Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

Despite the affordances of professional development (PD) in teaching and learning in facilitating quality teaching and contributing to students’ learning outcomes, there is merit in exploring educators’ needs by enabling conditions to further develop their existing knowledge and practices. In fact,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seo Hong Lim, Lyndon Lim, Che Yee Lye, Wei Ying Rebekah Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Trends in Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2813-4346/4/2/16
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849432382522785792
author Seo Hong Lim
Lyndon Lim
Che Yee Lye
Wei Ying Rebekah Lim
author_facet Seo Hong Lim
Lyndon Lim
Che Yee Lye
Wei Ying Rebekah Lim
author_sort Seo Hong Lim
collection DOAJ
description Despite the affordances of professional development (PD) in teaching and learning in facilitating quality teaching and contributing to students’ learning outcomes, there is merit in exploring educators’ needs by enabling conditions to further develop their existing knowledge and practices. In fact, it is vital that PD in teaching and learning in higher education (HE) actively engages and meets instructor individual needs. This paper explores PD within the HE context and identifies corresponding categories common and in relation to quality teaching. Based on the review, most PD in teaching and learning could be identified within one of four categories that contribute to quality teaching: (1) assessment approaches; (2) instructional approaches; (3) communication and delivery approaches; and (4) affective responses. Equally important, instructor agency should be supported by encouraging instructors to identify and manage their PD needs via validated measures, which this review found lacking within the literature. With the expectation that such a measure would provide insights into the refinements of current PD in teaching and learning provisions, and enable HE institutions to facilitate PD in teaching and learning to better meet and fulfil instructor individual needs, it is recommended that such a measure be developed and deployed to identify instructors’ needs.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0dc565e5c694e558e3204a2c2ddbbaa
institution Kabale University
issn 2813-4346
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Trends in Higher Education
spelling doaj-art-e0dc565e5c694e558e3204a2c2ddbbaa2025-08-20T03:27:22ZengMDPI AGTrends in Higher Education2813-43462025-03-01421610.3390/higheredu4020016Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher EducationSeo Hong Lim0Lyndon Lim1Che Yee Lye2Wei Ying Rebekah Lim3Teaching & Learning Centre, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494, SingaporeTeaching & Learning Centre, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494, SingaporeTeaching & Learning Centre, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494, SingaporeCollege of Interdisciplinary & Experiential Learning, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494, SingaporeDespite the affordances of professional development (PD) in teaching and learning in facilitating quality teaching and contributing to students’ learning outcomes, there is merit in exploring educators’ needs by enabling conditions to further develop their existing knowledge and practices. In fact, it is vital that PD in teaching and learning in higher education (HE) actively engages and meets instructor individual needs. This paper explores PD within the HE context and identifies corresponding categories common and in relation to quality teaching. Based on the review, most PD in teaching and learning could be identified within one of four categories that contribute to quality teaching: (1) assessment approaches; (2) instructional approaches; (3) communication and delivery approaches; and (4) affective responses. Equally important, instructor agency should be supported by encouraging instructors to identify and manage their PD needs via validated measures, which this review found lacking within the literature. With the expectation that such a measure would provide insights into the refinements of current PD in teaching and learning provisions, and enable HE institutions to facilitate PD in teaching and learning to better meet and fulfil instructor individual needs, it is recommended that such a measure be developed and deployed to identify instructors’ needs.https://www.mdpi.com/2813-4346/4/2/16professional developmentquality teachinghigher educationlearning needs analysisstudent evaluation
spellingShingle Seo Hong Lim
Lyndon Lim
Che Yee Lye
Wei Ying Rebekah Lim
Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
Trends in Higher Education
professional development
quality teaching
higher education
learning needs analysis
student evaluation
title Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
title_full Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
title_fullStr Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
title_full_unstemmed Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
title_short Personalised Professional Development in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
title_sort personalised professional development in teaching and learning in higher education
topic professional development
quality teaching
higher education
learning needs analysis
student evaluation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2813-4346/4/2/16
work_keys_str_mv AT seohonglim personalisedprofessionaldevelopmentinteachingandlearninginhighereducation
AT lyndonlim personalisedprofessionaldevelopmentinteachingandlearninginhighereducation
AT cheyeelye personalisedprofessionaldevelopmentinteachingandlearninginhighereducation
AT weiyingrebekahlim personalisedprofessionaldevelopmentinteachingandlearninginhighereducation