A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous
Lady Mary Shepherd holds that the relation of cause and effect consists of the combination of two objects (the causes) to create a third object (the effect). She also holds that this account implies that causes are synchronous with their effects. There is a single instant in which the objects that a...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Aperio
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Modern Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jmphil.org/article/id/2131/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832575971220258816 |
---|---|
author | David Landy |
author_facet | David Landy |
author_sort | David Landy |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Lady Mary Shepherd holds that the relation of cause and effect consists of the combination of two objects (the causes) to create a third object (the effect). She also holds that this account implies that causes are synchronous with their effects. There is a single instant in which the objects that are causes combine to create the object which is their effect. Hume argues that cause and effect cannot be synchronous because if they were then the entire chain of successive causes and effects would all collapse into a single moment, and succession would not be possible. I argue that Shepherd has a ready, although implicit response, to Hume’s argument. Since causation is combination on Shepherd’s view, she is free to hold that there are times in between those instants in which combinations occur, during which times other, non-combinatory changes (such as changes in the location of objects) occur, which changes account for succession. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-e2136baafba74c66a7a3769716e280af |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2644-0652 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Aperio |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Modern Philosophy |
spelling | doaj-art-e2136baafba74c66a7a3769716e280af2025-01-31T16:08:11ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522020-01-012010.25894/jmp.2131A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as SynchronousDavid Landy0 Lady Mary Shepherd holds that the relation of cause and effect consists of the combination of two objects (the causes) to create a third object (the effect). She also holds that this account implies that causes are synchronous with their effects. There is a single instant in which the objects that are causes combine to create the object which is their effect. Hume argues that cause and effect cannot be synchronous because if they were then the entire chain of successive causes and effects would all collapse into a single moment, and succession would not be possible. I argue that Shepherd has a ready, although implicit response, to Hume’s argument. Since causation is combination on Shepherd’s view, she is free to hold that there are times in between those instants in which combinations occur, during which times other, non-combinatory changes (such as changes in the location of objects) occur, which changes account for succession.https://jmphil.org/article/id/2131/ShepherdHumeCausationSimultaneity |
spellingShingle | David Landy A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous Journal of Modern Philosophy Shepherd Hume Causation Simultaneity |
title | A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous |
title_full | A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous |
title_fullStr | A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous |
title_full_unstemmed | A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous |
title_short | A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous |
title_sort | defense of shepherd s account of cause and effect as synchronous |
topic | Shepherd Hume Causation Simultaneity |
url | https://jmphil.org/article/id/2131/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidlandy adefenseofshepherdsaccountofcauseandeffectassynchronous AT davidlandy defenseofshepherdsaccountofcauseandeffectassynchronous |