Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants

Placement of implants in fresh sockets is an alternative to try to reduce physiological resorption of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. This surgery can be used to preserve the bone architecture and also accelerate the restorative procedure. However, the diastasis observed between bone and impl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pâmela Letícia Santos, Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli, Cristino da Silva Telles, Walter Betoni Júnior, Roberta Okamoto, Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani, Thallita Pereira Queiroz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Biomaterials
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/307136
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566576346300416
author Pâmela Letícia Santos
Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli
Cristino da Silva Telles
Walter Betoni Júnior
Roberta Okamoto
Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani
Thallita Pereira Queiroz
author_facet Pâmela Letícia Santos
Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli
Cristino da Silva Telles
Walter Betoni Júnior
Roberta Okamoto
Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani
Thallita Pereira Queiroz
author_sort Pâmela Letícia Santos
collection DOAJ
description Placement of implants in fresh sockets is an alternative to try to reduce physiological resorption of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. This surgery can be used to preserve the bone architecture and also accelerate the restorative procedure. However, the diastasis observed between bone and implant may influence osseointegration. So, autogenous bone graft and/or biomaterials have been used to fill this gap. Considering the importance of bone repair for treatment with implants placed immediately after tooth extraction, this study aimed to present a literature review about biomaterials surrounding immediate dental implants. The search included 56 articles published from 1969 to 2012. The results were based on data analysis and discussion. It was observed that implant fixation immediately after extraction is a reliable alternative to reduce the treatment length of prosthetic restoration. In general, the biomaterial should be used to increase bone/implant contact and enhance osseointegration.
format Article
id doaj-art-dd122b83554c4e20bf088ba1949d3f95
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8787
1687-8795
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Biomaterials
spelling doaj-art-dd122b83554c4e20bf088ba1949d3f952025-02-03T01:03:49ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomaterials1687-87871687-87952013-01-01201310.1155/2013/307136307136Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction ImplantsPâmela Letícia Santos0Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli1Cristino da Silva Telles2Walter Betoni Júnior3Roberta Okamoto4Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani5Thallita Pereira Queiroz6Department of Oral Biology Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, BrazilDepartment of Oral Biology Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, BrazilSchool of Implantology of Cuiaba, BrazilSchool of Implantology of Cuiaba, BrazilDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Oral Biology Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, BrazilDepartment of Health Sciences, Implantology Post Graduation Course, Dental School, University Center of Araraquara, UNIARA, SP, BrazilPlacement of implants in fresh sockets is an alternative to try to reduce physiological resorption of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. This surgery can be used to preserve the bone architecture and also accelerate the restorative procedure. However, the diastasis observed between bone and implant may influence osseointegration. So, autogenous bone graft and/or biomaterials have been used to fill this gap. Considering the importance of bone repair for treatment with implants placed immediately after tooth extraction, this study aimed to present a literature review about biomaterials surrounding immediate dental implants. The search included 56 articles published from 1969 to 2012. The results were based on data analysis and discussion. It was observed that implant fixation immediately after extraction is a reliable alternative to reduce the treatment length of prosthetic restoration. In general, the biomaterial should be used to increase bone/implant contact and enhance osseointegration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/307136
spellingShingle Pâmela Letícia Santos
Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli
Cristino da Silva Telles
Walter Betoni Júnior
Roberta Okamoto
Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani
Thallita Pereira Queiroz
Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants
International Journal of Biomaterials
title Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants
title_full Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants
title_fullStr Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants
title_full_unstemmed Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants
title_short Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants
title_sort bone substitutes for peri implant defects of postextraction implants
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/307136
work_keys_str_mv AT pamelaleticiasantos bonesubstitutesforperiimplantdefectsofpostextractionimplants
AT jessicalemosgulinelli bonesubstitutesforperiimplantdefectsofpostextractionimplants
AT cristinodasilvatelles bonesubstitutesforperiimplantdefectsofpostextractionimplants
AT walterbetonijunior bonesubstitutesforperiimplantdefectsofpostextractionimplants
AT robertaokamoto bonesubstitutesforperiimplantdefectsofpostextractionimplants
AT vivianchiacchiobuchignani bonesubstitutesforperiimplantdefectsofpostextractionimplants
AT thallitapereiraqueiroz bonesubstitutesforperiimplantdefectsofpostextractionimplants