Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams
ABSTRACT Background Patient engagement plays a valuable role in health research and quality improvement. While prior research highlights some principles and key considerations for patient involvement in these efforts, there is a limited understanding of how best to structure and support this engagem...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Health Expectations |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70194 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849731677575708672 |
|---|---|
| author | Shoshana H. Bardach Amanda Perry Terry Sturke Randy Stevens Milan F. Satcher |
| author_facet | Shoshana H. Bardach Amanda Perry Terry Sturke Randy Stevens Milan F. Satcher |
| author_sort | Shoshana H. Bardach |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Background Patient engagement plays a valuable role in health research and quality improvement. While prior research highlights some principles and key considerations for patient involvement in these efforts, there is a limited understanding of how best to structure and support this engagement, especially from the patient perspective and for healthcare innovation projects. Methods Transcripts and notes from semi‐structured debrief interviews with patient partners (n = 14) and team leads (n = 22) of 14 healthcare innovation projects conducted between 2020 and 2023 were analyzed thematically to identify perceived benefits, structures and supports that shape lived‐experience engagement, and recommendations for future patients' participation in healthcare innovation teams. Results Lived‐experience engagement was perceived as highly valuable to project teams and rewarding to the patients themselves. Approaches for structuring and supporting the patient role shaped engagement, highlighting several strategies (e.g., providing patient partners with opportunities to reflect and prepare, having smaller check‐ins, truly getting to know the patient, and offering opportunities for in‐person connection) to enhance the experience and ameliorate challenges. Patients also emphasized the importance of sharing their perspectives to fully realize the benefits of their engagement. Conclusion These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the bidirectional benefits of patient engagement within project teams. Taking opportunities to check in with patients throughout the project period, both formally and informally, regarding their preferences for involvement and experiences on the team would enable real‐time feedback and adjustments to optimize patient partner engagement. Patient or Public Contribution Since its inception, the Susan and Richard Levy Healthcare Delivery Incubator has incorporated patient and public involvement into the design and operations of its healthcare innovation projects. While the conceptualization of this analysis did not engage patients or the public, patients and individuals with lived experience provided the data. Further, three patient partners were engaged in the review of the findings, two of whom also actively contributed to the preparation of the manuscript by reviewing drafts, adding content, and making revisions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d8bbf7c83794461ba2e9910908bc55ae |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1369-6513 1369-7625 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Health Expectations |
| spelling | doaj-art-d8bbf7c83794461ba2e9910908bc55ae2025-08-20T03:08:28ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252025-04-01282n/an/a10.1111/hex.70194Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation TeamsShoshana H. Bardach0Amanda Perry1Terry Sturke2Randy Stevens3Milan F. Satcher4The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Hanover New Hampshire USAThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Hanover New Hampshire USAFamily Heart Foundation Fernandina Beach Florida USAHope for New Hampshire Recovery Manchester New Hampshire USAThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Hanover New Hampshire USAABSTRACT Background Patient engagement plays a valuable role in health research and quality improvement. While prior research highlights some principles and key considerations for patient involvement in these efforts, there is a limited understanding of how best to structure and support this engagement, especially from the patient perspective and for healthcare innovation projects. Methods Transcripts and notes from semi‐structured debrief interviews with patient partners (n = 14) and team leads (n = 22) of 14 healthcare innovation projects conducted between 2020 and 2023 were analyzed thematically to identify perceived benefits, structures and supports that shape lived‐experience engagement, and recommendations for future patients' participation in healthcare innovation teams. Results Lived‐experience engagement was perceived as highly valuable to project teams and rewarding to the patients themselves. Approaches for structuring and supporting the patient role shaped engagement, highlighting several strategies (e.g., providing patient partners with opportunities to reflect and prepare, having smaller check‐ins, truly getting to know the patient, and offering opportunities for in‐person connection) to enhance the experience and ameliorate challenges. Patients also emphasized the importance of sharing their perspectives to fully realize the benefits of their engagement. Conclusion These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the bidirectional benefits of patient engagement within project teams. Taking opportunities to check in with patients throughout the project period, both formally and informally, regarding their preferences for involvement and experiences on the team would enable real‐time feedback and adjustments to optimize patient partner engagement. Patient or Public Contribution Since its inception, the Susan and Richard Levy Healthcare Delivery Incubator has incorporated patient and public involvement into the design and operations of its healthcare innovation projects. While the conceptualization of this analysis did not engage patients or the public, patients and individuals with lived experience provided the data. Further, three patient partners were engaged in the review of the findings, two of whom also actively contributed to the preparation of the manuscript by reviewing drafts, adding content, and making revisions.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70194healthcare innovationhuman‐centered designlived experiencepatient partnerquality improvement |
| spellingShingle | Shoshana H. Bardach Amanda Perry Terry Sturke Randy Stevens Milan F. Satcher Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams Health Expectations healthcare innovation human‐centered design lived experience patient partner quality improvement |
| title | Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams |
| title_full | Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams |
| title_short | Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams |
| title_sort | evaluation of the patient innovation partner role perceived benefits structures supports and recommendations for lived experience engagement in healthcare innovation teams |
| topic | healthcare innovation human‐centered design lived experience patient partner quality improvement |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70194 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shoshanahbardach evaluationofthepatientinnovationpartnerroleperceivedbenefitsstructuressupportsandrecommendationsforlivedexperienceengagementinhealthcareinnovationteams AT amandaperry evaluationofthepatientinnovationpartnerroleperceivedbenefitsstructuressupportsandrecommendationsforlivedexperienceengagementinhealthcareinnovationteams AT terrysturke evaluationofthepatientinnovationpartnerroleperceivedbenefitsstructuressupportsandrecommendationsforlivedexperienceengagementinhealthcareinnovationteams AT randystevens evaluationofthepatientinnovationpartnerroleperceivedbenefitsstructuressupportsandrecommendationsforlivedexperienceengagementinhealthcareinnovationteams AT milanfsatcher evaluationofthepatientinnovationpartnerroleperceivedbenefitsstructuressupportsandrecommendationsforlivedexperienceengagementinhealthcareinnovationteams |