Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review
BackgroundSocial determinants of health (SDH) have been shown to be predictors of health outcomes. Integrating SDH screening tools into primary care may help identify individuals or groups with a greater burden of social vulnerability and promote health equity. Ob...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Research Protocols |
| Online Access: | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2025/1/e68668 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850084765291511808 |
|---|---|
| author | Julia Martínez-Alfonso Fernando Sebastian-Valles Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino Nuria Jimenez-Olivas Antonio Cabrera-Majada Iván De los Mozos-Hernando Shkelzen Cekrezi Héctor Martínez-Martínez Arthur Eumann Mesas |
| author_facet | Julia Martínez-Alfonso Fernando Sebastian-Valles Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino Nuria Jimenez-Olivas Antonio Cabrera-Majada Iván De los Mozos-Hernando Shkelzen Cekrezi Héctor Martínez-Martínez Arthur Eumann Mesas |
| author_sort | Julia Martínez-Alfonso |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundSocial determinants of health (SDH) have been shown to be predictors of health outcomes. Integrating SDH screening tools into primary care may help identify individuals or groups with a greater burden of social vulnerability and promote health equity.
ObjectiveThis study aimed (1) to identify the existing screening tools to assess social deprivation in adults in primary care settings; (2) to describe the characteristics of these tools and, where appropriate, their psychometric properties; (3) to describe their validity and reliability in those scales in which validation processes have been conducted; and (4) to identify evidence gaps and provide recommendations for future research.
MethodsThis study protocol was structured according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Furthermore, since not all SDH assessment tools are published as scientific papers, we will use a slightly modified form of the scoping review framework to retrieve specific information about specific tools for screening SDH in primary care contexts. The following electronic databases will be searched by 2 reviewers: MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and Scopus. In addition, the following sources will also be searched for gray literature: DART-Europe E-thesis Portal, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. After the revision of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the titles, abstracts, and full text of the included studies will be separately screened by 2 reviewers. A PRISMA-ScR flowchart will be used to depict the sources of evidence screened, and data charting will be used to gain in-depth knowledge. The findings of the scoping review will be presented in both narrative and tabular formats, summarizing the existing literature on tools used for SDH in primary care settings. A critical analysis will be undertaken to address the variability in tool validation, cultural adaptability, and integration into different health care systems. Finally, key gaps in the existing evidence will be explored, and research priorities will be proposed, emphasizing the need for screening tools that are culturally sensitive, scalable, and easily integrated into primary care workflows. This critically appraised information may be useful for implementing SDH screening tools in primary care settings and may contribute to future research addressing feasibility and validation studies in different primary health care systems.
ResultsThe study began in July 2024. Data collection is expected to be completed in April 2025, with publication expected in October 2025.
ConclusionsThis scoping review will provide a comprehensive and critical description of the available tools aimed at screening SDH in primary care settings. Incorporating these tools into routine care has been recognized as a key strategy for addressing health inequalities, given the growing evidence base on the influence of SDH on health outcomes.
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/68668 |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-df75a03a3b01470e95f8c4f626b927d3 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1929-0748 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Research Protocols |
| spelling | doaj-art-df75a03a3b01470e95f8c4f626b927d32025-08-20T02:43:55ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482025-02-0114e6866810.2196/68668Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping ReviewJulia Martínez-Alfonsohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8241-0537Fernando Sebastian-Valleshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-0483Vicente Martinez-Vizcainohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-7893Nuria Jimenez-Olivashttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-4822Antonio Cabrera-Majadahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-2815Iván De los Mozos-Hernandohttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-2507-4755Shkelzen Cekrezihttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-5016-3529Héctor Martínez-Martínezhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-3991-3593Arthur Eumann Mesashttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0088-8607 BackgroundSocial determinants of health (SDH) have been shown to be predictors of health outcomes. Integrating SDH screening tools into primary care may help identify individuals or groups with a greater burden of social vulnerability and promote health equity. ObjectiveThis study aimed (1) to identify the existing screening tools to assess social deprivation in adults in primary care settings; (2) to describe the characteristics of these tools and, where appropriate, their psychometric properties; (3) to describe their validity and reliability in those scales in which validation processes have been conducted; and (4) to identify evidence gaps and provide recommendations for future research. MethodsThis study protocol was structured according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Furthermore, since not all SDH assessment tools are published as scientific papers, we will use a slightly modified form of the scoping review framework to retrieve specific information about specific tools for screening SDH in primary care contexts. The following electronic databases will be searched by 2 reviewers: MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and Scopus. In addition, the following sources will also be searched for gray literature: DART-Europe E-thesis Portal, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. After the revision of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the titles, abstracts, and full text of the included studies will be separately screened by 2 reviewers. A PRISMA-ScR flowchart will be used to depict the sources of evidence screened, and data charting will be used to gain in-depth knowledge. The findings of the scoping review will be presented in both narrative and tabular formats, summarizing the existing literature on tools used for SDH in primary care settings. A critical analysis will be undertaken to address the variability in tool validation, cultural adaptability, and integration into different health care systems. Finally, key gaps in the existing evidence will be explored, and research priorities will be proposed, emphasizing the need for screening tools that are culturally sensitive, scalable, and easily integrated into primary care workflows. This critically appraised information may be useful for implementing SDH screening tools in primary care settings and may contribute to future research addressing feasibility and validation studies in different primary health care systems. ResultsThe study began in July 2024. Data collection is expected to be completed in April 2025, with publication expected in October 2025. ConclusionsThis scoping review will provide a comprehensive and critical description of the available tools aimed at screening SDH in primary care settings. Incorporating these tools into routine care has been recognized as a key strategy for addressing health inequalities, given the growing evidence base on the influence of SDH on health outcomes. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/68668https://www.researchprotocols.org/2025/1/e68668 |
| spellingShingle | Julia Martínez-Alfonso Fernando Sebastian-Valles Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino Nuria Jimenez-Olivas Antonio Cabrera-Majada Iván De los Mozos-Hernando Shkelzen Cekrezi Héctor Martínez-Martínez Arthur Eumann Mesas Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review JMIR Research Protocols |
| title | Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_full | Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_fullStr | Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_short | Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review |
| title_sort | social determinants of health screening tools for adults in primary care protocol for a scoping review |
| url | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2025/1/e68668 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT juliamartinezalfonso socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT fernandosebastianvalles socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT vicentemartinezvizcaino socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT nuriajimenezolivas socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT antoniocabreramajada socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT ivandelosmozoshernando socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT shkelzencekrezi socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT hectormartinezmartinez socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview AT arthureumannmesas socialdeterminantsofhealthscreeningtoolsforadultsinprimarycareprotocolforascopingreview |