The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)

As part of a world revision of the family Chrysididae it has been necessary to borrow or study in situ as many of the oldest types as possible because of potential confusion about their identity. The species described by Fabricius represent a particular problem. He named many of the commonest Europe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lynn Siri Kimsey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1987-01-01
Series:Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1987/43787
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555884442550272
author Lynn Siri Kimsey
author_facet Lynn Siri Kimsey
author_sort Lynn Siri Kimsey
collection DOAJ
description As part of a world revision of the family Chrysididae it has been necessary to borrow or study in situ as many of the oldest types as possible because of potential confusion about their identity. The species described by Fabricius represent a particular problem. He named many of the commonest European species, as well as other less common ones. Although the majority of Fabrician type specimens are still extant, it is clear that the chrysidid types were never seen by most later workers. In several instances the Fabrician species was assumed to be one thing when in fact it belonged to an entirely different genus. One example of this was Chrysis festiva Fabricius, which has always been considered a Pentachrysis, or Chrysis with 5 apical abdominal teeth (Mocsáry 1889, Dalla Torre 1892, Bischoff 1913). However, festiva is actually a species of Parhopes, as discussed by Kimsey (1987). The three species below present similar problems.
format Article
id doaj-art-db8451f143494f94a4d526140c366b04
institution Kabale University
issn 0033-2615
1687-7438
language English
publishDate 1987-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
spelling doaj-art-db8451f143494f94a4d526140c366b042025-02-03T05:46:59ZengWileyPsyche: A Journal of Entomology0033-26151687-74381987-01-01943-427127410.1155/1987/43787The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)Lynn Siri Kimsey0Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis 95616, USAAs part of a world revision of the family Chrysididae it has been necessary to borrow or study in situ as many of the oldest types as possible because of potential confusion about their identity. The species described by Fabricius represent a particular problem. He named many of the commonest European species, as well as other less common ones. Although the majority of Fabrician type specimens are still extant, it is clear that the chrysidid types were never seen by most later workers. In several instances the Fabrician species was assumed to be one thing when in fact it belonged to an entirely different genus. One example of this was Chrysis festiva Fabricius, which has always been considered a Pentachrysis, or Chrysis with 5 apical abdominal teeth (Mocsáry 1889, Dalla Torre 1892, Bischoff 1913). However, festiva is actually a species of Parhopes, as discussed by Kimsey (1987). The three species below present similar problems.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1987/43787
spellingShingle Lynn Siri Kimsey
The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)
Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
title The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)
title_full The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)
title_fullStr The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)
title_full_unstemmed The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)
title_short The Identity of three Fabrician Chrysidid Species (Hymenoptera)
title_sort identity of three fabrician chrysidid species hymenoptera
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1987/43787
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnsirikimsey theidentityofthreefabricianchrysididspecieshymenoptera
AT lynnsirikimsey identityofthreefabricianchrysididspecieshymenoptera