Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke
The efficacy of standard rehabilitative therapy for improving upper limb functions after stroke is limited; thus, alternative strategies are needed. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation is a promising approach, but the invasiveness of this technique limits its clinical applicatio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Neural Plasticity |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7876507 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832549618237308928 |
---|---|
author | Fioravante Capone Sandra Miccinilli Giovanni Pellegrino Loredana Zollo Davide Simonetti Federica Bressi Lucia Florio Federico Ranieri Emma Falato Alessandro Di Santo Alessio Pepe Eugenio Guglielmelli Silvia Sterzi Vincenzo Di Lazzaro |
author_facet | Fioravante Capone Sandra Miccinilli Giovanni Pellegrino Loredana Zollo Davide Simonetti Federica Bressi Lucia Florio Federico Ranieri Emma Falato Alessandro Di Santo Alessio Pepe Eugenio Guglielmelli Silvia Sterzi Vincenzo Di Lazzaro |
author_sort | Fioravante Capone |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The efficacy of standard rehabilitative therapy for improving upper limb functions after stroke is limited; thus, alternative strategies are needed. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation is a promising approach, but the invasiveness of this technique limits its clinical application. Recently, a noninvasive method to stimulate vagus nerve has been developed. The aim of the present study was to explore whether noninvasive VNS combined with robotic rehabilitation can enhance upper limb functionality in chronic stroke. Safety and efficacy of this combination have been assessed within a proof-of-principle, double-blind, semirandomized, sham-controlled trial. Fourteen patients with either ischemic or haemorrhagic chronic stroke were randomized to robot-assisted therapy associated with real or sham VNS, delivered for 10 working days. Efficacy was evaluated by change in upper extremity Fugl–Meyer score. After intervention, there were no adverse events and Fugl–Meyer scores were significantly better in the real group compared to the sham group. Our pilot study confirms that VNS is feasible in stroke patients and can produce a slight clinical improvement in association to robotic rehabilitation. Compared to traditional stimulation, noninvasive VNS seems to be safer and more tolerable. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this innovative approach. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-dc864f5da01b47c18306037e8a5f078a |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-5904 1687-5443 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Neural Plasticity |
spelling | doaj-art-dc864f5da01b47c18306037e8a5f078a2025-02-03T06:10:54ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432017-01-01201710.1155/2017/78765077876507Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after StrokeFioravante Capone0Sandra Miccinilli1Giovanni Pellegrino2Loredana Zollo3Davide Simonetti4Federica Bressi5Lucia Florio6Federico Ranieri7Emma Falato8Alessandro Di Santo9Alessio Pepe10Eugenio Guglielmelli11Silvia Sterzi12Vincenzo Di Lazzaro13Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalySan Camillo Hospital IRCCS, Venice, ItalyUnit of Biomedical Robotics and Biomicrosystems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Biomedical Robotics and Biomicrosystems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Biomedical Robotics and Biomicrosystems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, ItalyThe efficacy of standard rehabilitative therapy for improving upper limb functions after stroke is limited; thus, alternative strategies are needed. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation is a promising approach, but the invasiveness of this technique limits its clinical application. Recently, a noninvasive method to stimulate vagus nerve has been developed. The aim of the present study was to explore whether noninvasive VNS combined with robotic rehabilitation can enhance upper limb functionality in chronic stroke. Safety and efficacy of this combination have been assessed within a proof-of-principle, double-blind, semirandomized, sham-controlled trial. Fourteen patients with either ischemic or haemorrhagic chronic stroke were randomized to robot-assisted therapy associated with real or sham VNS, delivered for 10 working days. Efficacy was evaluated by change in upper extremity Fugl–Meyer score. After intervention, there were no adverse events and Fugl–Meyer scores were significantly better in the real group compared to the sham group. Our pilot study confirms that VNS is feasible in stroke patients and can produce a slight clinical improvement in association to robotic rehabilitation. Compared to traditional stimulation, noninvasive VNS seems to be safer and more tolerable. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this innovative approach.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7876507 |
spellingShingle | Fioravante Capone Sandra Miccinilli Giovanni Pellegrino Loredana Zollo Davide Simonetti Federica Bressi Lucia Florio Federico Ranieri Emma Falato Alessandro Di Santo Alessio Pepe Eugenio Guglielmelli Silvia Sterzi Vincenzo Di Lazzaro Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke Neural Plasticity |
title | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke |
title_full | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke |
title_fullStr | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke |
title_short | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke |
title_sort | transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation combined with robotic rehabilitation improves upper limb function after stroke |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7876507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fioravantecapone transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT sandramiccinilli transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT giovannipellegrino transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT loredanazollo transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT davidesimonetti transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT federicabressi transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT luciaflorio transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT federicoranieri transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT emmafalato transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT alessandrodisanto transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT alessiopepe transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT eugenioguglielmelli transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT silviasterzi transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke AT vincenzodilazzaro transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationcombinedwithroboticrehabilitationimprovesupperlimbfunctionafterstroke |