Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) for carotid artery stenosis evaluation at 3T. Material and Methods. Twenty-three patients (5 f, 18 m; mean age 61 y, age range 45–78 y) with intern...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Radiology Research and Practice |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/508715 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832560354143502336 |
---|---|
author | Ivan Platzek Dominik Sieron Philipp Wiggermann Michael Laniado |
author_facet | Ivan Platzek Dominik Sieron Philipp Wiggermann Michael Laniado |
author_sort | Ivan Platzek |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) for carotid artery stenosis evaluation at 3T. Material and Methods. Twenty-three patients (5 f, 18 m; mean age 61 y, age range 45–78 y) with internal carotid artery stenosis detected with ultrasonography were examined on a 3.0T MR system. The MR examination included both 3D TOF MRA and CEMRA of the carotid arteries. MR images were evaluated independently by two board-certified radiologists. Stenosis evaluation was based on a five-point scale. Stenosis grades determined by TOF and CEMRA were compared using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon test. Cohen’s Kappa was used to evaluate interrater reliability. Results. CEMRA detected stenosis in 24 (52%) of 46 carotids evaluated, while TOF detected stenosis in 27 (59%) of 46 carotids. TOF MRA yielded significantly higher results for stenosis grade in comparison to CEMRA (P=0.014). Interrater agreement was very good for both TOF MRA (κ=0.93) and CEMRA (κ=0.93). Conclusion. At 3T, 3D TOF MRA should not be used as replacement for contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries, as it results in significantly higher stenosis grades. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-e1a8542cee7640ce80fae4e94ebfc67b |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-1941 2090-195X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Radiology Research and Practice |
spelling | doaj-art-e1a8542cee7640ce80fae4e94ebfc67b2025-02-03T01:27:52ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-19412090-195X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/508715508715Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3TIvan Platzek0Dominik Sieron1Philipp Wiggermann2Michael Laniado3Department of Radiology, Dresden University Hospital, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, District Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ulica Bytomska 62, 41-941 Piekary Śląskie, PolandDepartment of Radiology, Regensburg University Medical Center, Franz-Joseph-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, Dresden University Hospital, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, GermanyPurpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) for carotid artery stenosis evaluation at 3T. Material and Methods. Twenty-three patients (5 f, 18 m; mean age 61 y, age range 45–78 y) with internal carotid artery stenosis detected with ultrasonography were examined on a 3.0T MR system. The MR examination included both 3D TOF MRA and CEMRA of the carotid arteries. MR images were evaluated independently by two board-certified radiologists. Stenosis evaluation was based on a five-point scale. Stenosis grades determined by TOF and CEMRA were compared using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon test. Cohen’s Kappa was used to evaluate interrater reliability. Results. CEMRA detected stenosis in 24 (52%) of 46 carotids evaluated, while TOF detected stenosis in 27 (59%) of 46 carotids. TOF MRA yielded significantly higher results for stenosis grade in comparison to CEMRA (P=0.014). Interrater agreement was very good for both TOF MRA (κ=0.93) and CEMRA (κ=0.93). Conclusion. At 3T, 3D TOF MRA should not be used as replacement for contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries, as it results in significantly higher stenosis grades.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/508715 |
spellingShingle | Ivan Platzek Dominik Sieron Philipp Wiggermann Michael Laniado Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T Radiology Research and Practice |
title | Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T |
title_full | Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T |
title_fullStr | Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T |
title_full_unstemmed | Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T |
title_short | Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T |
title_sort | carotid artery stenosis comparison of 3d time of flight mr angiography and contrast enhanced mr angiography at 3t |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/508715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ivanplatzek carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t AT dominiksieron carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t AT philippwiggermann carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t AT michaellaniado carotidarterystenosiscomparisonof3dtimeofflightmrangiographyandcontrastenhancedmrangiographyat3t |