The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions
Background. To determine the agreement rate between histopathologic diagnosis and radiographic interpretation of jaw lesions. Methods. Cases with jaw pathologies that have diagnostically adequate histopathologic samples and radiographic examinations were reviewed retrospectively. Two board-certified...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Radiology Research and Practice |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4056359 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832551909492260864 |
|---|---|
| author | Soulafa Almazrooa Nada O. Binmadi Hanadi M. Khalifa Fatima M. Jadu Ahmed M. Jan Dalia E. Meisha |
| author_facet | Soulafa Almazrooa Nada O. Binmadi Hanadi M. Khalifa Fatima M. Jadu Ahmed M. Jan Dalia E. Meisha |
| author_sort | Soulafa Almazrooa |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background. To determine the agreement rate between histopathologic diagnosis and radiographic interpretation of jaw lesions. Methods. Cases with jaw pathologies that have diagnostically adequate histopathologic samples and radiographic examinations were reviewed retrospectively. Two board-certified oral and maxillofacial pathologists (OMFP) independently determined the histopathologic diagnosis, while two board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMFR) determined the radiographic interpretations independently. Then the histopathologic diagnosis and the radiographic interpretation were compared for agreement. Results. A total of 104 cases (53% females) were included with a mean age of 31 years. The agreement rate between histopathologic diagnosis and radiographic interpretation was 49%. OMFP required OMFR consultations to reach a diagnosis in 16% of cases. The most commonly encountered lesions were by far odontogenic cysts of inflammatory origin and the agreement for this disease category was 49.1%. However, agreement rates were highest for the disease category of tumors (62.5%). Conclusion. The agreement rate between OMFP and OMFR was higher for tumors than cysts. Agreement rates between OMFP and OMFR improved with efficient consultation between the two disciplines. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d62354a6ed834590bbb80c4cd1c82532 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-1941 2090-195X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Radiology Research and Practice |
| spelling | doaj-art-d62354a6ed834590bbb80c4cd1c825322025-02-03T06:00:16ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-19412090-195X2019-01-01201910.1155/2019/40563594056359The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw LesionsSoulafa Almazrooa0Nada O. Binmadi1Hanadi M. Khalifa2Fatima M. Jadu3Ahmed M. Jan4Dalia E. Meisha5Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaBackground. To determine the agreement rate between histopathologic diagnosis and radiographic interpretation of jaw lesions. Methods. Cases with jaw pathologies that have diagnostically adequate histopathologic samples and radiographic examinations were reviewed retrospectively. Two board-certified oral and maxillofacial pathologists (OMFP) independently determined the histopathologic diagnosis, while two board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMFR) determined the radiographic interpretations independently. Then the histopathologic diagnosis and the radiographic interpretation were compared for agreement. Results. A total of 104 cases (53% females) were included with a mean age of 31 years. The agreement rate between histopathologic diagnosis and radiographic interpretation was 49%. OMFP required OMFR consultations to reach a diagnosis in 16% of cases. The most commonly encountered lesions were by far odontogenic cysts of inflammatory origin and the agreement for this disease category was 49.1%. However, agreement rates were highest for the disease category of tumors (62.5%). Conclusion. The agreement rate between OMFP and OMFR was higher for tumors than cysts. Agreement rates between OMFP and OMFR improved with efficient consultation between the two disciplines.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4056359 |
| spellingShingle | Soulafa Almazrooa Nada O. Binmadi Hanadi M. Khalifa Fatima M. Jadu Ahmed M. Jan Dalia E. Meisha The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions Radiology Research and Practice |
| title | The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions |
| title_full | The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions |
| title_fullStr | The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions |
| title_short | The Agreement Rate between Radiographic Interpretation and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions |
| title_sort | agreement rate between radiographic interpretation and histopathologic diagnosis of jaw lesions |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4056359 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT soulafaalmazrooa theagreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT nadaobinmadi theagreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT hanadimkhalifa theagreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT fatimamjadu theagreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT ahmedmjan theagreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT daliaemeisha theagreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT soulafaalmazrooa agreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT nadaobinmadi agreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT hanadimkhalifa agreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT fatimamjadu agreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT ahmedmjan agreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions AT daliaemeisha agreementratebetweenradiographicinterpretationandhistopathologicdiagnosisofjawlesions |