Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a Framework

Background. Point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for syphilis can contribute to epidemic control by offering a timely knowledge of serostatus. Although accuracy data on POC syphilis tests have been widely published, few studies have evaluated broader outcomes beyond accuracy that impact patients and heal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yalda Jafari, Mira Johri, Lawrence Joseph, Caroline Vadnais, Nitika Pant Pai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:AIDS Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/465932
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554321026220032
author Yalda Jafari
Mira Johri
Lawrence Joseph
Caroline Vadnais
Nitika Pant Pai
author_facet Yalda Jafari
Mira Johri
Lawrence Joseph
Caroline Vadnais
Nitika Pant Pai
author_sort Yalda Jafari
collection DOAJ
description Background. Point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for syphilis can contribute to epidemic control by offering a timely knowledge of serostatus. Although accuracy data on POC syphilis tests have been widely published, few studies have evaluated broader outcomes beyond accuracy that impact patients and health systems. We comprehensively reviewed evidence and reporting of these implementation research outcomes (IROs), and proposed a framework to improve their quality. Methods. Three reviewers systematically searched 6 electronic databases from 1980 to 2014 for syphilis POC studies reporting IROs. Data were abstracted and findings synthesised narratively. Results. Of 71 studies identified, 38 documented IROs. IROs were subclassified into preference (7), acceptability (15), feasibility (15), barriers and challenges (15), impact (13), and prevalence (23). Using our framework and definitions, a pattern of incomplete documentation, inconsistent definitions, and lack of clarity was identified across all IROs. Conclusion. Although POC screening tests for syphilis were generally favourably evaluated across a range of outcomes, the quality of evidence was compromised by inconsistent definitions, poor methodology, and documentation of outcomes. A framework for standardized reporting of outcomes beyond accuracy was proposed and considered a necessary first step towards an effective implementation of these metrics in POC diagnostics research.
format Article
id doaj-art-d8bcbe3d77a248dbbe526572ec442751
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1240
2090-1259
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series AIDS Research and Treatment
spelling doaj-art-d8bcbe3d77a248dbbe526572ec4427512025-02-03T05:51:57ZengWileyAIDS Research and Treatment2090-12402090-12592014-01-01201410.1155/2014/465932465932Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a FrameworkYalda Jafari0Mira Johri1Lawrence Joseph2Caroline Vadnais3Nitika Pant Pai4Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A2, CanadaDepartment of Health Administration, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, CanadaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A2, CanadaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, V Building (V2.19), 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, CanadaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, V Building (V2.19), 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, CanadaBackground. Point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for syphilis can contribute to epidemic control by offering a timely knowledge of serostatus. Although accuracy data on POC syphilis tests have been widely published, few studies have evaluated broader outcomes beyond accuracy that impact patients and health systems. We comprehensively reviewed evidence and reporting of these implementation research outcomes (IROs), and proposed a framework to improve their quality. Methods. Three reviewers systematically searched 6 electronic databases from 1980 to 2014 for syphilis POC studies reporting IROs. Data were abstracted and findings synthesised narratively. Results. Of 71 studies identified, 38 documented IROs. IROs were subclassified into preference (7), acceptability (15), feasibility (15), barriers and challenges (15), impact (13), and prevalence (23). Using our framework and definitions, a pattern of incomplete documentation, inconsistent definitions, and lack of clarity was identified across all IROs. Conclusion. Although POC screening tests for syphilis were generally favourably evaluated across a range of outcomes, the quality of evidence was compromised by inconsistent definitions, poor methodology, and documentation of outcomes. A framework for standardized reporting of outcomes beyond accuracy was proposed and considered a necessary first step towards an effective implementation of these metrics in POC diagnostics research.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/465932
spellingShingle Yalda Jafari
Mira Johri
Lawrence Joseph
Caroline Vadnais
Nitika Pant Pai
Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a Framework
AIDS Research and Treatment
title Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a Framework
title_full Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a Framework
title_fullStr Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a Framework
title_full_unstemmed Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a Framework
title_short Poor Reporting of Outcomes Beyond Accuracy in Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis: A Call for a Framework
title_sort poor reporting of outcomes beyond accuracy in point of care tests for syphilis a call for a framework
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/465932
work_keys_str_mv AT yaldajafari poorreportingofoutcomesbeyondaccuracyinpointofcaretestsforsyphilisacallforaframework
AT mirajohri poorreportingofoutcomesbeyondaccuracyinpointofcaretestsforsyphilisacallforaframework
AT lawrencejoseph poorreportingofoutcomesbeyondaccuracyinpointofcaretestsforsyphilisacallforaframework
AT carolinevadnais poorreportingofoutcomesbeyondaccuracyinpointofcaretestsforsyphilisacallforaframework
AT nitikapantpai poorreportingofoutcomesbeyondaccuracyinpointofcaretestsforsyphilisacallforaframework