Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks
Wet meadows are globally significant ecosystems that provide critical hydrological, ecological, and biogeochemical functions, yet their extent has declined dramatically due to land use changes and hydrologic alteration. These sedge-dominated wetlands exist at the drier end of the wetland gradient, m...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1592036/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849700917747646464 |
|---|---|
| author | Michael M. Pollock Laura M. Norman |
| author_facet | Michael M. Pollock Laura M. Norman |
| author_sort | Michael M. Pollock |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Wet meadows are globally significant ecosystems that provide critical hydrological, ecological, and biogeochemical functions, yet their extent has declined dramatically due to land use changes and hydrologic alteration. These sedge-dominated wetlands exist at the drier end of the wetland gradient, maintained by shallow groundwater and periodic inundation. This paper is a global synthesis of the ecological, geomorphic, and hydrological dynamics of wet meadows, with an emphasis on alluvial systems, to inform effective restoration strategies. We compare wet meadows to other wetlands, classify them into palustrine, lacustrine, and alluvial types, then focus on alluvial wet meadows and discuss how their formation and persistence depend on ground and surface water interactions, sediment deposition and flow obstructions, all mediated by biological processes. In particular, we highlight the role of hydric graminoids in resisting erosion and maintaining soil cohesion, how beaver promote meadow persistence, and the significance of wet meadows as carbon sinks. We also present stratigraphic evidence demonstrating that incision, often triggered by anthropogenic activity or changing climate, is the primary mechanism of alluvial wet meadow degradation, resulting in water table decline and shifts in vegetation composition. Restoration requires reversing these incisional processes through techniques that elevate water tables, disperse flow and retain sediment—methods traditionally associated with either soil conservation or stream restoration. These include nature-based solutions that create obstructions such as beaver dams and their analogues, rock and wood-based obstructions and incision trench or gully filling and grading. Given their multifunctional value—including but not limited to flood attenuation, biodiversity support, and carbon sequestration—wet meadows warrant a focused restoration framework. This review advocates for a valley-floor scale restoration paradigm that integrates hydrological reconnection, sediment retention, and biological reinforcement to ensure long-term resilience of these systems in the face of changing climate and land use pressures. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e1f4eeca596f48b580a086a203fa1e80 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2296-665X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-e1f4eeca596f48b580a086a203fa1e802025-08-20T03:18:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2025-07-011310.3389/fenvs.2025.15920361592036Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacksMichael M. Pollock0Laura M. Norman1Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, WA, United StatesUnited States Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Tucson, AZ, United StatesWet meadows are globally significant ecosystems that provide critical hydrological, ecological, and biogeochemical functions, yet their extent has declined dramatically due to land use changes and hydrologic alteration. These sedge-dominated wetlands exist at the drier end of the wetland gradient, maintained by shallow groundwater and periodic inundation. This paper is a global synthesis of the ecological, geomorphic, and hydrological dynamics of wet meadows, with an emphasis on alluvial systems, to inform effective restoration strategies. We compare wet meadows to other wetlands, classify them into palustrine, lacustrine, and alluvial types, then focus on alluvial wet meadows and discuss how their formation and persistence depend on ground and surface water interactions, sediment deposition and flow obstructions, all mediated by biological processes. In particular, we highlight the role of hydric graminoids in resisting erosion and maintaining soil cohesion, how beaver promote meadow persistence, and the significance of wet meadows as carbon sinks. We also present stratigraphic evidence demonstrating that incision, often triggered by anthropogenic activity or changing climate, is the primary mechanism of alluvial wet meadow degradation, resulting in water table decline and shifts in vegetation composition. Restoration requires reversing these incisional processes through techniques that elevate water tables, disperse flow and retain sediment—methods traditionally associated with either soil conservation or stream restoration. These include nature-based solutions that create obstructions such as beaver dams and their analogues, rock and wood-based obstructions and incision trench or gully filling and grading. Given their multifunctional value—including but not limited to flood attenuation, biodiversity support, and carbon sequestration—wet meadows warrant a focused restoration framework. This review advocates for a valley-floor scale restoration paradigm that integrates hydrological reconnection, sediment retention, and biological reinforcement to ensure long-term resilience of these systems in the face of changing climate and land use pressures.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1592036/fullwet meadowsincisionprocess-based restorationecosystem serviceshydrologystream restoration |
| spellingShingle | Michael M. Pollock Laura M. Norman Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks Frontiers in Environmental Science wet meadows incision process-based restoration ecosystem services hydrology stream restoration |
| title | Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks |
| title_full | Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks |
| title_fullStr | Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks |
| title_full_unstemmed | Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks |
| title_short | Wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks |
| title_sort | wet meadow regeneration through restoration of biophysical feedbacks |
| topic | wet meadows incision process-based restoration ecosystem services hydrology stream restoration |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1592036/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelmpollock wetmeadowregenerationthroughrestorationofbiophysicalfeedbacks AT lauramnorman wetmeadowregenerationthroughrestorationofbiophysicalfeedbacks |