Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study

Abstract Background Giant cell arteritis is an inflammatory disease of the large- and medium-sized vessels. It is the most common primary vasculitis, with lifetime incidences of 0.5% and 1% in men and women, respectively. Its diagnosis is based upon clinical criteria, which may include temporal arte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Etienne Villeneuve, Jean-Michel Lacroix, Simon Brisebois
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00605-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569154249424896
author Etienne Villeneuve
Jean-Michel Lacroix
Simon Brisebois
author_facet Etienne Villeneuve
Jean-Michel Lacroix
Simon Brisebois
author_sort Etienne Villeneuve
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Giant cell arteritis is an inflammatory disease of the large- and medium-sized vessels. It is the most common primary vasculitis, with lifetime incidences of 0.5% and 1% in men and women, respectively. Its diagnosis is based upon clinical criteria, which may include temporal artery biopsy. Expected positivity rates of temporal artery biopsies and patient selection remain controversial topics in the literature. Methods A cross-sectional retrospective study of 127 patients referred for temporal artery biopsy with a diagnosis of suspected giant cell arteritis between January 2014 and December 2018 was performed. The primary outcome was the positivity rate. The relationships between positivity rates, symptoms, clinical suspicion, biopsy delay, biopsy length and corticosteroid treatment were also studied. Results A positivity rate of 23.7% (16.6–32.6%) was shown, along with a significant association between jaw claudication and specimen positivity (odds ratio 8.1, p < 0.05). Moreover, there were significant associations between a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and specimen positivity (p < 0.05), as well as a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and pursuit of corticosteroid treatment following biopsy results, regardless of positivity (p < 0.05). The duration of corticosteroid treatment prior to biopsy was not associated with a change in positivity rate. Conclusions The positivity rate of temporal artery biopsy was 23.7%. Treatment of patients with negative temporal artery biopsy was associated with maintenance of corticosteroid treatment when the initial clinical suspicion of arteritis was high. Therefore, temporal artery biopsy may not be necessary for patients with a high initial clinical suspicion of giant cell arteritis. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-da43580a996044c2a96aa1954a844bbe
institution Kabale University
issn 1916-0216
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj-art-da43580a996044c2a96aa1954a844bbe2025-02-02T23:08:46ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162023-01-015211810.1186/s40463-022-00605-6Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective studyEtienne Villeneuve0Jean-Michel Lacroix1Simon Brisebois2Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Université de SherbrookeUniversité de SherbrookeDivision of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Université de SherbrookeAbstract Background Giant cell arteritis is an inflammatory disease of the large- and medium-sized vessels. It is the most common primary vasculitis, with lifetime incidences of 0.5% and 1% in men and women, respectively. Its diagnosis is based upon clinical criteria, which may include temporal artery biopsy. Expected positivity rates of temporal artery biopsies and patient selection remain controversial topics in the literature. Methods A cross-sectional retrospective study of 127 patients referred for temporal artery biopsy with a diagnosis of suspected giant cell arteritis between January 2014 and December 2018 was performed. The primary outcome was the positivity rate. The relationships between positivity rates, symptoms, clinical suspicion, biopsy delay, biopsy length and corticosteroid treatment were also studied. Results A positivity rate of 23.7% (16.6–32.6%) was shown, along with a significant association between jaw claudication and specimen positivity (odds ratio 8.1, p < 0.05). Moreover, there were significant associations between a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and specimen positivity (p < 0.05), as well as a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and pursuit of corticosteroid treatment following biopsy results, regardless of positivity (p < 0.05). The duration of corticosteroid treatment prior to biopsy was not associated with a change in positivity rate. Conclusions The positivity rate of temporal artery biopsy was 23.7%. Treatment of patients with negative temporal artery biopsy was associated with maintenance of corticosteroid treatment when the initial clinical suspicion of arteritis was high. Therefore, temporal artery biopsy may not be necessary for patients with a high initial clinical suspicion of giant cell arteritis. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00605-6Temporal artery biopsyGiant cell arteritisTemporal arteritisPositivity rateJaw claudication
spellingShingle Etienne Villeneuve
Jean-Michel Lacroix
Simon Brisebois
Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Temporal artery biopsy
Giant cell arteritis
Temporal arteritis
Positivity rate
Jaw claudication
title Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study
title_full Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study
title_short Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study
title_sort optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy a retrospective study
topic Temporal artery biopsy
Giant cell arteritis
Temporal arteritis
Positivity rate
Jaw claudication
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00605-6
work_keys_str_mv AT etiennevilleneuve optimizingtheuseoftemporalarterybiopsyaretrospectivestudy
AT jeanmichellacroix optimizingtheuseoftemporalarterybiopsyaretrospectivestudy
AT simonbrisebois optimizingtheuseoftemporalarterybiopsyaretrospectivestudy