L’art et la science à l’épreuve du paysage
The question of the relationship between art and science arises in a particular way when we look at landscape. Because landscape is a hybrid object, made up of nature and culture, it requires rethinking the distinction commonly accepted between art and science. The purpose of this article is to expl...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille
2010-02-01
|
| Series: | Projets de Paysage |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/26373 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The question of the relationship between art and science arises in a particular way when we look at landscape. Because landscape is a hybrid object, made up of nature and culture, it requires rethinking the distinction commonly accepted between art and science. The purpose of this article is to explain how this dichotomy has been justified in the field of landscape and, more specifically, through questioning the landscape expertise. It outlines the two paradigms that have nourished the disciplines involved in the study of landscape. It aims to show that a third paradigm, testified by new theoretical propositions and a reconfiguration of knowledge, emerges with the hypothesis of a unit of sciences of landscape. Thus, far to appeal to a simple articulation of art and science or to overcome the opposition – which would lead to testing it – the landscape challenges us to rethink the organization of the sciences relative to landscape, and beyond, the configuration of the fields of knowledge inherited from the nineteenth century. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1969-6124 |