Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial

Introduction Routinely collected data can be linked to research data to create a rich dataset and inform practice. However, consent is normally required to link identifiable data. Reported rates of consent to data linkage for children ranged from 21% to 96%, but no studies have investigated differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane E Harding, Barry Milne, Jenny Rogers, Greg Gamble, Jane Marie Alsweiler, Christopher McKinlay, Gavin Brown, Aakash Bajirao Rajay, Caroline Anne Crowther, Nike Franke, Trecia Wouldes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e060476.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576306726830080
author Jane E Harding
Barry Milne
Jenny Rogers
Greg Gamble
Jane Marie Alsweiler
Christopher McKinlay
Gavin Brown
Aakash Bajirao Rajay
Caroline Anne Crowther
Nike Franke
Trecia Wouldes
author_facet Jane E Harding
Barry Milne
Jenny Rogers
Greg Gamble
Jane Marie Alsweiler
Christopher McKinlay
Gavin Brown
Aakash Bajirao Rajay
Caroline Anne Crowther
Nike Franke
Trecia Wouldes
author_sort Jane E Harding
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Routinely collected data can be linked to research data to create a rich dataset and inform practice. However, consent is normally required to link identifiable data. Reported rates of consent to data linkage for children ranged from 21% to 96%, but no studies have investigated different approaches to seeking consent for data linkage for school-age children.Methods and analysis The Approaches to Consent for Routine Data Linkage in Neonatal Follow-up (ACORN) trial is a 2×2 factorial randomised trial to assess whether, for children who participated in neonatal randomised trials (pre-hypoglycaemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose Gel (hPOD), hPOD and The Impact of Protein Intravenous Nutrition on Development in Extremely Low Birth Weight Babies (ProVIDe)) and are approached to participate in an in-person assessment at 6–7 years of age, parental consent to data linkage is higher if consent is sought (1) after the in-person assessment (delayed) or concurrently and (2) for health and education data combined or separately. The primary outcomes will be rates of consent to linkage of (1) either health or education data and (2) both health and education data. A pilot study indicates the potentially available cohort size of 2110 (80% follow-up of the neonatal trial cohorts) would be adequate to detect an absolute difference of 6%–5%–4% from a baseline consent rate of 70%–85%–90%, respectively (2-tailed alpha 0.05, 90% power). With at least 1136 participants, the ACORN trial would have 90% power to detect an absolute difference of 5% in the primary outcome for each factor, assuming a consent rate of 90% in the control groups and alpha 0.05. Data are categorical and will be presented as number and per cent. The effects of factors will be tested using generalised linear models and presented as ORs and 95% CIs.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval by the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (19/STH/202). Dissemination will be via peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings, educational sessions and public fora.Trial registration number ACTRN12621000571875 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).
format Article
id doaj-art-e08132a533a8448795bdb50796d199e4
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-e08132a533a8448795bdb50796d199e42025-01-31T08:15:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-07-0112710.1136/bmjopen-2021-060476Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trialJane E Harding0Barry Milne1Jenny Rogers2Greg Gamble3Jane Marie Alsweiler4Christopher McKinlay5Gavin Brown6Aakash Bajirao Rajay7Caroline Anne Crowther8Nike Franke9Trecia Wouldes10Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand2 Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandDepartment of Paediatrics Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandFaculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandIntroduction Routinely collected data can be linked to research data to create a rich dataset and inform practice. However, consent is normally required to link identifiable data. Reported rates of consent to data linkage for children ranged from 21% to 96%, but no studies have investigated different approaches to seeking consent for data linkage for school-age children.Methods and analysis The Approaches to Consent for Routine Data Linkage in Neonatal Follow-up (ACORN) trial is a 2×2 factorial randomised trial to assess whether, for children who participated in neonatal randomised trials (pre-hypoglycaemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose Gel (hPOD), hPOD and The Impact of Protein Intravenous Nutrition on Development in Extremely Low Birth Weight Babies (ProVIDe)) and are approached to participate in an in-person assessment at 6–7 years of age, parental consent to data linkage is higher if consent is sought (1) after the in-person assessment (delayed) or concurrently and (2) for health and education data combined or separately. The primary outcomes will be rates of consent to linkage of (1) either health or education data and (2) both health and education data. A pilot study indicates the potentially available cohort size of 2110 (80% follow-up of the neonatal trial cohorts) would be adequate to detect an absolute difference of 6%–5%–4% from a baseline consent rate of 70%–85%–90%, respectively (2-tailed alpha 0.05, 90% power). With at least 1136 participants, the ACORN trial would have 90% power to detect an absolute difference of 5% in the primary outcome for each factor, assuming a consent rate of 90% in the control groups and alpha 0.05. Data are categorical and will be presented as number and per cent. The effects of factors will be tested using generalised linear models and presented as ORs and 95% CIs.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval by the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (19/STH/202). Dissemination will be via peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings, educational sessions and public fora.Trial registration number ACTRN12621000571875 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e060476.full
spellingShingle Jane E Harding
Barry Milne
Jenny Rogers
Greg Gamble
Jane Marie Alsweiler
Christopher McKinlay
Gavin Brown
Aakash Bajirao Rajay
Caroline Anne Crowther
Nike Franke
Trecia Wouldes
Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial
BMJ Open
title Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial
title_full Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial
title_fullStr Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial
title_short Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial
title_sort different approaches to requesting consent for routine data linkage in neonatal follow up acorn protocol for a 2 2 factorial randomised trial
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e060476.full
work_keys_str_mv AT janeeharding differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT barrymilne differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT jennyrogers differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT greggamble differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT janemariealsweiler differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT christophermckinlay differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT gavinbrown differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT aakashbajiraorajay differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT carolineannecrowther differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT nikefranke differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial
AT treciawouldes differentapproachestorequestingconsentforroutinedatalinkageinneonatalfollowupacornprotocolfora22factorialrandomisedtrial