Opportunities for and Challenges of Conducting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Meta-Analyses for Vaccines in Post-EU HTA Regulation Era
The dynamic nature of infectious diseases introduces inherent challenges to the design of vaccine clinical trials, which consequently makes vaccine indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) and meta-analyses (MAs) more challenging compared with regular pharmaceuticals. However, comparisons of efficacy a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Charlotte Graham, Erin Barker, Joe Moss, Emily Gregg, Rachael McCool, Nathalie Largeron, Mélanie Trichard, José Bartelt-Hofer, Maribel Tribaldos |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Market Access & Health Policy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2001-6689/13/2/31 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Using indirect comparisons in pharmacoeconomic examination
by: Yu. E. Balykina, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in the assessment of hemato-oncological drugs
by: Francisco Javier Parrondo-García, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
INDIRECT COMPARISONS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
by: S. V. Goryajnov, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01) -
Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines
by: Krzysztof Lach, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
EU HTA Regulation and Joint Clinical Assessment—Threat or Opportunity?
by: Volker Schuster
Published: (2024-05-01)