Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions

Introduction. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of linear measurements in dry human skulls in ideal position and different deviated positions of the skull. Methods. 6 dry human skulls were included in the study. Opaque markers were attached to alveolar bone. Buccolingual and mesio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahnaz Sheikhi, Sajad Ghorbanizadeh, Mehrdad Abdinian, Hossein Goroohi, Hamid Badrian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/214954
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548089444958208
author Mahnaz Sheikhi
Sajad Ghorbanizadeh
Mehrdad Abdinian
Hossein Goroohi
Hamid Badrian
author_facet Mahnaz Sheikhi
Sajad Ghorbanizadeh
Mehrdad Abdinian
Hossein Goroohi
Hamid Badrian
author_sort Mahnaz Sheikhi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of linear measurements in dry human skulls in ideal position and different deviated positions of the skull. Methods. 6 dry human skulls were included in the study. Opaque markers were attached to alveolar bone. Buccolingual and mesiodistal distances and heights were measured in 5 different regions of either jaws using a digital caliper. Radiographic distances were measured in ideal, rotation, tilt, flexion, and extension positions of the skulls. The physical and radiographic measurements were compared to estimate linear measurement accuracy. Results. The mean difference between physical measurements and radiographic measurements was 0.05±0.45. There was a significant difference between physical measurements and radiographic measurements in ideal, rotation, tilt, and extension positions (𝑃value<0.05). Conclusions. The accuracy of measurements in GALILEOUS CBCT machine varies when the position of the skull deviates from ideal; however, the differences are not clinically significant.
format Article
id doaj-art-d69d2875a6484386b67851ea08541329
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-d69d2875a6484386b67851ea085413292025-02-03T06:42:26ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/214954214954Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head PositionsMahnaz Sheikhi0Sajad Ghorbanizadeh1Mehrdad Abdinian2Hossein Goroohi3Hamid Badrian4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 8174673461 Isfahan, IranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 8174673461 Isfahan, IranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 8174673461 Isfahan, IranDental Implant Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 8174673461 Isfahan, IranDental Implant Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 8174673461 Isfahan, IranIntroduction. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of linear measurements in dry human skulls in ideal position and different deviated positions of the skull. Methods. 6 dry human skulls were included in the study. Opaque markers were attached to alveolar bone. Buccolingual and mesiodistal distances and heights were measured in 5 different regions of either jaws using a digital caliper. Radiographic distances were measured in ideal, rotation, tilt, flexion, and extension positions of the skulls. The physical and radiographic measurements were compared to estimate linear measurement accuracy. Results. The mean difference between physical measurements and radiographic measurements was 0.05±0.45. There was a significant difference between physical measurements and radiographic measurements in ideal, rotation, tilt, and extension positions (𝑃value<0.05). Conclusions. The accuracy of measurements in GALILEOUS CBCT machine varies when the position of the skull deviates from ideal; however, the differences are not clinically significant.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/214954
spellingShingle Mahnaz Sheikhi
Sajad Ghorbanizadeh
Mehrdad Abdinian
Hossein Goroohi
Hamid Badrian
Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions
International Journal of Dentistry
title Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions
title_full Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions
title_fullStr Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions
title_short Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions
title_sort accuracy of linear measurements of galileos cone beam computed tomography in normal and different head positions
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/214954
work_keys_str_mv AT mahnazsheikhi accuracyoflinearmeasurementsofgalileosconebeamcomputedtomographyinnormalanddifferentheadpositions
AT sajadghorbanizadeh accuracyoflinearmeasurementsofgalileosconebeamcomputedtomographyinnormalanddifferentheadpositions
AT mehrdadabdinian accuracyoflinearmeasurementsofgalileosconebeamcomputedtomographyinnormalanddifferentheadpositions
AT hosseingoroohi accuracyoflinearmeasurementsofgalileosconebeamcomputedtomographyinnormalanddifferentheadpositions
AT hamidbadrian accuracyoflinearmeasurementsofgalileosconebeamcomputedtomographyinnormalanddifferentheadpositions