Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National Study

Aims. To investigate the epidemiology of diabetes diagnosis and screening in Australian general practice. Methods. Cross-sectional study using electronic health records of 1,522,622 patients aged 18+ years attending 544 Australian general practices (MedicineInsight database). The prevalence of diagn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingyue Zheng, Carla De Oliveira Bernardo, Nigel Stocks, David Gonzalez-Chica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1566408
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552597705195520
author Mingyue Zheng
Carla De Oliveira Bernardo
Nigel Stocks
David Gonzalez-Chica
author_facet Mingyue Zheng
Carla De Oliveira Bernardo
Nigel Stocks
David Gonzalez-Chica
author_sort Mingyue Zheng
collection DOAJ
description Aims. To investigate the epidemiology of diabetes diagnosis and screening in Australian general practice. Methods. Cross-sectional study using electronic health records of 1,522,622 patients aged 18+ years attending 544 Australian general practices (MedicineInsight database). The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes and diabetes screening was explored using all recorded diagnoses, laboratory results, and prescriptions between 2016 and 2018. Their relationship with patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was also investigated. Results. Overall, 7.5% (95% CI 7.3, 7.8) of adults had diabetes diagnosis, 0.7% (95% CI 0.6, 0.7) prediabetes, and 0.3% (95% CI 0.3, 0.3) unrecorded diabetes/prediabetes (elevated glucose levels without a recorded diagnosis). Patients with unrecorded diabetes/prediabetes had clinical characteristics similar to those with recorded diabetes, except for a lower prevalence of overweight/obesity (55.5% and 69.9%, respectively). Dyslipidaemia was 1.8 times higher (36.2% vs. 19.7%), and hypertension was 15% more likely (38.6% vs. 33.8%) among patients with prediabetes than with diabetes. Diabetes screening (last three years) among people at high risk of diabetes was 55.2% (95% CI 52.7, 57.7), with lower rates among young or elderly males. Conclusions. Unrecorded diabetes/prediabetes is infrequent in Australian general practice, but prediabetes diagnosis was also lower than expected. Diabetes screening among high-risk individuals can be improved, especially in men, to enhance earlier diabetes diagnosis and management.
format Article
id doaj-art-d74be0f0b0994fa6a3e84b66997f6e0d
institution Kabale University
issn 2314-6753
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Diabetes Research
spelling doaj-art-d74be0f0b0994fa6a3e84b66997f6e0d2025-02-03T05:58:21ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67532022-01-01202210.1155/2022/1566408Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National StudyMingyue Zheng0Carla De Oliveira Bernardo1Nigel Stocks2David Gonzalez-Chica3Discipline of General PracticeDiscipline of General PracticeDiscipline of General PracticeDiscipline of General PracticeAims. To investigate the epidemiology of diabetes diagnosis and screening in Australian general practice. Methods. Cross-sectional study using electronic health records of 1,522,622 patients aged 18+ years attending 544 Australian general practices (MedicineInsight database). The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes and diabetes screening was explored using all recorded diagnoses, laboratory results, and prescriptions between 2016 and 2018. Their relationship with patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was also investigated. Results. Overall, 7.5% (95% CI 7.3, 7.8) of adults had diabetes diagnosis, 0.7% (95% CI 0.6, 0.7) prediabetes, and 0.3% (95% CI 0.3, 0.3) unrecorded diabetes/prediabetes (elevated glucose levels without a recorded diagnosis). Patients with unrecorded diabetes/prediabetes had clinical characteristics similar to those with recorded diabetes, except for a lower prevalence of overweight/obesity (55.5% and 69.9%, respectively). Dyslipidaemia was 1.8 times higher (36.2% vs. 19.7%), and hypertension was 15% more likely (38.6% vs. 33.8%) among patients with prediabetes than with diabetes. Diabetes screening (last three years) among people at high risk of diabetes was 55.2% (95% CI 52.7, 57.7), with lower rates among young or elderly males. Conclusions. Unrecorded diabetes/prediabetes is infrequent in Australian general practice, but prediabetes diagnosis was also lower than expected. Diabetes screening among high-risk individuals can be improved, especially in men, to enhance earlier diabetes diagnosis and management.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1566408
spellingShingle Mingyue Zheng
Carla De Oliveira Bernardo
Nigel Stocks
David Gonzalez-Chica
Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National Study
Journal of Diabetes Research
title Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National Study
title_full Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National Study
title_fullStr Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National Study
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National Study
title_short Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Screening in Australian General Practice: A National Study
title_sort diabetes mellitus diagnosis and screening in australian general practice a national study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1566408
work_keys_str_mv AT mingyuezheng diabetesmellitusdiagnosisandscreeninginaustraliangeneralpracticeanationalstudy
AT carladeoliveirabernardo diabetesmellitusdiagnosisandscreeninginaustraliangeneralpracticeanationalstudy
AT nigelstocks diabetesmellitusdiagnosisandscreeninginaustraliangeneralpracticeanationalstudy
AT davidgonzalezchica diabetesmellitusdiagnosisandscreeninginaustraliangeneralpracticeanationalstudy