Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that isometric exercise training reduces systolic blood pressure by approximately 8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by approximately 4 mmHg in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals. However, the prescription of isometric exercises can be b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulo Henrique de Melo, Anderson Cavalcante, Jessika Karla Tavares do Nascimento Faustino Silva, José Lucas Porto Aguiar, Jefferson Maxwell De Farias Silva, Theo Victor Alves Soares Rêgo, Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias, Breno Quintella Farah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Paulista de Medicina 2025-03-01
Series:São Paulo Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802025000200204&lng=en&tlng=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849703883162517504
author Paulo Henrique de Melo
Anderson Cavalcante
Jessika Karla Tavares do Nascimento Faustino Silva
José Lucas Porto Aguiar
Jefferson Maxwell De Farias Silva
Theo Victor Alves Soares Rêgo
Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias
Breno Quintella Farah
author_facet Paulo Henrique de Melo
Anderson Cavalcante
Jessika Karla Tavares do Nascimento Faustino Silva
José Lucas Porto Aguiar
Jefferson Maxwell De Farias Silva
Theo Victor Alves Soares Rêgo
Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias
Breno Quintella Farah
author_sort Paulo Henrique de Melo
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that isometric exercise training reduces systolic blood pressure by approximately 8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by approximately 4 mmHg in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals. However, the prescription of isometric exercises can be based on the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) or heart rate (HR) obtained during the maximal incremental isometry test. The reliability and agreement of this test have not been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the reliability and agreement indicators of HR and RPE during isometric wall squat incremental tests. DESIGN AND SETTING: A reliability and agreement study was conducted at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy subjects (54% men, 26 ± 5 years) performed two isometric wall squat incremental tests. The test began with a knee joint angle of 135° (knee and leg) progressively reduced by 10° at each stage. Each stage lasts 2 minutes or until voluntary exhaustion. The HR and RPE were obtained during the tests. Reliability and agreement were established using test-retest (paired t-test or Wilcoxon test), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The HR and RPE increased significantly during both tests. The HR and RPE at each stage were similar between the two test sessions (P > 0.05). Both HRmax (ICC: 0.695, P = 0.002, SEM = 8.1 bpm and CV = 5.8%) and RPEmax (ICC: 0.525, P = 0.036, SEM = 0.4 and CV = 3.6%) presented similar reliability indicators, and no statistically significant differences were obtained between the two test sessions (P > 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots indicated good agreement between HRmax and RPEmax. CONCLUSION: HR and RPE showed similar reliability and agreement during the isometric wall squat incremental test.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0c7b2cda07c4d1dbd731e2a24ccb6f0
institution DOAJ
issn 1806-9460
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina
record_format Article
series São Paulo Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-e0c7b2cda07c4d1dbd731e2a24ccb6f02025-08-20T03:17:02ZengAssociação Paulista de MedicinaSão Paulo Medical Journal1806-94602025-03-01143210.1590/1516-3180.2024.0092.r1.29072024Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement studyPaulo Henrique de Melohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-4294Anderson Cavalcantehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7486-3453Jessika Karla Tavares do Nascimento Faustino Silvahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7805-0820José Lucas Porto Aguiarhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-2534Jefferson Maxwell De Farias Silvahttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-9114-0919Theo Victor Alves Soares Rêgohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-0950Raphael Mendes Ritti-Diashttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-6746Breno Quintella Farahhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2286-5892ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that isometric exercise training reduces systolic blood pressure by approximately 8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by approximately 4 mmHg in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals. However, the prescription of isometric exercises can be based on the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) or heart rate (HR) obtained during the maximal incremental isometry test. The reliability and agreement of this test have not been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the reliability and agreement indicators of HR and RPE during isometric wall squat incremental tests. DESIGN AND SETTING: A reliability and agreement study was conducted at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy subjects (54% men, 26 ± 5 years) performed two isometric wall squat incremental tests. The test began with a knee joint angle of 135° (knee and leg) progressively reduced by 10° at each stage. Each stage lasts 2 minutes or until voluntary exhaustion. The HR and RPE were obtained during the tests. Reliability and agreement were established using test-retest (paired t-test or Wilcoxon test), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The HR and RPE increased significantly during both tests. The HR and RPE at each stage were similar between the two test sessions (P > 0.05). Both HRmax (ICC: 0.695, P = 0.002, SEM = 8.1 bpm and CV = 5.8%) and RPEmax (ICC: 0.525, P = 0.036, SEM = 0.4 and CV = 3.6%) presented similar reliability indicators, and no statistically significant differences were obtained between the two test sessions (P > 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots indicated good agreement between HRmax and RPEmax. CONCLUSION: HR and RPE showed similar reliability and agreement during the isometric wall squat incremental test.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802025000200204&lng=en&tlng=enExerciseResistance trainingObserver variationReproducibility of resultsIsometric exerciseReproducibilitySquat exercises
spellingShingle Paulo Henrique de Melo
Anderson Cavalcante
Jessika Karla Tavares do Nascimento Faustino Silva
José Lucas Porto Aguiar
Jefferson Maxwell De Farias Silva
Theo Victor Alves Soares Rêgo
Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias
Breno Quintella Farah
Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study
São Paulo Medical Journal
Exercise
Resistance training
Observer variation
Reproducibility of results
Isometric exercise
Reproducibility
Squat exercises
title Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study
title_full Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study
title_fullStr Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study
title_full_unstemmed Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study
title_short Rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription: Reliability and agreement study
title_sort rating of perceived exertion versus heart rate for isometric exercise prescription reliability and agreement study
topic Exercise
Resistance training
Observer variation
Reproducibility of results
Isometric exercise
Reproducibility
Squat exercises
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802025000200204&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT paulohenriquedemelo ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy
AT andersoncavalcante ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy
AT jessikakarlatavaresdonascimentofaustinosilva ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy
AT joselucasportoaguiar ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy
AT jeffersonmaxwelldefariassilva ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy
AT theovictoralvessoaresrego ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy
AT raphaelmendesrittidias ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy
AT brenoquintellafarah ratingofperceivedexertionversusheartrateforisometricexerciseprescriptionreliabilityandagreementstudy