Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements

ABSTRACT Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land‐intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bethany Blakely, Caitlin E. Moore, Taylor L. Pederson, Christy D. Gibson, Michael C. Benson, Evan Dracup, Carl J. Bernacchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:GCB Bioenergy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70026
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land‐intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi‐year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha−1 for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha−1 for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha−1 for maize‐soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for sorghum‐soy. Using maize‐soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m−2 of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m−2. When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies.
ISSN:1757-1693
1757-1707