How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?
The current era of globalization and commodification has had a substantial impact on common-pool resources governance. In direct response to this, community-based organizations managing water and forests at the local level began to create their own transnational networks. Primarily, these organizati...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Développement Durable et Territoires |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/11636 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832095591987937280 |
---|---|
author | Émilie Dupuits Géraldine Pflieger |
author_facet | Émilie Dupuits Géraldine Pflieger |
author_sort | Émilie Dupuits |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The current era of globalization and commodification has had a substantial impact on common-pool resources governance. In direct response to this, community-based organizations managing water and forests at the local level began to create their own transnational networks. Primarily, these organizations aim to achieve direct representation in international decision-making arenas in order to promote their model of collective governance. By reframing the representations of common-pool resources (from commodities to human rights or collective goods), they seek to influence norm-building processes and establish specific scales of community-based governance (local, regional or global).To what extent does the reframing of common-pool resources impact the scales of water and forests governance? This paper addresses the question by adopting a geographical approach of transnational social movements and undertaking a discourse analysis. The study focuses on two case studies: the Latin-American Confederation of Community Organizations for Water Services and Sanitation (CLOCSAS), and the Mesoamerican Alliance of Peoples and Forests (AMPB). On one hand, CLOCSAS frames water as a global common good and a universal human right compatible with an economic value. It aims to become an alternative expert on water issues. On the other hand, AMPB frames forests as a local common good and a territorial right. It aims to be differentiated from technical experts and works to consolidate territorial authority. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-ddac06251aaa47b99bf5797206f4d6c8 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1772-9971 |
language | fra |
publishDate | 2017-04-01 |
publisher | Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles |
record_format | Article |
series | Développement Durable et Territoires |
spelling | doaj-art-ddac06251aaa47b99bf5797206f4d6c82025-02-05T16:35:19ZfraRéseau Développement Durable et Territoires FragilesDéveloppement Durable et Territoires1772-99712017-04-01810.4000/developpementdurable.11636How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?Émilie DupuitsGéraldine PfliegerThe current era of globalization and commodification has had a substantial impact on common-pool resources governance. In direct response to this, community-based organizations managing water and forests at the local level began to create their own transnational networks. Primarily, these organizations aim to achieve direct representation in international decision-making arenas in order to promote their model of collective governance. By reframing the representations of common-pool resources (from commodities to human rights or collective goods), they seek to influence norm-building processes and establish specific scales of community-based governance (local, regional or global).To what extent does the reframing of common-pool resources impact the scales of water and forests governance? This paper addresses the question by adopting a geographical approach of transnational social movements and undertaking a discourse analysis. The study focuses on two case studies: the Latin-American Confederation of Community Organizations for Water Services and Sanitation (CLOCSAS), and the Mesoamerican Alliance of Peoples and Forests (AMPB). On one hand, CLOCSAS frames water as a global common good and a universal human right compatible with an economic value. It aims to become an alternative expert on water issues. On the other hand, AMPB frames forests as a local common good and a territorial right. It aims to be differentiated from technical experts and works to consolidate territorial authority.https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/11636watercommon-pool resources governanceforeststransnational grassroots networkscommunity-based organizationsLatin-America |
spellingShingle | Émilie Dupuits Géraldine Pflieger How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance? Développement Durable et Territoires water common-pool resources governance forests transnational grassroots networks community-based organizations Latin-America |
title | How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance? |
title_full | How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance? |
title_fullStr | How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance? |
title_full_unstemmed | How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance? |
title_short | How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance? |
title_sort | how do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance |
topic | water common-pool resources governance forests transnational grassroots networks community-based organizations Latin-America |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/11636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emiliedupuits howdotransnationalgrassrootsnetworksreframetheglobalnormsofwaterandforestsgovernance AT geraldinepflieger howdotransnationalgrassrootsnetworksreframetheglobalnormsofwaterandforestsgovernance |