Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

ABSTRACT Background Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are the second‐leading cause of death in cancer patients, with an incidence of 5%–17% in lymphoma patients, particularly higher in those with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Existing risk assessment models (RAMs) like the Khorana and ThroLy scores...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Li, Rui Liu, Ying Shen, GongZhizi Gao, Rui Yang, Yiwen Wang, Ruoyu Yang, Zujie Lin, Ruijun Dong, Wanhong Zhao, Aili He, Ju Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70510
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593706136371200
author Wen Li
Rui Liu
Ying Shen
GongZhizi Gao
Rui Yang
Yiwen Wang
Ruoyu Yang
Zujie Lin
Ruijun Dong
Wanhong Zhao
Aili He
Ju Bai
author_facet Wen Li
Rui Liu
Ying Shen
GongZhizi Gao
Rui Yang
Yiwen Wang
Ruoyu Yang
Zujie Lin
Ruijun Dong
Wanhong Zhao
Aili He
Ju Bai
author_sort Wen Li
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are the second‐leading cause of death in cancer patients, with an incidence of 5%–17% in lymphoma patients, particularly higher in those with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Existing risk assessment models (RAMs) like the Khorana and ThroLy scores have limitations and are inadequately validated for NHL patients. Coagulation markers such as D‐dimer, thrombin–antithrombin complex (TAT), and thrombomodulin (TM) show a potential predictive value for cancer‐associated VTE but lack extensive research in NHL. Objectives This study aimed to analyze characteristics and predictive risk factors for VTE in newly diagnosed NHL patients and to evaluate and improve the clinical applicability of the Khorana and ThroLy scores. Methods Data were collected from newly diagnosed NHL patients to analyze characteristics and potential predictive risk factors for VTE. The clinical applicability of the Khorana and ThroLy scores was evaluated, and the ThroLy score was improved by adjusting the hemoglobin cutoff and combining it with D‐dimer testing. Sequential testing with TM and TAT levels was also performed. Results VTE developed in 7.09% of NHL patients. Independent risk factors for VTE included clinical Stage III/IV, mediastinal involvement, history of VTE, D‐dimer≥ 1345 μg/dL, and platelet (PLT)≥ 298 × 109, and Hb≥ 110 g/L was an independent protective factor for VTE. The ThroLy score was improved by adjusting the hemoglobin cutoff and combining it with D‐dimer testing. Sequential testing of TM and TAT achieved a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.7%. Conclusions VTE is a significant complication in NHL patients. The study highlighted independent risk factors and proposed a modified risk assessment model that effectively predicted VTE risk, potentially optimizing prevention and reducing healthcare costs.
format Article
id doaj-art-df3d7d8fd5fd49bba23921c0f5aa001b
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-df3d7d8fd5fd49bba23921c0f5aa001b2025-01-20T10:51:32ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342024-12-011324n/an/a10.1002/cam4.70510Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma PatientsWen Li0Rui Liu1Ying Shen2GongZhizi Gao3Rui Yang4Yiwen Wang5Ruoyu Yang6Zujie Lin7Ruijun Dong8Wanhong Zhao9Aili He10Ju Bai11Department of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaDepartment of Hematology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi ChinaABSTRACT Background Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are the second‐leading cause of death in cancer patients, with an incidence of 5%–17% in lymphoma patients, particularly higher in those with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Existing risk assessment models (RAMs) like the Khorana and ThroLy scores have limitations and are inadequately validated for NHL patients. Coagulation markers such as D‐dimer, thrombin–antithrombin complex (TAT), and thrombomodulin (TM) show a potential predictive value for cancer‐associated VTE but lack extensive research in NHL. Objectives This study aimed to analyze characteristics and predictive risk factors for VTE in newly diagnosed NHL patients and to evaluate and improve the clinical applicability of the Khorana and ThroLy scores. Methods Data were collected from newly diagnosed NHL patients to analyze characteristics and potential predictive risk factors for VTE. The clinical applicability of the Khorana and ThroLy scores was evaluated, and the ThroLy score was improved by adjusting the hemoglobin cutoff and combining it with D‐dimer testing. Sequential testing with TM and TAT levels was also performed. Results VTE developed in 7.09% of NHL patients. Independent risk factors for VTE included clinical Stage III/IV, mediastinal involvement, history of VTE, D‐dimer≥ 1345 μg/dL, and platelet (PLT)≥ 298 × 109, and Hb≥ 110 g/L was an independent protective factor for VTE. The ThroLy score was improved by adjusting the hemoglobin cutoff and combining it with D‐dimer testing. Sequential testing of TM and TAT achieved a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.7%. Conclusions VTE is a significant complication in NHL patients. The study highlighted independent risk factors and proposed a modified risk assessment model that effectively predicted VTE risk, potentially optimizing prevention and reducing healthcare costs.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70510non‐Hodgkin lymphomarisk assessment modelThroLy scorethrombin–antithrombin complexthrombomodulinvenous thromboembolic event
spellingShingle Wen Li
Rui Liu
Ying Shen
GongZhizi Gao
Rui Yang
Yiwen Wang
Ruoyu Yang
Zujie Lin
Ruijun Dong
Wanhong Zhao
Aili He
Ju Bai
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
Cancer Medicine
non‐Hodgkin lymphoma
risk assessment model
ThroLy score
thrombin–antithrombin complex
thrombomodulin
venous thromboembolic event
title Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
title_full Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
title_fullStr Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
title_short Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
title_sort incidence risk factors and modified risk assessment model of venous thromboembolism in non hodgkin lymphoma patients
topic non‐Hodgkin lymphoma
risk assessment model
ThroLy score
thrombin–antithrombin complex
thrombomodulin
venous thromboembolic event
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70510
work_keys_str_mv AT wenli incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT ruiliu incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT yingshen incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT gongzhizigao incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT ruiyang incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT yiwenwang incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT ruoyuyang incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT zujielin incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT ruijundong incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT wanhongzhao incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT ailihe incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients
AT jubai incidenceriskfactorsandmodifiedriskassessmentmodelofvenousthromboembolisminnonhodgkinlymphomapatients