Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments

Abstract The World Health Organization has confirmed that asbestos fibres are carcinogenic, claiming that asbestos-related diseases should be eradicated worldwide. Actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite, chrysotile, crocidolite, and tremolite are regulated asbestiform mineral phases. However, in nature,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastiano La Maestra, Gaia M. Militello, Stefano Alberti, Mirko Benvenuti, Laura Gaggero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86325-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571759606366208
author Sebastiano La Maestra
Gaia M. Militello
Stefano Alberti
Mirko Benvenuti
Laura Gaggero
author_facet Sebastiano La Maestra
Gaia M. Militello
Stefano Alberti
Mirko Benvenuti
Laura Gaggero
author_sort Sebastiano La Maestra
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The World Health Organization has confirmed that asbestos fibres are carcinogenic, claiming that asbestos-related diseases should be eradicated worldwide. Actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite, chrysotile, crocidolite, and tremolite are regulated asbestiform mineral phases. However, in nature, asbestos minerals occur either in a fibrous and asbestiform (original morphology characterized by high length-to-width ratio and provided of high tensile strength and flexibility) or fibrous but not asbestiform appearance. This study used human epithelial cancer cells (A549) and a mouse fibroblast cell line (Balb/c 3T3) to compare the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of a sample of amphibole asbestos with samples of fibrous not asbestiform named cleavage fragments (CV) obtained by grinding non-asbestiform amphiboles. The results showed that exposure of alveolar lung cells to asbestos and elongated mineral particles, in the habit of cleavage fragments (CF) derived from the grinding of non-asbestiform amphiboles and serpentines, causes cytotoxic effects, oxidative stress and genotoxic damage. Moreover, CF obtained from an actinolite schist induces a transformation effect in the Balb/c 3T3 model. Together, these findings highlight the importance of considering CF as a potential threat to human health since it can cause genotoxic damage by triggering cellular transformation processes that overlap with the mechanisms involved in the carcinogenesis processes of asbestos.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1f57279f432479d8ee16847e3d43077
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-e1f57279f432479d8ee16847e3d430772025-02-02T12:21:12ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-86325-zEvaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragmentsSebastiano La Maestra0Gaia M. Militello1Stefano Alberti2Mirko Benvenuti3Laura Gaggero4Department of Health Sciences, University of GenoaDepartment of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences, University of GenoaDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of GenoaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of GenoaDepartment of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences, University of GenoaAbstract The World Health Organization has confirmed that asbestos fibres are carcinogenic, claiming that asbestos-related diseases should be eradicated worldwide. Actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite, chrysotile, crocidolite, and tremolite are regulated asbestiform mineral phases. However, in nature, asbestos minerals occur either in a fibrous and asbestiform (original morphology characterized by high length-to-width ratio and provided of high tensile strength and flexibility) or fibrous but not asbestiform appearance. This study used human epithelial cancer cells (A549) and a mouse fibroblast cell line (Balb/c 3T3) to compare the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of a sample of amphibole asbestos with samples of fibrous not asbestiform named cleavage fragments (CV) obtained by grinding non-asbestiform amphiboles. The results showed that exposure of alveolar lung cells to asbestos and elongated mineral particles, in the habit of cleavage fragments (CF) derived from the grinding of non-asbestiform amphiboles and serpentines, causes cytotoxic effects, oxidative stress and genotoxic damage. Moreover, CF obtained from an actinolite schist induces a transformation effect in the Balb/c 3T3 model. Together, these findings highlight the importance of considering CF as a potential threat to human health since it can cause genotoxic damage by triggering cellular transformation processes that overlap with the mechanisms involved in the carcinogenesis processes of asbestos.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86325-zElongated mineral particlesCleavage fragmentsNon-asbestiform amphibolesFibresGenotoxicity and oxidative stressCarcinogenic potential
spellingShingle Sebastiano La Maestra
Gaia M. Militello
Stefano Alberti
Mirko Benvenuti
Laura Gaggero
Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments
Scientific Reports
Elongated mineral particles
Cleavage fragments
Non-asbestiform amphiboles
Fibres
Genotoxicity and oxidative stress
Carcinogenic potential
title Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments
title_full Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments
title_fullStr Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments
title_short Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments
title_sort evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments
topic Elongated mineral particles
Cleavage fragments
Non-asbestiform amphiboles
Fibres
Genotoxicity and oxidative stress
Carcinogenic potential
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86325-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianolamaestra evaluationofthegenotoxicandtransformationpotentialinducedbyasbestoscomparedtocleavagefragments
AT gaiammilitello evaluationofthegenotoxicandtransformationpotentialinducedbyasbestoscomparedtocleavagefragments
AT stefanoalberti evaluationofthegenotoxicandtransformationpotentialinducedbyasbestoscomparedtocleavagefragments
AT mirkobenvenuti evaluationofthegenotoxicandtransformationpotentialinducedbyasbestoscomparedtocleavagefragments
AT lauragaggero evaluationofthegenotoxicandtransformationpotentialinducedbyasbestoscomparedtocleavagefragments