Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures
Objectives. This study evaluated consistency between self-reported values for clinical measures and recorded clinical measures. Methods. Self-reported values were collected for the clinical measures: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, glucose level, height, weight, and cholesterol fr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Cardiology Research and Practice |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4364761 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832554465755922432 |
|---|---|
| author | Joseph Thomas III Mindy Paulet Jigar R. Rajpura |
| author_facet | Joseph Thomas III Mindy Paulet Jigar R. Rajpura |
| author_sort | Joseph Thomas III |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives. This study evaluated consistency between self-reported values for clinical measures and recorded clinical measures. Methods. Self-reported values were collected for the clinical measures: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, glucose level, height, weight, and cholesterol from health risk assessments completed by enrollees in a privately insured cohort. Body mass index (BMI) was computed from reported height and weight. Practitioner recorded values for the clinical measures were obtained from health screenings. We used bivariate Pearson correlation analysis and descriptive statistics to evaluate consistency between self-reported data and recorded clinic measurements. Results. There was high correlation between self-reported clinical values and recorded clinical measures for diastolic blood pressure (r=0.91, P=<0.0001), systolic blood pressure (r=0.93, P=<0.0001), cholesterol (r=0.97, P=<0.0001), body mass index (r=0.96, P=<0.0001), glucose (r=0.96, P=<0.0001), weight (r=0.98, P=<0.0001), and height (r=0.89, P=<0.0001). Conclusions. Self-reported clinical values for each of the eight clinical measures examined had good consistency with practitioner recorded data. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e231fc343f0f442bbd5ac40bc6d1ee31 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-8016 2090-0597 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cardiology Research and Practice |
| spelling | doaj-art-e231fc343f0f442bbd5ac40bc6d1ee312025-02-03T05:51:27ZengWileyCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972016-01-01201610.1155/2016/43647614364761Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical MeasuresJoseph Thomas III0Mindy Paulet1Jigar R. Rajpura2Purdue University, College of Pharmacy and Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Center for Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Robert Heine Pharmacy Building, Room 502A, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2091, USAWorkLife Programs Human Resources Purdue University, 1601 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2091, USAPurdue University, College of Pharmacy and Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Center for Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Robert Heine Pharmacy Building, Room 515, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2091, USAObjectives. This study evaluated consistency between self-reported values for clinical measures and recorded clinical measures. Methods. Self-reported values were collected for the clinical measures: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, glucose level, height, weight, and cholesterol from health risk assessments completed by enrollees in a privately insured cohort. Body mass index (BMI) was computed from reported height and weight. Practitioner recorded values for the clinical measures were obtained from health screenings. We used bivariate Pearson correlation analysis and descriptive statistics to evaluate consistency between self-reported data and recorded clinic measurements. Results. There was high correlation between self-reported clinical values and recorded clinical measures for diastolic blood pressure (r=0.91, P=<0.0001), systolic blood pressure (r=0.93, P=<0.0001), cholesterol (r=0.97, P=<0.0001), body mass index (r=0.96, P=<0.0001), glucose (r=0.96, P=<0.0001), weight (r=0.98, P=<0.0001), and height (r=0.89, P=<0.0001). Conclusions. Self-reported clinical values for each of the eight clinical measures examined had good consistency with practitioner recorded data.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4364761 |
| spellingShingle | Joseph Thomas III Mindy Paulet Jigar R. Rajpura Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures Cardiology Research and Practice |
| title | Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures |
| title_full | Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures |
| title_fullStr | Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures |
| title_short | Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures |
| title_sort | consistency between self reported and recorded values for clinical measures |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4364761 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT josephthomasiii consistencybetweenselfreportedandrecordedvaluesforclinicalmeasures AT mindypaulet consistencybetweenselfreportedandrecordedvaluesforclinicalmeasures AT jigarrrajpura consistencybetweenselfreportedandrecordedvaluesforclinicalmeasures |