Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Conclusion: The sheathless TR approach showed lower rates of RAS and femoral conversion. Sheathless has a higher success rate; however, it also increased RAO. Thus, more trials are needed to confirm this technique’s long-term outcomes and complications.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Zuhair Majeed, Muhammad Haider Tariq, Arslan Ahmed, Muhammad Usama, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Abira Khan, Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa, Muhammad Faiq Umar, Mustafa Turkmani, Mohamed Abuelazm, Ubaid Khan |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/2777585 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Safety and feasibility of directional coronary atherectomy with transradial approach using an 8Fr sheathless guiding catheter
by: Tsuyoshi Ota, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Abstract 054: Transradial Thrombectomy Using "Sheathless PV" Guide Catheter in Armenia: Three‐Year Institutional Experience in 103 Cases
by: David Sahakyan, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Add‐On in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin and Dapagliflozin: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
by: Ubaid Khan, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Slender Sheath/Guiding Catheter Combination vs. Sheathless Guiding Catheter for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Two Devices
by: Tsuyoshi Isawa, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Erratum to “Slender Sheath/Guiding Catheter Combination vs. Sheathless Guiding Catheter for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Two Devices”
by: Tsuyoshi Isawa, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)