How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?

The current era of globalization and commodification has had a substantial impact on common-pool resources governance. In direct response to this, community-based organizations managing water and forests at the local level began to create their own transnational networks. Primarily, these organizati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Émilie Dupuits, Géraldine Pflieger
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles 2017-04-01
Series:Développement Durable et Territoires
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/11636
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832095591987937280
author Émilie Dupuits
Géraldine Pflieger
author_facet Émilie Dupuits
Géraldine Pflieger
author_sort Émilie Dupuits
collection DOAJ
description The current era of globalization and commodification has had a substantial impact on common-pool resources governance. In direct response to this, community-based organizations managing water and forests at the local level began to create their own transnational networks. Primarily, these organizations aim to achieve direct representation in international decision-making arenas in order to promote their model of collective governance. By reframing the representations of common-pool resources (from commodities to human rights or collective goods), they seek to influence norm-building processes and establish specific scales of community-based governance (local, regional or global).To what extent does the reframing of common-pool resources impact the scales of water and forests governance? This paper addresses the question by adopting a geographical approach of transnational social movements and undertaking a discourse analysis. The study focuses on two case studies: the Latin-American Confederation of Community Organizations for Water Services and Sanitation (CLOCSAS), and the Mesoamerican Alliance of Peoples and Forests (AMPB). On one hand, CLOCSAS frames water as a global common good and a universal human right compatible with an economic value. It aims to become an alternative expert on water issues. On the other hand, AMPB frames forests as a local common good and a territorial right. It aims to be differentiated from technical experts and works to consolidate territorial authority.
format Article
id doaj-art-ddac06251aaa47b99bf5797206f4d6c8
institution Kabale University
issn 1772-9971
language fra
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
record_format Article
series Développement Durable et Territoires
spelling doaj-art-ddac06251aaa47b99bf5797206f4d6c82025-02-05T16:35:19ZfraRéseau Développement Durable et Territoires FragilesDéveloppement Durable et Territoires1772-99712017-04-01810.4000/developpementdurable.11636How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?Émilie DupuitsGéraldine PfliegerThe current era of globalization and commodification has had a substantial impact on common-pool resources governance. In direct response to this, community-based organizations managing water and forests at the local level began to create their own transnational networks. Primarily, these organizations aim to achieve direct representation in international decision-making arenas in order to promote their model of collective governance. By reframing the representations of common-pool resources (from commodities to human rights or collective goods), they seek to influence norm-building processes and establish specific scales of community-based governance (local, regional or global).To what extent does the reframing of common-pool resources impact the scales of water and forests governance? This paper addresses the question by adopting a geographical approach of transnational social movements and undertaking a discourse analysis. The study focuses on two case studies: the Latin-American Confederation of Community Organizations for Water Services and Sanitation (CLOCSAS), and the Mesoamerican Alliance of Peoples and Forests (AMPB). On one hand, CLOCSAS frames water as a global common good and a universal human right compatible with an economic value. It aims to become an alternative expert on water issues. On the other hand, AMPB frames forests as a local common good and a territorial right. It aims to be differentiated from technical experts and works to consolidate territorial authority.https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/11636watercommon-pool resources governanceforeststransnational grassroots networkscommunity-based organizationsLatin-America
spellingShingle Émilie Dupuits
Géraldine Pflieger
How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?
Développement Durable et Territoires
water
common-pool resources governance
forests
transnational grassroots networks
community-based organizations
Latin-America
title How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?
title_full How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?
title_fullStr How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?
title_full_unstemmed How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?
title_short How do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance?
title_sort how do transnational grassroots networks reframe the global norms of water and forests governance
topic water
common-pool resources governance
forests
transnational grassroots networks
community-based organizations
Latin-America
url https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/11636
work_keys_str_mv AT emiliedupuits howdotransnationalgrassrootsnetworksreframetheglobalnormsofwaterandforestsgovernance
AT geraldinepflieger howdotransnationalgrassrootsnetworksreframetheglobalnormsofwaterandforestsgovernance