Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T

Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) for carotid artery stenosis evaluation at 3T. Material and Methods. Twenty-three patients (5 f, 18 m; mean age 61 y, age range 45–78 y) with intern...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivan Platzek, Dominik Sieron, Philipp Wiggermann, Michael Laniado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Radiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/508715
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560354143502336
author Ivan Platzek
Dominik Sieron
Philipp Wiggermann
Michael Laniado
author_facet Ivan Platzek
Dominik Sieron
Philipp Wiggermann
Michael Laniado
author_sort Ivan Platzek
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) for carotid artery stenosis evaluation at 3T. Material and Methods. Twenty-three patients (5 f, 18 m; mean age 61 y, age range 45–78 y) with internal carotid artery stenosis detected with ultrasonography were examined on a 3.0T MR system. The MR examination included both 3D TOF MRA and CEMRA of the carotid arteries. MR images were evaluated independently by two board-certified radiologists. Stenosis evaluation was based on a five-point scale. Stenosis grades determined by TOF and CEMRA were compared using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon test. Cohen’s Kappa was used to evaluate interrater reliability. Results. CEMRA detected stenosis in 24 (52%) of 46 carotids evaluated, while TOF detected stenosis in 27 (59%) of 46 carotids. TOF MRA yielded significantly higher results for stenosis grade in comparison to CEMRA (P=0.014). Interrater agreement was very good for both TOF MRA (κ=0.93) and CEMRA (κ=0.93). Conclusion. At 3T, 3D TOF MRA should not be used as replacement for contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries, as it results in significantly higher stenosis grades.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1a8542cee7640ce80fae4e94ebfc67b
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1941
2090-195X
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Radiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-e1a8542cee7640ce80fae4e94ebfc67b2025-02-03T01:27:52ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-19412090-195X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/508715508715Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3TIvan Platzek0Dominik Sieron1Philipp Wiggermann2Michael Laniado3Department of Radiology, Dresden University Hospital, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, District Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ulica Bytomska 62, 41-941 Piekary Śląskie, PolandDepartment of Radiology, Regensburg University Medical Center, Franz-Joseph-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, Dresden University Hospital, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, GermanyPurpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) for carotid artery stenosis evaluation at 3T. Material and Methods. Twenty-three patients (5 f, 18 m; mean age 61 y, age range 45–78 y) with internal carotid artery stenosis detected with ultrasonography were examined on a 3.0T MR system. The MR examination included both 3D TOF MRA and CEMRA of the carotid arteries. MR images were evaluated independently by two board-certified radiologists. Stenosis evaluation was based on a five-point scale. Stenosis grades determined by TOF and CEMRA were compared using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon test. Cohen’s Kappa was used to evaluate interrater reliability. Results. CEMRA detected stenosis in 24 (52%) of 46 carotids evaluated, while TOF detected stenosis in 27 (59%) of 46 carotids. TOF MRA yielded significantly higher results for stenosis grade in comparison to CEMRA (P=0.014). Interrater agreement was very good for both TOF MRA (κ=0.93) and CEMRA (κ=0.93). Conclusion. At 3T, 3D TOF MRA should not be used as replacement for contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries, as it results in significantly higher stenosis grades.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/508715
spellingShingle Ivan Platzek
Dominik Sieron
Philipp Wiggermann
Michael Laniado
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
Radiology Research and Practice
title Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
title_full Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
title_fullStr Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
title_full_unstemmed Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
title_short Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
title_sort carotid artery stenosis comparison of 3d time of flight mr angiography and contrast enhanced mr angiography at 3t
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/508715
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanplatzek carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t
AT dominiksieron carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t
AT philippwiggermann carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t
AT michaellaniado carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t