Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature Review

Background. Endoscopic dilation of postlaryngectomy strictures (PLS) is safe and effective; however, PLS are often refractory and require serial dilations. Long-term outcomes of dilation in patients with refractory PLS are not well reported. Materials and Methods. Seven patients with dysphagia and r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick L. Stoner, Amy L. Fullerton, Alyssa M. Freeman, Neil N. Chheda, David S. Estores
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8905615
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554185359360000
author Patrick L. Stoner
Amy L. Fullerton
Alyssa M. Freeman
Neil N. Chheda
David S. Estores
author_facet Patrick L. Stoner
Amy L. Fullerton
Alyssa M. Freeman
Neil N. Chheda
David S. Estores
author_sort Patrick L. Stoner
collection DOAJ
description Background. Endoscopic dilation of postlaryngectomy strictures (PLS) is safe and effective; however, PLS are often refractory and require serial dilations. Long-term outcomes of dilation in patients with refractory PLS are not well reported. Materials and Methods. Seven patients with dysphagia and refractory PLS underwent serial endoscopic dilation therapy during a 4.5-year period. Dilation characteristics, technical success, clinical success, and diet advancement (as assessed by Diet/GT scale) were measured. Results. All strictures were complex, and there were no reported complications. The median number of dilations per patient was 12 (range 7 to 48). The average interval in between dilations was six weeks. Technical success was achieved in 6/7 patients, and clinical success was achieved in 2/7 patients. 6/7 patients had advancements in Diet/GT scores. Conclusions. Dilation of refractory PLS is safe and effective and frequently requires the use of a retrograde approach, fluoroscopic guidance, and/or lumen patency strings. Serial dilations are required to maintain luminal patency, relieve dysphagia, and advance oral diet. The definition of clinical success of dilation in these patients should avoid the use of a specific time interval between dilations to characterize success.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0ee73c92fec4a9aa12b0ef5cc9ab0a2
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-e0ee73c92fec4a9aa12b0ef5cc9ab0a22025-02-03T05:52:14ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2019-01-01201910.1155/2019/89056158905615Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature ReviewPatrick L. Stoner0Amy L. Fullerton1Alyssa M. Freeman2Neil N. Chheda3David S. Estores4Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USASpeech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USASpeech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USAOtolaryngology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USAGastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USABackground. Endoscopic dilation of postlaryngectomy strictures (PLS) is safe and effective; however, PLS are often refractory and require serial dilations. Long-term outcomes of dilation in patients with refractory PLS are not well reported. Materials and Methods. Seven patients with dysphagia and refractory PLS underwent serial endoscopic dilation therapy during a 4.5-year period. Dilation characteristics, technical success, clinical success, and diet advancement (as assessed by Diet/GT scale) were measured. Results. All strictures were complex, and there were no reported complications. The median number of dilations per patient was 12 (range 7 to 48). The average interval in between dilations was six weeks. Technical success was achieved in 6/7 patients, and clinical success was achieved in 2/7 patients. 6/7 patients had advancements in Diet/GT scores. Conclusions. Dilation of refractory PLS is safe and effective and frequently requires the use of a retrograde approach, fluoroscopic guidance, and/or lumen patency strings. Serial dilations are required to maintain luminal patency, relieve dysphagia, and advance oral diet. The definition of clinical success of dilation in these patients should avoid the use of a specific time interval between dilations to characterize success.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8905615
spellingShingle Patrick L. Stoner
Amy L. Fullerton
Alyssa M. Freeman
Neil N. Chheda
David S. Estores
Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature Review
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature Review
title_full Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature Review
title_fullStr Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature Review
title_short Endoscopic Dilation of Refractory Postlaryngectomy Strictures: A Case Series and Literature Review
title_sort endoscopic dilation of refractory postlaryngectomy strictures a case series and literature review
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8905615
work_keys_str_mv AT patricklstoner endoscopicdilationofrefractorypostlaryngectomystricturesacaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT amylfullerton endoscopicdilationofrefractorypostlaryngectomystricturesacaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT alyssamfreeman endoscopicdilationofrefractorypostlaryngectomystricturesacaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT neilnchheda endoscopicdilationofrefractorypostlaryngectomystricturesacaseseriesandliteraturereview
AT davidsestores endoscopicdilationofrefractorypostlaryngectomystricturesacaseseriesandliteraturereview