Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice

Objectives Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity vary widely due to inconsistent definitions and measurement methods. This study examines the independent effects on prevalence estimates of how ‘disease entity’ is defined—as a single chronic condition or chapters/domains in the International Classif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Harrison, Helena Britt, Graeme Miller, Joan Henderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2014-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/7/e004694.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087060941373440
author Christopher Harrison
Helena Britt
Graeme Miller
Joan Henderson
author_facet Christopher Harrison
Helena Britt
Graeme Miller
Joan Henderson
author_sort Christopher Harrison
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity vary widely due to inconsistent definitions and measurement methods. This study examines the independent effects on prevalence estimates of how ‘disease entity’ is defined—as a single chronic condition or chapters/domains in the International Classification of Primary Care (V.2; ICPC-2), International Classification of Disease (10th revision; ICD-10) or the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), the number of disease entities required for multimorbidity, and the number of chronic conditions studied.Design National prospective cross-sectional study.Setting Australian general practice.Participants 8707 random consenting deidentified patient encounters with 290 randomly selected general practitioners.Main outcome measures Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity using different definitions.Results Data classified to ICPC-2 chapters, ICD-10 chapters or CIRS domains produce similar multimorbidity prevalence estimates. When multimorbidity was defined as two or more (2+) disease entities: counting individual chronic conditions and groups of chronic conditions produced similar estimates; the 12 most prevalent chronic conditions identified about 80% of those identified using all chronic conditions. When multimorbidity was defined as 3+ disease entities: counting individual chronic conditions produced significantly higher estimates than counting groups of chronic conditions; the 12 most prevalent chronic conditions identified only two-thirds of patients identified using all chronic conditions.Conclusions Multimorbidity defined as 2+ disease entities can be measured using different definitions of disease entity with as few as 12 prevalent chronic conditions, but lacks specificity to be useful, especially in older people. Multimorbidity, defined as 3+, requires more measurement conformity and inclusion of all chronic conditions, but provides greater specificity than the 2+ definition. The proposed concept of “complex multimorbidity”, the co-occurrence of three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more different body systems within one person without defining an index chronic condition, may be useful in identifying high-need individuals.
format Article
id doaj-art-d4c07b9d722b432eb2802e9e5def581d
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-d4c07b9d722b432eb2802e9e5def581d2025-02-06T07:30:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552014-07-014710.1136/bmjopen-2013-004694Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practiceChristopher Harrison0Helena BrittGraeme MillerJoan HendersonMenzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaObjectives Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity vary widely due to inconsistent definitions and measurement methods. This study examines the independent effects on prevalence estimates of how ‘disease entity’ is defined—as a single chronic condition or chapters/domains in the International Classification of Primary Care (V.2; ICPC-2), International Classification of Disease (10th revision; ICD-10) or the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), the number of disease entities required for multimorbidity, and the number of chronic conditions studied.Design National prospective cross-sectional study.Setting Australian general practice.Participants 8707 random consenting deidentified patient encounters with 290 randomly selected general practitioners.Main outcome measures Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity using different definitions.Results Data classified to ICPC-2 chapters, ICD-10 chapters or CIRS domains produce similar multimorbidity prevalence estimates. When multimorbidity was defined as two or more (2+) disease entities: counting individual chronic conditions and groups of chronic conditions produced similar estimates; the 12 most prevalent chronic conditions identified about 80% of those identified using all chronic conditions. When multimorbidity was defined as 3+ disease entities: counting individual chronic conditions produced significantly higher estimates than counting groups of chronic conditions; the 12 most prevalent chronic conditions identified only two-thirds of patients identified using all chronic conditions.Conclusions Multimorbidity defined as 2+ disease entities can be measured using different definitions of disease entity with as few as 12 prevalent chronic conditions, but lacks specificity to be useful, especially in older people. Multimorbidity, defined as 3+, requires more measurement conformity and inclusion of all chronic conditions, but provides greater specificity than the 2+ definition. The proposed concept of “complex multimorbidity”, the co-occurrence of three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more different body systems within one person without defining an index chronic condition, may be useful in identifying high-need individuals.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/7/e004694.full
spellingShingle Christopher Harrison
Helena Britt
Graeme Miller
Joan Henderson
Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
BMJ Open
title Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
title_full Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
title_fullStr Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
title_full_unstemmed Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
title_short Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
title_sort examining different measures of multimorbidity using a large prospective cross sectional study in australian general practice
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/7/e004694.full
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherharrison examiningdifferentmeasuresofmultimorbidityusingalargeprospectivecrosssectionalstudyinaustraliangeneralpractice
AT helenabritt examiningdifferentmeasuresofmultimorbidityusingalargeprospectivecrosssectionalstudyinaustraliangeneralpractice
AT graememiller examiningdifferentmeasuresofmultimorbidityusingalargeprospectivecrosssectionalstudyinaustraliangeneralpractice
AT joanhenderson examiningdifferentmeasuresofmultimorbidityusingalargeprospectivecrosssectionalstudyinaustraliangeneralpractice