Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools

Allografting patients with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) which are recognized by preformed antibodies constitutes the main cause for hyper-acute or acute rejections. In order to select recipients without these donor-specific antibodies, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) assa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Schlaf, B. Pollok-Kopp, E. Schabel, W. Altermann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/746395
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548851560480768
author G. Schlaf
B. Pollok-Kopp
E. Schabel
W. Altermann
author_facet G. Schlaf
B. Pollok-Kopp
E. Schabel
W. Altermann
author_sort G. Schlaf
collection DOAJ
description Allografting patients with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) which are recognized by preformed antibodies constitutes the main cause for hyper-acute or acute rejections. In order to select recipients without these donor-specific antibodies, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) assay was developed as a standard procedure about forty years ago. The negative outcome of pretransplant crossmatching represents the most important requirement for a successful kidney graft survival. The artificially positive outcomes of CDC-based crossmatches due to the underlying disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), however, may lead to the unjustified refusal of adequate kidney grafts. Two prospective female recipients destined for a living as well as for a cadaver kidney donation, respectively, exhibited positive CDC-based crossmatch outcomes although for both patients no historical immunizing events were known. Furthermore, solid phase-based screening or antibody differentiation analyses never led to positive results. Immediate reruns of the CDC-based crossmatch assays using the alternative antibody monitoring system (AMS-)crossmatch ELISA resulted in unequivocally negative outcomes. Consequently both transplantations were performed without any immunological complications for the hitherto follow-up time of 25 and 28 months, respectively. We here show two case reports demonstrating an alternative methodical approach to circumvent CDC-based artefacts and point to the urgent need to substitute the CDC-based crossmatch procedure at least for special groups of patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-d9a66a1952634e849fc0f75a223c8330
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6943
2090-6951
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Transplantation
spelling doaj-art-d9a66a1952634e849fc0f75a223c83302025-02-03T06:12:56ZengWileyCase Reports in Transplantation2090-69432090-69512013-01-01201310.1155/2013/746395746395Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic ToolsG. Schlaf0B. Pollok-Kopp1E. Schabel2W. Altermann3Tissue Typing Laboratory (GHATT), University Hospital Halle/Saale, Magdeburger Straße 16, 06112 Halle, GermanyDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Göttingen, GermanyTissue Typing Laboratory (GHATT), University Hospital Halle/Saale, Magdeburger Straße 16, 06112 Halle, GermanyTissue Typing Laboratory (GHATT), University Hospital Halle/Saale, Magdeburger Straße 16, 06112 Halle, GermanyAllografting patients with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) which are recognized by preformed antibodies constitutes the main cause for hyper-acute or acute rejections. In order to select recipients without these donor-specific antibodies, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) assay was developed as a standard procedure about forty years ago. The negative outcome of pretransplant crossmatching represents the most important requirement for a successful kidney graft survival. The artificially positive outcomes of CDC-based crossmatches due to the underlying disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), however, may lead to the unjustified refusal of adequate kidney grafts. Two prospective female recipients destined for a living as well as for a cadaver kidney donation, respectively, exhibited positive CDC-based crossmatch outcomes although for both patients no historical immunizing events were known. Furthermore, solid phase-based screening or antibody differentiation analyses never led to positive results. Immediate reruns of the CDC-based crossmatch assays using the alternative antibody monitoring system (AMS-)crossmatch ELISA resulted in unequivocally negative outcomes. Consequently both transplantations were performed without any immunological complications for the hitherto follow-up time of 25 and 28 months, respectively. We here show two case reports demonstrating an alternative methodical approach to circumvent CDC-based artefacts and point to the urgent need to substitute the CDC-based crossmatch procedure at least for special groups of patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/746395
spellingShingle G. Schlaf
B. Pollok-Kopp
E. Schabel
W. Altermann
Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools
Case Reports in Transplantation
title Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools
title_full Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools
title_fullStr Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools
title_full_unstemmed Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools
title_short Artificially Positive Crossmatches Not Leading to the Refusal of Kidney Donations due to the Usage of Adequate Diagnostic Tools
title_sort artificially positive crossmatches not leading to the refusal of kidney donations due to the usage of adequate diagnostic tools
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/746395
work_keys_str_mv AT gschlaf artificiallypositivecrossmatchesnotleadingtotherefusalofkidneydonationsduetotheusageofadequatediagnostictools
AT bpollokkopp artificiallypositivecrossmatchesnotleadingtotherefusalofkidneydonationsduetotheusageofadequatediagnostictools
AT eschabel artificiallypositivecrossmatchesnotleadingtotherefusalofkidneydonationsduetotheusageofadequatediagnostictools
AT waltermann artificiallypositivecrossmatchesnotleadingtotherefusalofkidneydonationsduetotheusageofadequatediagnostictools