L’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius commune
Restituting the dogmatic elaborations of the authors of the ius commune sometimes involves a systematic approach that seems unfaithful to the sources. Using the example of the nullitas of juridical acts, this article considers the identification of theories in the works of learned law. The link betw...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Association Clio et Themis
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Clio@Themis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/5318 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850129170103795712 |
|---|---|
| author | Florian Reverchon |
| author_facet | Florian Reverchon |
| author_sort | Florian Reverchon |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Restituting the dogmatic elaborations of the authors of the ius commune sometimes involves a systematic approach that seems unfaithful to the sources. Using the example of the nullitas of juridical acts, this article considers the identification of theories in the works of learned law. The link between the common conception of nullity as an ontological defect and the technical discourse on the nullity of prohibited acts led to constructions that can be described as theories. They address the question of how norms fit into the legal order, and thus the coherence of the law. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d95c44c4f7a54017810a2e9d2f55a3bb |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2105-0929 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | Association Clio et Themis |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Clio@Themis |
| spelling | doaj-art-d95c44c4f7a54017810a2e9d2f55a3bb2025-08-20T02:33:05ZfraAssociation Clio et ThemisClio@Themis2105-09292024-11-012710.4000/12qyqL’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius communeFlorian ReverchonRestituting the dogmatic elaborations of the authors of the ius commune sometimes involves a systematic approach that seems unfaithful to the sources. Using the example of the nullitas of juridical acts, this article considers the identification of theories in the works of learned law. The link between the common conception of nullity as an ontological defect and the technical discourse on the nullity of prohibited acts led to constructions that can be described as theories. They address the question of how norms fit into the legal order, and thus the coherence of the law.https://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/5318interpretationtheoriesnullitypenaltysystem |
| spellingShingle | Florian Reverchon L’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius commune Clio@Themis interpretation theories nullity penalty system |
| title | L’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius commune |
| title_full | L’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius commune |
| title_fullStr | L’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius commune |
| title_full_unstemmed | L’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius commune |
| title_short | L’identification de systèmes ou de théories dans les œuvres du ius commune |
| title_sort | l identification de systemes ou de theories dans les oeuvres du ius commune |
| topic | interpretation theories nullity penalty system |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/5318 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT florianreverchon lidentificationdesystemesoudetheoriesdanslesœuvresduiuscommune |