A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences

As the externalized carrier of intrinsic value, value decision-making is an important factor affecting the social value system. As an old Chinese saying goes, “A friend in need is a friend indeed,” crisis environment provides the background for the conflicts of multiple values, while individual soci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu Shi, Lu-yun Qiu, Zhi-geng Fang, Xia-qing Liu, Yang-yang Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6530847
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567342335262720
author Xu Shi
Lu-yun Qiu
Zhi-geng Fang
Xia-qing Liu
Yang-yang Du
author_facet Xu Shi
Lu-yun Qiu
Zhi-geng Fang
Xia-qing Liu
Yang-yang Du
author_sort Xu Shi
collection DOAJ
description As the externalized carrier of intrinsic value, value decision-making is an important factor affecting the social value system. As an old Chinese saying goes, “A friend in need is a friend indeed,” crisis environment provides the background for the conflicts of multiple values, while individual social value orientation (SVO) determines the ranking of the value states. This paper defined the SVO types by means of Slider Measure method on the basis of environment description, constructed a decision-making game model in accordance with SVO differences, and finally analysed the mechanism of people’s decision-making. Taking the epidemic situation as the background, this paper conducted an empirical analysis with the sample of college students. The results showed that the most SVO types of college students were prosocial orientation, followed by individualistic orientation, altruistic orientation, and competitive orientation. In the crisis environment, individual SVO type and decision-making constituted a mapping relationship. There was an equilibrium point in the decision of prosocial orientation, and the dominant decision of altruistic orientation or individualistic orientation is relatively stable.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1914bdc967344b6b79418ed937c3b0f
institution Kabale University
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Complexity
spelling doaj-art-e1914bdc967344b6b79418ed937c3b0f2025-02-03T01:01:52ZengWileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262020-01-01202010.1155/2020/65308476530847A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO DifferencesXu Shi0Lu-yun Qiu1Zhi-geng Fang2Xia-qing Liu3Yang-yang Du4Student Affairs Office, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, ChinaCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, ChinaCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, ChinaCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, ChinaCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, ChinaAs the externalized carrier of intrinsic value, value decision-making is an important factor affecting the social value system. As an old Chinese saying goes, “A friend in need is a friend indeed,” crisis environment provides the background for the conflicts of multiple values, while individual social value orientation (SVO) determines the ranking of the value states. This paper defined the SVO types by means of Slider Measure method on the basis of environment description, constructed a decision-making game model in accordance with SVO differences, and finally analysed the mechanism of people’s decision-making. Taking the epidemic situation as the background, this paper conducted an empirical analysis with the sample of college students. The results showed that the most SVO types of college students were prosocial orientation, followed by individualistic orientation, altruistic orientation, and competitive orientation. In the crisis environment, individual SVO type and decision-making constituted a mapping relationship. There was an equilibrium point in the decision of prosocial orientation, and the dominant decision of altruistic orientation or individualistic orientation is relatively stable.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6530847
spellingShingle Xu Shi
Lu-yun Qiu
Zhi-geng Fang
Xia-qing Liu
Yang-yang Du
A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences
Complexity
title A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences
title_full A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences
title_fullStr A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences
title_full_unstemmed A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences
title_short A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences
title_sort game mechanism of individual value decision making based on svo differences
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6530847
work_keys_str_mv AT xushi agamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT luyunqiu agamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT zhigengfang agamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT xiaqingliu agamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT yangyangdu agamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT xushi gamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT luyunqiu gamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT zhigengfang gamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT xiaqingliu gamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences
AT yangyangdu gamemechanismofindividualvaluedecisionmakingbasedonsvodifferences