Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating masses
Abstract Simulation is a key step during the development of energy management strategies (EMSs) for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Moreover, optimal algorithms such as dynamic programming (DP) are used off‐line to define a benchmark for real‐time EMSs. However, several assumptions are made on the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | IET Electrical Systems in Transportation |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12003 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832559658027450368 |
|---|---|
| author | Abdoulaye Pam Alain Bouscayrol Philippe Fiani Fabien Faval |
| author_facet | Abdoulaye Pam Alain Bouscayrol Philippe Fiani Fabien Faval |
| author_sort | Abdoulaye Pam |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Simulation is a key step during the development of energy management strategies (EMSs) for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Moreover, optimal algorithms such as dynamic programming (DP) are used off‐line to define a benchmark for real‐time EMSs. However, several assumptions are made on the model to determine the appropriate energy management of an HEV. The rotating masses of the mechanical transmission, which are related to the vehicle dynamics, are often neglected for EMS development. In this study, different models for the EMS design of a parallel HEV are compared. An EMS based on the dynamical model that considers the rotating masses is used as a benchmark. A static model considering only the static mass of the vehicle is also studied. Intermediate models, such as an average gear model and an average mass model, are also considered. Simulations are performed using different driving cycles. The comparisons are based on the fuel consumption and also the computation time resulting from EMSs derived from the different models. Globally, the static model leads to an average error up to 20% on the energy consumption in comparison with the dynamical model. The average mass model leads to an error less than 1%. For real‐time simulations, the average mass model allows to reduce the computation time by a factor of 10 in comparison with the dynamical model. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d75ad5212d4e4d13a0db624727b62b72 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2042-9738 2042-9746 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IET Electrical Systems in Transportation |
| spelling | doaj-art-d75ad5212d4e4d13a0db624727b62b722025-02-03T01:29:38ZengWileyIET Electrical Systems in Transportation2042-97382042-97462021-03-01111364610.1049/els2.12003Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating massesAbdoulaye Pam0Alain Bouscayrol1Philippe Fiani2Fabien Faval3Univ. Lille, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Centrale Lille, Junia, ULR 2697 ‐ L2EP, F‐59000 Lille FranceUniv. Lille, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Centrale Lille, Junia, ULR 2697 ‐ L2EP, F‐59000 Lille FranceSherpa‐Engineering Paris FranceSherpa‐Engineering Paris FranceAbstract Simulation is a key step during the development of energy management strategies (EMSs) for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Moreover, optimal algorithms such as dynamic programming (DP) are used off‐line to define a benchmark for real‐time EMSs. However, several assumptions are made on the model to determine the appropriate energy management of an HEV. The rotating masses of the mechanical transmission, which are related to the vehicle dynamics, are often neglected for EMS development. In this study, different models for the EMS design of a parallel HEV are compared. An EMS based on the dynamical model that considers the rotating masses is used as a benchmark. A static model considering only the static mass of the vehicle is also studied. Intermediate models, such as an average gear model and an average mass model, are also considered. Simulations are performed using different driving cycles. The comparisons are based on the fuel consumption and also the computation time resulting from EMSs derived from the different models. Globally, the static model leads to an average error up to 20% on the energy consumption in comparison with the dynamical model. The average mass model leads to an error less than 1%. For real‐time simulations, the average mass model allows to reduce the computation time by a factor of 10 in comparison with the dynamical model.https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12003 |
| spellingShingle | Abdoulaye Pam Alain Bouscayrol Philippe Fiani Fabien Faval Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating masses IET Electrical Systems in Transportation |
| title | Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating masses |
| title_full | Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating masses |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating masses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating masses |
| title_short | Comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle: Impact of the rotating masses |
| title_sort | comparison of different models for energy management strategy design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle impact of the rotating masses |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12003 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abdoulayepam comparisonofdifferentmodelsforenergymanagementstrategydesignofaparallelhybridelectricvehicleimpactoftherotatingmasses AT alainbouscayrol comparisonofdifferentmodelsforenergymanagementstrategydesignofaparallelhybridelectricvehicleimpactoftherotatingmasses AT philippefiani comparisonofdifferentmodelsforenergymanagementstrategydesignofaparallelhybridelectricvehicleimpactoftherotatingmasses AT fabienfaval comparisonofdifferentmodelsforenergymanagementstrategydesignofaparallelhybridelectricvehicleimpactoftherotatingmasses |