and applicability of the studies. Results: This systematic review included a total of 16 studies, comprising two cognitive impairment studies, four psychological impairment studies, eight physiological impairment studies, and two studies on all three domains. The discriminative ability of prediction models measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68–0.90. The predictive performance of most models was excellent, but most models were biased and overfitted. All predictive factors tend to encompass age, pre-ICU functional impairment, in-ICU experiences, and early-onset new symptoms. Conclusions: This review identified 16 prediction models and the predictive factors for PICS. Nonetheless, due to the numerous methodological and reporting shortcomings identified in the studies under review, clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting the predictions made by these models. To avert the development of PICS, it is imperative for clinicians to closely monitor prognostic factors, including the in-ICU experience and early-onset new symptoms.
format Article
id doaj-art-e25dfe33c5de4245a327be019951256b
institution Kabale University
issn 2352-0132
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Nursing Sciences
spelling doaj-art-e25dfe33c5de4245a327be019951256b2025-01-26T05:03:59ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Nursing Sciences2352-01322025-01-011218188Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic reviewPengfei Yang0Fu Yang1Qi Wang2Fang Fang3Qian Yu4Rui Tai5School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China; Corresponding author. School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.Department of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaObjectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the properties and feasibility of existing risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome outcomes in adult survivors of critical illness. Methods: As of November 1, 2023, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, Wanfang database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were searched. Following the literature screening process, we extracted data encompassing participant sources, post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) outcomes, sample sizes, missing data, predictive factors, model development methodologies, and metrics for model performance and evaluation. We conducted a review and classification of the PICS domains and predictive factors identified in each study. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was employed to assess the quality and applicability of the studies. Results: This systematic review included a total of 16 studies, comprising two cognitive impairment studies, four psychological impairment studies, eight physiological impairment studies, and two studies on all three domains. The discriminative ability of prediction models measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68–0.90. The predictive performance of most models was excellent, but most models were biased and overfitted. All predictive factors tend to encompass age, pre-ICU functional impairment, in-ICU experiences, and early-onset new symptoms. Conclusions: This review identified 16 prediction models and the predictive factors for PICS. Nonetheless, due to the numerous methodological and reporting shortcomings identified in the studies under review, clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting the predictions made by these models. To avert the development of PICS, it is imperative for clinicians to closely monitor prognostic factors, including the in-ICU experience and early-onset new symptoms.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201322400111XCritical carePost-intensive care syndromePrediction modelSystematic review
spellingShingle Pengfei Yang
Fu Yang
Qi Wang
Fang Fang
Qian Yu
Rui Tai
Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review
International Journal of Nursing Sciences
Critical care
Post-intensive care syndrome
Prediction model
Systematic review
title Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review
title_full Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review
title_fullStr Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review
title_short Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review
title_sort risk prediction models for post intensive care syndrome of icu discharged patients a systematic review
topic Critical care
Post-intensive care syndrome
Prediction model
Systematic review
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201322400111X
work_keys_str_mv AT pengfeiyang riskpredictionmodelsforpostintensivecaresyndromeoficudischargedpatientsasystematicreview
AT fuyang riskpredictionmodelsforpostintensivecaresyndromeoficudischargedpatientsasystematicreview
AT qiwang riskpredictionmodelsforpostintensivecaresyndromeoficudischargedpatientsasystematicreview
AT fangfang riskpredictionmodelsforpostintensivecaresyndromeoficudischargedpatientsasystematicreview
AT qianyu riskpredictionmodelsforpostintensivecaresyndromeoficudischargedpatientsasystematicreview
AT ruitai riskpredictionmodelsforpostintensivecaresyndromeoficudischargedpatientsasystematicreview