Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine

In this laboratory study shear bond strengths of three filled and one unfilled adhesive systems to enamel and dentine were compared. Forty-eight extracted intact noncarious human mandibular molars were randomly assigned to two groups of 24 one for bonding to enamel and the other for bonding to denti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vajihesadat Mortazavi, Mohammadhosein Fathi, Ebrahim Ataei, Niloufar Khodaeian, Navid Askari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/858459
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567550131568640
author Vajihesadat Mortazavi
Mohammadhosein Fathi
Ebrahim Ataei
Niloufar Khodaeian
Navid Askari
author_facet Vajihesadat Mortazavi
Mohammadhosein Fathi
Ebrahim Ataei
Niloufar Khodaeian
Navid Askari
author_sort Vajihesadat Mortazavi
collection DOAJ
description In this laboratory study shear bond strengths of three filled and one unfilled adhesive systems to enamel and dentine were compared. Forty-eight extracted intact noncarious human mandibular molars were randomly assigned to two groups of 24 one for bonding to enamel and the other for bonding to dentine. Buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth were randomly assigned for application of each one of filled (Prime & Bond NT (PBNT), Optibond Solo Plus (OBSP), and Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB)) and unfilled (Single Bond (SB)) adhesive systems (n=12). A universal resin composite was placed into the translucent plastic cylinders (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in length) and seated against the enamel and dentine surfaces and polymerized for 40 seconds. Shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, and the results were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, t-test, and Tukey HSD post hoc test with a 5% level of significance.There were no statistically significant differences in bond strength between the adhesive systems in enamel, but CSEB and SB exhibited significantly higher and lower bond strength to dentine, respectively, than the other tested adhesive systems while there were no statistically significant differences between PBNT and OBSP.
format Article
id doaj-art-d4930f8956f245218eb9c7c17bb2d750
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-d4930f8956f245218eb9c7c17bb2d7502025-02-03T01:01:17ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/858459858459Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and DentineVajihesadat Mortazavi0Mohammadhosein Fathi1Ebrahim Ataei2Niloufar Khodaeian3Navid Askari4Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, IranBiomaterials Research Group, Department of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, IranDepartment of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89195165, IranDental Material Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, IranDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89195165, IranIn this laboratory study shear bond strengths of three filled and one unfilled adhesive systems to enamel and dentine were compared. Forty-eight extracted intact noncarious human mandibular molars were randomly assigned to two groups of 24 one for bonding to enamel and the other for bonding to dentine. Buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth were randomly assigned for application of each one of filled (Prime & Bond NT (PBNT), Optibond Solo Plus (OBSP), and Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB)) and unfilled (Single Bond (SB)) adhesive systems (n=12). A universal resin composite was placed into the translucent plastic cylinders (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in length) and seated against the enamel and dentine surfaces and polymerized for 40 seconds. Shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, and the results were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, t-test, and Tukey HSD post hoc test with a 5% level of significance.There were no statistically significant differences in bond strength between the adhesive systems in enamel, but CSEB and SB exhibited significantly higher and lower bond strength to dentine, respectively, than the other tested adhesive systems while there were no statistically significant differences between PBNT and OBSP.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/858459
spellingShingle Vajihesadat Mortazavi
Mohammadhosein Fathi
Ebrahim Ataei
Niloufar Khodaeian
Navid Askari
Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine
International Journal of Dentistry
title Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine
title_full Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine
title_fullStr Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine
title_full_unstemmed Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine
title_short Shear Bond Strengths and Morphological Evaluation of Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Interfaces to Enamel and Dentine
title_sort shear bond strengths and morphological evaluation of filled and unfilled adhesive interfaces to enamel and dentine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/858459
work_keys_str_mv AT vajihesadatmortazavi shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine
AT mohammadhoseinfathi shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine
AT ebrahimataei shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine
AT niloufarkhodaeian shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine
AT navidaskari shearbondstrengthsandmorphologicalevaluationoffilledandunfilledadhesiveinterfacestoenamelanddentine