A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity
Behe recently defined the idea of irreducible complexity for biological systems. Using the language of mathematics, we reinterpret his definition from a dynamical systems perspective. Our basic premise is that living organisms behave dynamically in a chaotic way while predictable periodic behavior r...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2002-01-01
|
Series: | Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10260220290013480 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832558278090948608 |
---|---|
author | Abraham Boyarsky Pawel Góra |
author_facet | Abraham Boyarsky Pawel Góra |
author_sort | Abraham Boyarsky |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Behe recently defined the idea of irreducible complexity for biological systems. Using the language of mathematics, we reinterpret his definition from a dynamical systems perspective. Our basic premise is that living organisms behave dynamically in a chaotic way while predictable periodic behavior reflects cessation of function. We consider the dynamics of a functioning system and altered versions of it to draw conclusions about the irreducible complexity of the original system. The dynamics of an organism is described by means of a discrete time transformation τ on the phase space of the system. The statistical behavior of τ is studied by means of its Frobenius–Perron operator which, in special cases, can be represented by a matrix. Using these matrices we rewrite our definition of irreducible complexity:M is irreducibly complex if it is primitive but no principal submatrix of M is primitive. The primitivity property implies chaotic behavior, while failure to have the primitivity property reflects periodic behavior. Examples of irreducibly complex dynamical systems are presented. We show that certain dynamical systems which are irreducibly complex have an additional property, namely that other systems arbitrarily close to it behave in a dramatically different way. Such behavior suggests that selective evolution by means of small perturbations may not be a general mechanism for achieving the dynamical behavior of a complex system. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d651b6906be8474caeeee900e4280381 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1026-0226 1607-887X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society |
spelling | doaj-art-d651b6906be8474caeeee900e42803812025-02-03T01:32:55ZengWileyDiscrete Dynamics in Nature and Society1026-02261607-887X2002-01-0171232610.1080/10260220290013480A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexityAbraham Boyarsky0Pawel Góra1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Que. H4B 1R6, CanadaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Que. H4B 1R6, CanadaBehe recently defined the idea of irreducible complexity for biological systems. Using the language of mathematics, we reinterpret his definition from a dynamical systems perspective. Our basic premise is that living organisms behave dynamically in a chaotic way while predictable periodic behavior reflects cessation of function. We consider the dynamics of a functioning system and altered versions of it to draw conclusions about the irreducible complexity of the original system. The dynamics of an organism is described by means of a discrete time transformation τ on the phase space of the system. The statistical behavior of τ is studied by means of its Frobenius–Perron operator which, in special cases, can be represented by a matrix. Using these matrices we rewrite our definition of irreducible complexity:M is irreducibly complex if it is primitive but no principal submatrix of M is primitive. The primitivity property implies chaotic behavior, while failure to have the primitivity property reflects periodic behavior. Examples of irreducibly complex dynamical systems are presented. We show that certain dynamical systems which are irreducibly complex have an additional property, namely that other systems arbitrarily close to it behave in a dramatically different way. Such behavior suggests that selective evolution by means of small perturbations may not be a general mechanism for achieving the dynamical behavior of a complex system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10260220290013480Dynamical system; Irreducible complexity; Frobenius-Perron operator; Chaotic dynamics. |
spellingShingle | Abraham Boyarsky Pawel Góra A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Dynamical system; Irreducible complexity; Frobenius-Perron operator; Chaotic dynamics. |
title | A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity |
title_full | A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity |
title_fullStr | A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity |
title_full_unstemmed | A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity |
title_short | A dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity |
title_sort | dynamic system interpretation of irreducible complexity |
topic | Dynamical system; Irreducible complexity; Frobenius-Perron operator; Chaotic dynamics. |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10260220290013480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahamboyarsky adynamicsysteminterpretationofirreduciblecomplexity AT pawelgora adynamicsysteminterpretationofirreduciblecomplexity AT abrahamboyarsky dynamicsysteminterpretationofirreduciblecomplexity AT pawelgora dynamicsysteminterpretationofirreduciblecomplexity |