Traduire c’est produire
The productivity of translation is exemplified in this article by an analysis of the French and German feminist gender debates. In the first part, gender in translation is examined in its connection to nationalism, more specifically at the example of the untranslatable. In the following, potentials...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Association Genres, sexualités, langage
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Glad! |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/glad/1991 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832580994418343936 |
|---|---|
| author | Cornelia Möser |
| author_facet | Cornelia Möser |
| author_sort | Cornelia Möser |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The productivity of translation is exemplified in this article by an analysis of the French and German feminist gender debates. In the first part, gender in translation is examined in its connection to nationalism, more specifically at the example of the untranslatable. In the following, potentials of agency in translation are drawn from the analysis of the feminist gender debates that are discussed in this perspective. Feminist research turns out to be a particularly instructive site for understanding the productivity of translation, yet this productivity is not automatically liberatory. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e17449ca0be1459183089bc31478153a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2551-0819 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Association Genres, sexualités, langage |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Glad! |
| spelling | doaj-art-e17449ca0be1459183089bc31478153a2025-01-30T10:37:52ZfraAssociation Genres, sexualités, langageGlad!2551-08192020-12-01910.4000/glad.1991Traduire c’est produireCornelia MöserThe productivity of translation is exemplified in this article by an analysis of the French and German feminist gender debates. In the first part, gender in translation is examined in its connection to nationalism, more specifically at the example of the untranslatable. In the following, potentials of agency in translation are drawn from the analysis of the feminist gender debates that are discussed in this perspective. Feminist research turns out to be a particularly instructive site for understanding the productivity of translation, yet this productivity is not automatically liberatory.https://journals.openedition.org/glad/1991Francegender turntravelling theoriesGermanydeconstructivism |
| spellingShingle | Cornelia Möser Traduire c’est produire Glad! France gender turn travelling theories Germany deconstructivism |
| title | Traduire c’est produire |
| title_full | Traduire c’est produire |
| title_fullStr | Traduire c’est produire |
| title_full_unstemmed | Traduire c’est produire |
| title_short | Traduire c’est produire |
| title_sort | traduire c est produire |
| topic | France gender turn travelling theories Germany deconstructivism |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/glad/1991 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT corneliamoser traduirecestproduire |