Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People

Abstract Background Ensuring equitable access to medical and long-term care (LTC) is critical to enable older people to maintain their health and well-being even after they undergo a decline in their intrinsic capacity. Methods We used data from five waves of the National Survey of the Japanese Elde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shohei Okamoto, Atsuhiro Yamada, Erika Kobayashi, Jersey Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal for Equity in Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585949276536832
author Shohei Okamoto
Atsuhiro Yamada
Erika Kobayashi
Jersey Liang
author_facet Shohei Okamoto
Atsuhiro Yamada
Erika Kobayashi
Jersey Liang
author_sort Shohei Okamoto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Ensuring equitable access to medical and long-term care (LTC) is critical to enable older people to maintain their health and well-being even after they undergo a decline in their intrinsic capacity. Methods We used data from five waves of the National Survey of the Japanese Elderly, conducted between 2002 and 2021, to assess gradients in access to medical care and LTC by income and education among Japanese individuals aged 60 years and above. Specifically, we assessed self-reported unmet needs for medical care and LTC, and public LTC use, and estimated the concentration indices (CI) to evaluate the degree of inequality and inequity. We standardised public LTC use by need and non-need variables. We analysed data derived from up to 1,775 person-wave observations from 1,370 individuals. Findings The pooled incidence across waves of forgone medical care, self-reported unmet support for activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental ADL (IADL), and those not certified for LTC services even with ADL or IADL limitations were 4.6%, 15.5%, and 62.5%, respectively. Public LTC use demonstrated pro-higher education and pro-rich distribution, whereas the gaps decreased for need-predicted use. Based on the CI estimates, no explicit inequality was found for forgone medical care. However, we observed inequity in standardised LTC use across education, indicating pro-higher education inequality, particularly among women and those aged ≥ 80 years. Conclusion Improving the understanding of available resources and strengthening the functions of health centres and communities are required to detect the needs of citizens and facilitate their access to necessary care.
format Article
id doaj-art-d86c1da8477343a3937b5f1d2435d2a4
institution Kabale University
issn 1475-9276
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal for Equity in Health
spelling doaj-art-d86c1da8477343a3937b5f1d2435d2a42025-01-26T12:20:51ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762025-01-0124111110.1186/s12939-024-02345-7Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older PeopleShohei Okamoto0Atsuhiro Yamada1Erika Kobayashi2Jersey Liang3Research Team for Social Participation and Healthy Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and GerontologyFaculty of Economics, Keio UniversityResearch Team for Social Participation and Healthy Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and GerontologyDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of MichiganAbstract Background Ensuring equitable access to medical and long-term care (LTC) is critical to enable older people to maintain their health and well-being even after they undergo a decline in their intrinsic capacity. Methods We used data from five waves of the National Survey of the Japanese Elderly, conducted between 2002 and 2021, to assess gradients in access to medical care and LTC by income and education among Japanese individuals aged 60 years and above. Specifically, we assessed self-reported unmet needs for medical care and LTC, and public LTC use, and estimated the concentration indices (CI) to evaluate the degree of inequality and inequity. We standardised public LTC use by need and non-need variables. We analysed data derived from up to 1,775 person-wave observations from 1,370 individuals. Findings The pooled incidence across waves of forgone medical care, self-reported unmet support for activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental ADL (IADL), and those not certified for LTC services even with ADL or IADL limitations were 4.6%, 15.5%, and 62.5%, respectively. Public LTC use demonstrated pro-higher education and pro-rich distribution, whereas the gaps decreased for need-predicted use. Based on the CI estimates, no explicit inequality was found for forgone medical care. However, we observed inequity in standardised LTC use across education, indicating pro-higher education inequality, particularly among women and those aged ≥ 80 years. Conclusion Improving the understanding of available resources and strengthening the functions of health centres and communities are required to detect the needs of citizens and facilitate their access to necessary care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7
spellingShingle Shohei Okamoto
Atsuhiro Yamada
Erika Kobayashi
Jersey Liang
Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People
International Journal for Equity in Health
title Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People
title_full Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People
title_short Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People
title_sort socioeconomic inequity in access to medical and long term care among older people
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7
work_keys_str_mv AT shoheiokamoto socioeconomicinequityinaccesstomedicalandlongtermcareamongolderpeople
AT atsuhiroyamada socioeconomicinequityinaccesstomedicalandlongtermcareamongolderpeople
AT erikakobayashi socioeconomicinequityinaccesstomedicalandlongtermcareamongolderpeople
AT jerseyliang socioeconomicinequityinaccesstomedicalandlongtermcareamongolderpeople