Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in Practice

There appears to be a disconnect between current guidelines for Helicobacter pylori testing and treatment, and clinical practice, including physician beliefs and actual prescribing patterns. In particular, there are markedly different approaches in primary and secondary care, and country- specific d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicholas J Talley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/401397
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555962990329856
author Nicholas J Talley
author_facet Nicholas J Talley
author_sort Nicholas J Talley
collection DOAJ
description There appears to be a disconnect between current guidelines for Helicobacter pylori testing and treatment, and clinical practice, including physician beliefs and actual prescribing patterns. In particular, there are markedly different approaches in primary and secondary care, and country- specific differences in eradication therapy for H pylori infection. Although most physicians do not believe that H pylori causes nonulcer dyspepsia, the majority appear to prescribe eradication. Less information is available on the management of H pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease, and more marked differences in attitudes and practice occur in this condition. Even in peptic ulcer disease, where most clinicians both in primary and in secondary care believe H pylori should be eradicated, there is often a breakdown in the translation of this belief into practice. There is also confusion in terms of treatment regimens applied for H pylori eradication. Eradication regimens are less successful in practice than in clinical trials. Furthermore, a sizable proportion of patients with peptic ulcer remain symptomatic despite cure of the ulcer diathesis, which may undermine confidence. Therapeutic confusion about what to prescribe, side effects limiting compliance, bacterial resistance, and socioeconomic factors may all impair therapeutic success with eradication therapy in practice. Unfortunately, it has been well documented that guidelines alone are likely to have little or no impact in practice. Publication in a journal is unlikely to lead to effective implementation in primary care. On the basis of available evidence, clinical behaviour is most likely changed when guidelines are developed by the peer group of clinicians for whom they were intended, are disseminated through a specific educational program, and are implemented by applying, preferably during the consultation, specific reminders.
format Article
id doaj-art-e210cd964b6c406485fe442f277c4f11
institution Kabale University
issn 0835-7900
language English
publishDate 2003-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
spelling doaj-art-e210cd964b6c406485fe442f277c4f112025-02-03T05:46:45ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79002003-01-0117Suppl B21B24B10.1155/2003/401397Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in PracticeNicholas J Talley0Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, New South Wales, AustraliaThere appears to be a disconnect between current guidelines for Helicobacter pylori testing and treatment, and clinical practice, including physician beliefs and actual prescribing patterns. In particular, there are markedly different approaches in primary and secondary care, and country- specific differences in eradication therapy for H pylori infection. Although most physicians do not believe that H pylori causes nonulcer dyspepsia, the majority appear to prescribe eradication. Less information is available on the management of H pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease, and more marked differences in attitudes and practice occur in this condition. Even in peptic ulcer disease, where most clinicians both in primary and in secondary care believe H pylori should be eradicated, there is often a breakdown in the translation of this belief into practice. There is also confusion in terms of treatment regimens applied for H pylori eradication. Eradication regimens are less successful in practice than in clinical trials. Furthermore, a sizable proportion of patients with peptic ulcer remain symptomatic despite cure of the ulcer diathesis, which may undermine confidence. Therapeutic confusion about what to prescribe, side effects limiting compliance, bacterial resistance, and socioeconomic factors may all impair therapeutic success with eradication therapy in practice. Unfortunately, it has been well documented that guidelines alone are likely to have little or no impact in practice. Publication in a journal is unlikely to lead to effective implementation in primary care. On the basis of available evidence, clinical behaviour is most likely changed when guidelines are developed by the peer group of clinicians for whom they were intended, are disseminated through a specific educational program, and are implemented by applying, preferably during the consultation, specific reminders.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/401397
spellingShingle Nicholas J Talley
Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in Practice
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
title Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in Practice
title_full Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in Practice
title_fullStr Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in Practice
title_full_unstemmed Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in Practice
title_short Helicobacter pylori Management: How to Improve the Therapeutic Confusion in Practice
title_sort helicobacter pylori management how to improve the therapeutic confusion in practice
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/401397
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasjtalley helicobacterpylorimanagementhowtoimprovethetherapeuticconfusioninpractice