Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand Concrete
Seawater sea sand concrete (SWSSC) is a promising alternative to ordinary concrete in terms of saving valuable natural resources of freshwater and river sand. Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) rebars can be a good solution to corrosion of steel rebars in SWSSC. This paper presents an experiment...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8850809 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832554120191410176 |
|---|---|
| author | Chao Wu Bing-Chen Meng Xianfeng Cheng Asghar Habibnejad Korayem Lik-Ho Tam |
| author_facet | Chao Wu Bing-Chen Meng Xianfeng Cheng Asghar Habibnejad Korayem Lik-Ho Tam |
| author_sort | Chao Wu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Seawater sea sand concrete (SWSSC) is a promising alternative to ordinary concrete in terms of saving valuable natural resources of freshwater and river sand. Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) rebars can be a good solution to corrosion of steel rebars in SWSSC. This paper presents an experimental study on the bond behavior between SWSSC and BFRP rebars through pullout testing. Concrete mixed with freshwater and river sand was also prepared for comparison with SWSSC. BFRP rebars with two different surface configurations were selected, that is, ribbed surface and sand-coated surface. Fly ash as a replacement of cement was also investigated in terms of its effect on bond behavior. Failure modes, bond-slip relationships, and bond strengths were reported and discussed in terms of the previously mentioned parameters. It was found that ribbed surface of BFRP rebar could achieve better mechanical interlocking with surrounding concrete. SWSSC could have comparative bond strength with BFRP rebar compared with ordinary concrete. However, using fly ash to replace cement is not recommended because it would significantly reduce concrete strength leading to much lower bond at the interface between SWSSC and BFRP rebar. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d9a68b89fa704b0e97b9b7402d891e2b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8086 1687-8094 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-d9a68b89fa704b0e97b9b7402d891e2b2025-02-03T05:52:28ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942020-01-01202010.1155/2020/88508098850809Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand ConcreteChao Wu0Bing-Chen Meng1Xianfeng Cheng2Asghar Habibnejad Korayem3Lik-Ho Tam4School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100191, ChinaHua Da Highway Engineering Consultant and Supervision Co., Ltd., Tuanjie East Road No. 21, Gaobeidian, Hebei 074000, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, IranSchool of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100191, ChinaSeawater sea sand concrete (SWSSC) is a promising alternative to ordinary concrete in terms of saving valuable natural resources of freshwater and river sand. Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) rebars can be a good solution to corrosion of steel rebars in SWSSC. This paper presents an experimental study on the bond behavior between SWSSC and BFRP rebars through pullout testing. Concrete mixed with freshwater and river sand was also prepared for comparison with SWSSC. BFRP rebars with two different surface configurations were selected, that is, ribbed surface and sand-coated surface. Fly ash as a replacement of cement was also investigated in terms of its effect on bond behavior. Failure modes, bond-slip relationships, and bond strengths were reported and discussed in terms of the previously mentioned parameters. It was found that ribbed surface of BFRP rebar could achieve better mechanical interlocking with surrounding concrete. SWSSC could have comparative bond strength with BFRP rebar compared with ordinary concrete. However, using fly ash to replace cement is not recommended because it would significantly reduce concrete strength leading to much lower bond at the interface between SWSSC and BFRP rebar.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8850809 |
| spellingShingle | Chao Wu Bing-Chen Meng Xianfeng Cheng Asghar Habibnejad Korayem Lik-Ho Tam Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand Concrete Advances in Civil Engineering |
| title | Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand Concrete |
| title_full | Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand Concrete |
| title_fullStr | Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand Concrete |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand Concrete |
| title_short | Bond Behavior between BFRP Rebar and Seawater Sea Sand Concrete |
| title_sort | bond behavior between bfrp rebar and seawater sea sand concrete |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8850809 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chaowu bondbehaviorbetweenbfrprebarandseawaterseasandconcrete AT bingchenmeng bondbehaviorbetweenbfrprebarandseawaterseasandconcrete AT xianfengcheng bondbehaviorbetweenbfrprebarandseawaterseasandconcrete AT asgharhabibnejadkorayem bondbehaviorbetweenbfrprebarandseawaterseasandconcrete AT likhotam bondbehaviorbetweenbfrprebarandseawaterseasandconcrete |