Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand Interface

Surface groove morphology of structure and particle distribution of soil had a significant effect on the surface friction of structure. In order to investigate the interface shear stress-shear displacement curves, interface model and interface shear strength index when normal stress, groove width, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jukun Guo, Xiaowei Wang, Shengyou Lei, Rui Wang, Hailei Kou, Daokai Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9593187
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550521102139392
author Jukun Guo
Xiaowei Wang
Shengyou Lei
Rui Wang
Hailei Kou
Daokai Wei
author_facet Jukun Guo
Xiaowei Wang
Shengyou Lei
Rui Wang
Hailei Kou
Daokai Wei
author_sort Jukun Guo
collection DOAJ
description Surface groove morphology of structure and particle distribution of soil had a significant effect on the surface friction of structure. In order to investigate the interface shear stress-shear displacement curves, interface model and interface shear strength index when normal stress, groove width, and groove angle change, the interface shear tests of standard sand with steel plates are performed using an improved direct shear apparatus. Test results indicate that the peak shear stress increases with normal stress and the intersection angle between groove direction and shear direction. When the angle increases by 45°, the peak shear stress increases range from 4% to 13%. The peak shear stress increases with groove width, for every 1 mm increase in groove width, and the increasing extent of peak shear stress ranges from 4% to 22%, 3% to 13%, and 1% to 6%, respectively. When the groove angle is 45° and 90°, the increasing extent of peak shear stress decreases with groove width, but when the groove angle is 0°, the decrease regularity of peak shear stress increasing extent is not obvious. The hyperbolic model and Gompertz-C model are used to study the shear stress-shear displacement curves of sand-steel interface. The ratio of the interface peak shear stress of the hyperbolic model and Gompertz-C model to that of the shear test ranges from 0.90 to 1.03 and 0.88 to 0.98, respectively. The interface friction angle at the sand-steel interface ranges from 22° to 29°, and the friction angle of the rough interface is larger than that of the smooth interface. The interface friction angle increases with the intersection angle between the groove direction and the shear direction, the largest at 90°, the second at 45°, and the smallest at 0°. Under the same groove angle, the interface friction angle increases with the groove width, for every 1 mm increase in groove width, and the increasing extent of interface friction angle ranges from 4% to 15%, 4% to 7%, and 2% to 3%, respectively. The increasing extent of interface friction angle decreases with groove width, and this change rule is more obvious at the groove angle of 45° and 90° than at 0°.
format Article
id doaj-art-d71124e07b6b4abb95db62c811b04a33
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-d71124e07b6b4abb95db62c811b04a332025-02-03T06:06:32ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942020-01-01202010.1155/2020/95931879593187Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand InterfaceJukun Guo0Xiaowei Wang1Shengyou Lei2Rui Wang3Hailei Kou4Daokai Wei5School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shanxi 710064, ChinaSchool of Highway and Architecture, Shandong Transport Vocational College, Weifang, Shandong 261206, ChinaSchool of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shanxi 710064, ChinaSchool of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shanxi 710064, ChinaCollege of Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266100, ChinaSchool of Highway and Architecture, Shandong Transport Vocational College, Weifang, Shandong 261206, ChinaSurface groove morphology of structure and particle distribution of soil had a significant effect on the surface friction of structure. In order to investigate the interface shear stress-shear displacement curves, interface model and interface shear strength index when normal stress, groove width, and groove angle change, the interface shear tests of standard sand with steel plates are performed using an improved direct shear apparatus. Test results indicate that the peak shear stress increases with normal stress and the intersection angle between groove direction and shear direction. When the angle increases by 45°, the peak shear stress increases range from 4% to 13%. The peak shear stress increases with groove width, for every 1 mm increase in groove width, and the increasing extent of peak shear stress ranges from 4% to 22%, 3% to 13%, and 1% to 6%, respectively. When the groove angle is 45° and 90°, the increasing extent of peak shear stress decreases with groove width, but when the groove angle is 0°, the decrease regularity of peak shear stress increasing extent is not obvious. The hyperbolic model and Gompertz-C model are used to study the shear stress-shear displacement curves of sand-steel interface. The ratio of the interface peak shear stress of the hyperbolic model and Gompertz-C model to that of the shear test ranges from 0.90 to 1.03 and 0.88 to 0.98, respectively. The interface friction angle at the sand-steel interface ranges from 22° to 29°, and the friction angle of the rough interface is larger than that of the smooth interface. The interface friction angle increases with the intersection angle between the groove direction and the shear direction, the largest at 90°, the second at 45°, and the smallest at 0°. Under the same groove angle, the interface friction angle increases with the groove width, for every 1 mm increase in groove width, and the increasing extent of interface friction angle ranges from 4% to 15%, 4% to 7%, and 2% to 3%, respectively. The increasing extent of interface friction angle decreases with groove width, and this change rule is more obvious at the groove angle of 45° and 90° than at 0°.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9593187
spellingShingle Jukun Guo
Xiaowei Wang
Shengyou Lei
Rui Wang
Hailei Kou
Daokai Wei
Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand Interface
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand Interface
title_full Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand Interface
title_fullStr Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand Interface
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand Interface
title_short Effects of Groove Feature on Shear Behavior of Steel-Sand Interface
title_sort effects of groove feature on shear behavior of steel sand interface
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9593187
work_keys_str_mv AT jukunguo effectsofgroovefeatureonshearbehaviorofsteelsandinterface
AT xiaoweiwang effectsofgroovefeatureonshearbehaviorofsteelsandinterface
AT shengyoulei effectsofgroovefeatureonshearbehaviorofsteelsandinterface
AT ruiwang effectsofgroovefeatureonshearbehaviorofsteelsandinterface
AT haileikou effectsofgroovefeatureonshearbehaviorofsteelsandinterface
AT daokaiwei effectsofgroovefeatureonshearbehaviorofsteelsandinterface