Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are alternative diagnostic methods that have enabled reliable biological diagnostic testing in all situations where previously only clinical diagnosis was available. Varying diagnostic accuracy of malaria RDTs makes policymakers confused while choosi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Temesgen Eticha, Tewodros Tamire, Temesgen Bati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Tropical Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1807608
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565889985150976
author Temesgen Eticha
Tewodros Tamire
Temesgen Bati
author_facet Temesgen Eticha
Tewodros Tamire
Temesgen Bati
author_sort Temesgen Eticha
collection DOAJ
description Background. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are alternative diagnostic methods that have enabled reliable biological diagnostic testing in all situations where previously only clinical diagnosis was available. Varying diagnostic accuracy of malaria RDTs makes policymakers confused while choosing malaria test kits for their country. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of currently being used malaria RDT in Southern Ethiopia. Methods. A cross-sectional study design was conducted from October 1 to December 15, 2016. A total of 160 patients were included in the study. Finger-prick blood sample was obtained from study subjects for the RDT test and microscopic examination. Collected data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. Result. The test kit evaluated had an overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 97.44%, 93.67%, 93.83%, and 97.37%, respectively, to detect the presence or absence of malaria. Sensitivity and specificity of the kit for P. falciparum detection were 63.27% and 94.3% and for P. vivax detection were 86.96% and 95.62%, respectively. The agreement between microscopy and RDT for specific identification of malaria species was moderate with a kappa value of 0.568. Conclusion. The overall performance of the kit was below the WHO standard. Further study on a large sample size is recommended to be carried out in the study area to use the test kit instead of microscopy for malaria diagnosis. Providing training on quality malaria laboratory diagnosis and availing necessary supplies for malaria diagnosis shall also be considered.
format Article
id doaj-art-d8870b1c135d4c3a97faedc029870513
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9686
1687-9694
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Tropical Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d8870b1c135d4c3a97faedc0298705132025-02-03T01:06:16ZengWileyJournal of Tropical Medicine1687-96861687-96942020-01-01202010.1155/2020/18076081807608Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional StudyTemesgen Eticha0Tewodros Tamire1Temesgen Bati2Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, EthiopiaMicrobiology unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaSchool of public health, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, EthiopiaBackground. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are alternative diagnostic methods that have enabled reliable biological diagnostic testing in all situations where previously only clinical diagnosis was available. Varying diagnostic accuracy of malaria RDTs makes policymakers confused while choosing malaria test kits for their country. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of currently being used malaria RDT in Southern Ethiopia. Methods. A cross-sectional study design was conducted from October 1 to December 15, 2016. A total of 160 patients were included in the study. Finger-prick blood sample was obtained from study subjects for the RDT test and microscopic examination. Collected data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. Result. The test kit evaluated had an overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 97.44%, 93.67%, 93.83%, and 97.37%, respectively, to detect the presence or absence of malaria. Sensitivity and specificity of the kit for P. falciparum detection were 63.27% and 94.3% and for P. vivax detection were 86.96% and 95.62%, respectively. The agreement between microscopy and RDT for specific identification of malaria species was moderate with a kappa value of 0.568. Conclusion. The overall performance of the kit was below the WHO standard. Further study on a large sample size is recommended to be carried out in the study area to use the test kit instead of microscopy for malaria diagnosis. Providing training on quality malaria laboratory diagnosis and availing necessary supplies for malaria diagnosis shall also be considered.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1807608
spellingShingle Temesgen Eticha
Tewodros Tamire
Temesgen Bati
Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Journal of Tropical Medicine
title Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Performance Evaluation of Malaria Pf/Pv Combo Test Kit at Highly Malaria-Endemic Area, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort performance evaluation of malaria pf pv combo test kit at highly malaria endemic area southern ethiopia a cross sectional study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1807608
work_keys_str_mv AT temesgeneticha performanceevaluationofmalariapfpvcombotestkitathighlymalariaendemicareasouthernethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT tewodrostamire performanceevaluationofmalariapfpvcombotestkitathighlymalariaendemicareasouthernethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT temesgenbati performanceevaluationofmalariapfpvcombotestkitathighlymalariaendemicareasouthernethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy