Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMR

ABSTRACT Pulmonary artery (PA) flow analysis is crucial for understanding the progression of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We hypothesized that PA flow characteristics vary according to PH etiology. In this study, we used 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to compare PA flow velo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bong‐Joon Kim, Jeesoo Lee, Haben Berhane, Benjamin H. Freed, Sanjiv J. Shah, James D. Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70022
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849338571214815232
author Bong‐Joon Kim
Jeesoo Lee
Haben Berhane
Benjamin H. Freed
Sanjiv J. Shah
James D. Thomas
author_facet Bong‐Joon Kim
Jeesoo Lee
Haben Berhane
Benjamin H. Freed
Sanjiv J. Shah
James D. Thomas
author_sort Bong‐Joon Kim
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Pulmonary artery (PA) flow analysis is crucial for understanding the progression of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We hypothesized that PA flow characteristics vary according to PH etiology. In this study, we used 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to compare PA flow velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) between patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension (PH‐HFpEF). We enrolled 13 PAH and 15 PH‐HFpEF patients. All participants underwent echocardiography, 4D flow CMR, and right heart catheterization. We compared right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) flow and main pulmonary artery (MPA) hemodynamics, including peak velocity and mean and maximum WSS, between groups. PH‐HFpEF patients were older and more likely to have hypertension. PAH patients had higher mean PA pressure (47.8 ± 8.8 vs. 32.9 ± 6.9 mmHg, p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (8.6 ± 4.6 vs. 2.6 ± 2.2 wood unit, p < 0.001). RVOT systolic notching was more common in PAH patients (8 of 13 vs. 0 of 15), and they had shorter RVOT acceleration time (85.5 ± 20.9 vs. 135.0 ± 21.7 ms, p < 0.001). PAH patients had lower MPA Vmax (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 1.1 ± 0.4 m/s, p = 0.032), mean WSS (0.29 ± 0.09 vs. 0.36 ± 0.06 Pa, p = 0.035), and maximal WSS (0.99 ± 0.18 vs. 1.21 ± 0.19 Pa, p = 0.011). Anterior MPA analysis confirmed lower WSS in PAH patients. PVR was negatively correlated with MPA mean WSS (r = −0.630, p = 0.002). PAH patients had lower MPA Vmax and lower mean MPA WSS in 4D flow CMR compared to PH‐HFpEF patients. These distinct PA flow characteristics suggest that the flow hemodynamics of the PA remodeling process differ depending on the underlying etiology of PH.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1a182d9c07c4aa8a2a6a29313b59ff5
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-8940
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Circulation
spelling doaj-art-e1a182d9c07c4aa8a2a6a29313b59ff52025-08-20T03:44:21ZengWileyPulmonary Circulation2045-89402025-01-01151n/an/a10.1002/pul2.70022Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMRBong‐Joon Kim0Jeesoo Lee1Haben Berhane2Benjamin H. Freed3Sanjiv J. Shah4James D. Thomas5Division of Cardiology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USADivision of Radiology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USADivision of Radiology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USADivision of Cardiology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USADivision of Cardiology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USADivision of Cardiology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USAABSTRACT Pulmonary artery (PA) flow analysis is crucial for understanding the progression of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We hypothesized that PA flow characteristics vary according to PH etiology. In this study, we used 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to compare PA flow velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) between patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension (PH‐HFpEF). We enrolled 13 PAH and 15 PH‐HFpEF patients. All participants underwent echocardiography, 4D flow CMR, and right heart catheterization. We compared right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) flow and main pulmonary artery (MPA) hemodynamics, including peak velocity and mean and maximum WSS, between groups. PH‐HFpEF patients were older and more likely to have hypertension. PAH patients had higher mean PA pressure (47.8 ± 8.8 vs. 32.9 ± 6.9 mmHg, p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (8.6 ± 4.6 vs. 2.6 ± 2.2 wood unit, p < 0.001). RVOT systolic notching was more common in PAH patients (8 of 13 vs. 0 of 15), and they had shorter RVOT acceleration time (85.5 ± 20.9 vs. 135.0 ± 21.7 ms, p < 0.001). PAH patients had lower MPA Vmax (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 1.1 ± 0.4 m/s, p = 0.032), mean WSS (0.29 ± 0.09 vs. 0.36 ± 0.06 Pa, p = 0.035), and maximal WSS (0.99 ± 0.18 vs. 1.21 ± 0.19 Pa, p = 0.011). Anterior MPA analysis confirmed lower WSS in PAH patients. PVR was negatively correlated with MPA mean WSS (r = −0.630, p = 0.002). PAH patients had lower MPA Vmax and lower mean MPA WSS in 4D flow CMR compared to PH‐HFpEF patients. These distinct PA flow characteristics suggest that the flow hemodynamics of the PA remodeling process differ depending on the underlying etiology of PH.https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.700224D‐flow CMRheart failure with preserved ejection fraction with pulmonary hypertensionpulmonary arterial hypertensionpulmonary artery flow hemodynamics
spellingShingle Bong‐Joon Kim
Jeesoo Lee
Haben Berhane
Benjamin H. Freed
Sanjiv J. Shah
James D. Thomas
Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMR
Pulmonary Circulation
4D‐flow CMR
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with pulmonary hypertension
pulmonary arterial hypertension
pulmonary artery flow hemodynamics
title Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMR
title_full Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMR
title_fullStr Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMR
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMR
title_short Differences in Pulmonary Artery Flow Hemodynamics Between PAH and PH‐HFpEF: Insights From 4D‐Flow CMR
title_sort differences in pulmonary artery flow hemodynamics between pah and ph hfpef insights from 4d flow cmr
topic 4D‐flow CMR
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with pulmonary hypertension
pulmonary arterial hypertension
pulmonary artery flow hemodynamics
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70022
work_keys_str_mv AT bongjoonkim differencesinpulmonaryarteryflowhemodynamicsbetweenpahandphhfpefinsightsfrom4dflowcmr
AT jeesoolee differencesinpulmonaryarteryflowhemodynamicsbetweenpahandphhfpefinsightsfrom4dflowcmr
AT habenberhane differencesinpulmonaryarteryflowhemodynamicsbetweenpahandphhfpefinsightsfrom4dflowcmr
AT benjaminhfreed differencesinpulmonaryarteryflowhemodynamicsbetweenpahandphhfpefinsightsfrom4dflowcmr
AT sanjivjshah differencesinpulmonaryarteryflowhemodynamicsbetweenpahandphhfpefinsightsfrom4dflowcmr
AT jamesdthomas differencesinpulmonaryarteryflowhemodynamicsbetweenpahandphhfpefinsightsfrom4dflowcmr