Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching Hospital

The usefulness of a rapid latex agglutination method for the detection of Candida antigen (Cand-Tec; Ramco Laboratories. Texas) was retrospectively assessed in a university teaching hospital over a one year period. Patients were enrolled when the managing physician requested Cand-Tec testing for con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd J Anderson, Heather E Bryant, Deirdre L Church
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1992-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/725104
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849683886880063488
author Todd J Anderson
Heather E Bryant
Deirdre L Church
author_facet Todd J Anderson
Heather E Bryant
Deirdre L Church
author_sort Todd J Anderson
collection DOAJ
description The usefulness of a rapid latex agglutination method for the detection of Candida antigen (Cand-Tec; Ramco Laboratories. Texas) was retrospectively assessed in a university teaching hospital over a one year period. Patients were enrolled when the managing physician requested Cand-Tec testing for confirmation of possible invasive candidal infection. The majority of patients were critically ill; 56% were in the intensive care unit, and 30% subsequently died. Analyses were available from 79 patients and 125 samples. Thirty-three patients were diagnosed as having either definite invasive candidiasis or a high probability of infection based upon clinical, microbiological and tissue criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of Candida antigen detection was determined for doubling titres ≥1:4 to ≥1:16. If a titre of ≥1:4 was used as the diagnostic cut-off level for definite candidal infection, overall sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 69%, respectively, while the positive predictive value was 48%, and the negative predictive value 89%. When patients with a high probability of invasive candidal infection were included in analyses for a cut-off titre of ≥1:4, overall sensitivity and specificity were 70% and 69%, respectively, while the positive predictive value was 68%, and the negative predictive value 71%. The usefulness of the Cand-Tec test was not improved further for any subgroup of patients (including those in the intensive care unit), nor by following serial titres in individual patients. In this experience, the Cand-Tec test did not add enough information to include definitively or exclude invasive candidiasis in this high risk general patient population.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6837a5f3daa4d6a8d512eb1572d6093
institution DOAJ
issn 1180-2332
language English
publishDate 1992-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-d6837a5f3daa4d6a8d512eb1572d60932025-08-20T03:23:39ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases1180-23321992-01-013416717210.1155/1992/725104Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching HospitalTodd J Anderson0Heather E Bryant1Deirdre L Church2Department of Medicine, Foothills Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Foothills Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Foothills Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaThe usefulness of a rapid latex agglutination method for the detection of Candida antigen (Cand-Tec; Ramco Laboratories. Texas) was retrospectively assessed in a university teaching hospital over a one year period. Patients were enrolled when the managing physician requested Cand-Tec testing for confirmation of possible invasive candidal infection. The majority of patients were critically ill; 56% were in the intensive care unit, and 30% subsequently died. Analyses were available from 79 patients and 125 samples. Thirty-three patients were diagnosed as having either definite invasive candidiasis or a high probability of infection based upon clinical, microbiological and tissue criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of Candida antigen detection was determined for doubling titres ≥1:4 to ≥1:16. If a titre of ≥1:4 was used as the diagnostic cut-off level for definite candidal infection, overall sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 69%, respectively, while the positive predictive value was 48%, and the negative predictive value 89%. When patients with a high probability of invasive candidal infection were included in analyses for a cut-off titre of ≥1:4, overall sensitivity and specificity were 70% and 69%, respectively, while the positive predictive value was 68%, and the negative predictive value 71%. The usefulness of the Cand-Tec test was not improved further for any subgroup of patients (including those in the intensive care unit), nor by following serial titres in individual patients. In this experience, the Cand-Tec test did not add enough information to include definitively or exclude invasive candidiasis in this high risk general patient population.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/725104
spellingShingle Todd J Anderson
Heather E Bryant
Deirdre L Church
Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching Hospital
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
title Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching Hospital
title_full Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching Hospital
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching Hospital
title_short Evaluation of a Candida Antigen Detection Method (Cand-Tec): Experience from a University Teaching Hospital
title_sort evaluation of a candida antigen detection method cand tec experience from a university teaching hospital
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/725104
work_keys_str_mv AT toddjanderson evaluationofacandidaantigendetectionmethodcandtecexperiencefromauniversityteachinghospital
AT heatherebryant evaluationofacandidaantigendetectionmethodcandtecexperiencefromauniversityteachinghospital
AT deirdrelchurch evaluationofacandidaantigendetectionmethodcandtecexperiencefromauniversityteachinghospital