The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of Lying

Although lying, which is a social part of human life, is seen as a negative phenomenon in society, it is considered quite reasonable by people in some cases. In this respect, it is important to examine in which circumstances lying is acceptable. This study aims to examine the relationships between s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sercan Balım, Muhammed Sukru Aydın
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Selcuk University Press 2024-06-01
Series:Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3337459
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568876822429696
author Sercan Balım
Muhammed Sukru Aydın
author_facet Sercan Balım
Muhammed Sukru Aydın
author_sort Sercan Balım
collection DOAJ
description Although lying, which is a social part of human life, is seen as a negative phenomenon in society, it is considered quite reasonable by people in some cases. In this respect, it is important to examine in which circumstances lying is acceptable. This study aims to examine the relationships between self-construal, values, religiosity, and the acceptability of different types of lies. A total of 605 participants completed the self-report measures of the Reasonability of Lying Scale, Portrait Values Questionnaire, and Autonomous-Related Self Scale. In addition, considering possible response biases, social desirability scores were also controlled. The results of the hierarchical regression analysis showed that religiosity, conservation, and self-enhancement values were the predictors of acceptability of self-protection lies. In terms of the acceptability of face management lies, conservation and self-enhancement values, and autonomous-relational self were the significant predictors. It was founded that the only variable that was a significant predictor of acceptability of prosocial lie was self-transcendence values. Acceptability of evasion lies were significantly predicted by religiosity and autonomous-relational self. Another finding was that religiosity, conservation and self-enhancement values and autonomous-relational self-construal were the significant predictors of acceptability of necessity lies. The results showed that religiosity, conservation and self-enhancement values, and autonomous-relational self-construal variables were significant predictors of acceptability of instrumental lies. Finally, in terms of the total acceptability of different types of lies; religiosity, conservation and self-enhancement values and autonomous-relational self-construal variables were the significant predictors. The results obtained from this study indicate that evaluations of lying are affected by different social factors, and these factors are discussed in the light of recent findings.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6c3c45cf36a4953a496bf2bff189856
institution Kabale University
issn 2458-908X
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Selcuk University Press
record_format Article
series Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-d6c3c45cf36a4953a496bf2bff1898562025-02-03T00:13:06ZengSelcuk University PressSelçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi2458-908X2024-06-015132334810.21497/sefad.1344323The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of LyingSercan Balım Muhammed Sukru AydınAlthough lying, which is a social part of human life, is seen as a negative phenomenon in society, it is considered quite reasonable by people in some cases. In this respect, it is important to examine in which circumstances lying is acceptable. This study aims to examine the relationships between self-construal, values, religiosity, and the acceptability of different types of lies. A total of 605 participants completed the self-report measures of the Reasonability of Lying Scale, Portrait Values Questionnaire, and Autonomous-Related Self Scale. In addition, considering possible response biases, social desirability scores were also controlled. The results of the hierarchical regression analysis showed that religiosity, conservation, and self-enhancement values were the predictors of acceptability of self-protection lies. In terms of the acceptability of face management lies, conservation and self-enhancement values, and autonomous-relational self were the significant predictors. It was founded that the only variable that was a significant predictor of acceptability of prosocial lie was self-transcendence values. Acceptability of evasion lies were significantly predicted by religiosity and autonomous-relational self. Another finding was that religiosity, conservation and self-enhancement values and autonomous-relational self-construal were the significant predictors of acceptability of necessity lies. The results showed that religiosity, conservation and self-enhancement values, and autonomous-relational self-construal variables were significant predictors of acceptability of instrumental lies. Finally, in terms of the total acceptability of different types of lies; religiosity, conservation and self-enhancement values and autonomous-relational self-construal variables were the significant predictors. The results obtained from this study indicate that evaluations of lying are affected by different social factors, and these factors are discussed in the light of recent findings. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3337459lyingreasonability of lyingreligiosityself-construalvalues
spellingShingle Sercan Balım
Muhammed Sukru Aydın
The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of Lying
Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
lying
reasonability of lying
religiosity
self-construal
values
title The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of Lying
title_full The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of Lying
title_fullStr The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of Lying
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of Lying
title_short The Role of Self-Construal, Values, and Religiosity on Judgements of the Reasonability of Lying
title_sort role of self construal values and religiosity on judgements of the reasonability of lying
topic lying
reasonability of lying
religiosity
self-construal
values
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3337459
work_keys_str_mv AT sercanbalım theroleofselfconstrualvaluesandreligiosityonjudgementsofthereasonabilityoflying
AT muhammedsukruaydın theroleofselfconstrualvaluesandreligiosityonjudgementsofthereasonabilityoflying
AT sercanbalım roleofselfconstrualvaluesandreligiosityonjudgementsofthereasonabilityoflying
AT muhammedsukruaydın roleofselfconstrualvaluesandreligiosityonjudgementsofthereasonabilityoflying