Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine
In this laboratory study shear bond strengths of three filled and one unfilled adhesive systems to enamel and dentine were compared. Forty-eight extracted intact noncarious human mandibular molars were randomly assigned to two groups of 24 one for bonding to enamel and the other for bonding to denti...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2012-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/858459 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832567550131568640 |
---|---|
author | Vajihesadat Mortazavi Mohammadhosein Fathi Ebrahim Ataei Niloufar Khodaeian Navid Askari |
author_facet | Vajihesadat Mortazavi Mohammadhosein Fathi Ebrahim Ataei Niloufar Khodaeian Navid Askari |
author_sort | Vajihesadat Mortazavi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this laboratory study shear bond strengths of three filled and one unfilled adhesive systems to enamel and dentine were compared. Forty-eight extracted intact noncarious human mandibular molars were randomly assigned to two groups of 24 one for bonding to enamel and the other for bonding to dentine. Buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth were randomly assigned for application of each one of filled (Prime & Bond NT (PBNT), Optibond Solo Plus (OBSP), and Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB)) and unfilled (Single Bond (SB)) adhesive systems (n=12). A universal resin composite was placed into the translucent plastic cylinders (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in length) and seated against the enamel and dentine surfaces and polymerized for 40 seconds. Shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, and the results were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, t-test, and Tukey HSD post hoc test with a 5% level of significance.There were no statistically significant differences in bond strength between the adhesive systems in enamel, but CSEB and SB exhibited significantly higher and lower bond strength to dentine, respectively, than the other tested adhesive systems while there were no statistically significant differences between PBNT and OBSP. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d4930f8956f245218eb9c7c17bb2d750 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Dentistry |
spelling | doaj-art-d4930f8956f245218eb9c7c17bb2d7502025-02-03T01:01:17ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/858459858459Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and DentineVajihesadat Mortazavi0Mohammadhosein Fathi1Ebrahim Ataei2Niloufar Khodaeian3Navid Askari4Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, IranBiomaterials Research Group, Department of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, IranDepartment of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89195165, IranDental Material Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, IranDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89195165, IranIn this laboratory study shear bond strengths of three filled and one unfilled adhesive systems to enamel and dentine were compared. Forty-eight extracted intact noncarious human mandibular molars were randomly assigned to two groups of 24 one for bonding to enamel and the other for bonding to dentine. Buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth were randomly assigned for application of each one of filled (Prime & Bond NT (PBNT), Optibond Solo Plus (OBSP), and Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB)) and unfilled (Single Bond (SB)) adhesive systems (n=12). A universal resin composite was placed into the translucent plastic cylinders (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in length) and seated against the enamel and dentine surfaces and polymerized for 40 seconds. Shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, and the results were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, t-test, and Tukey HSD post hoc test with a 5% level of significance.There were no statistically significant differences in bond strength between the adhesive systems in enamel, but CSEB and SB exhibited significantly higher and lower bond strength to dentine, respectively, than the other tested adhesive systems while there were no statistically significant differences between PBNT and OBSP.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/858459 |
spellingShingle | Vajihesadat Mortazavi Mohammadhosein Fathi Ebrahim Ataei Niloufar Khodaeian Navid Askari Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine International Journal of Dentistry |
title | Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine |
title_full | Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine |
title_fullStr | Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine |
title_full_unstemmed | Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine |
title_short | Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine |
title_sort | shear bond strengths and morphological evaluation of filled and unfilled adhesive interfaces to enamel and dentine |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/858459 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vajihesadatmortazavi shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine AT mohammadhoseinfathi shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine AT ebrahimataei shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine AT niloufarkhodaeian shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine AT navidaskari shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine |